Jump to content

Kangana Ranaut a bigger genius than I am.


Recommended Posts

Posted
25 minutes ago, Catalpha said:

I prefer supporting men who are supportive to women than women who think they are not being supported. 

chivalry.

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • chanchala

    18

  • Catalpha

    15

  • Dhimputha

    5

  • ShruteSastry

    2

Popular Days

Posted
8 minutes ago, chanchala said:

 

you took offense at my descriptin of nirmala sitaraman as a dumbfcuk. so I assumed you support women at powerful places who have the power to twist men's balls.

There is no reason to support them just because they are women. It is like any other man/human doing their job. They deserve to be praised if they are good, and deserve to be bashed if they are not. 

Posted
Just now, Catalpha said:

There is no reason to support them just because they are women. It is like any other man/human doing their job. They deserved to be praised if they are good, and deserved to be bashed if they are not. 

dude.. ...

Posted
Just now, chanchala said:

dude.. ...

It is like Modi posting a tweet to the Bangladeshi Prime Minister, praising her like this, "despite being a women is extremely strong on terrorism", is actually insulting her. See her as the Prime Minister of Bangladesh, not as a woman Prime Minister. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, ShruteSastry said:

chivalry.

Should be dead. Women know how to open car doors. They don't need men for that. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Catalpha said:

Should be dead. Women know how to open car doors. They don't need men for that. 

Respectful attention and gentle-manliness never get old. 

Posted
1 minute ago, ShruteSastry said:

Respectful attention and gentle-manliness never get old. 

respect is overrated. flirting is better. 

I have only 3 reactions to women. I talk subject (which I cant now because i have become progressively dumb), I flirt, or I don't give a fcuk.

I don't think I've ever given any woman 'respect'.

Posted
2 minutes ago, ShruteSastry said:

Respectful attention and gentle-manliness never get old. 

What about gentle womanliness?

Posted
1 minute ago, Catalpha said:

What about gentle womanliness?

not reqd. gentlemanliness also not reqd.

 

Posted
Just now, chanchala said:

not reqd. gentlemanliness also not reqd.

 

Gentlemanliness is not required because it is associated with chauvinism. But gentlewomanliness is required, because woman lack this and feminism makes it worse. 

Posted
7 minutes ago, ShruteSastry said:

Respectful attention and gentle-manliness never get old. 

do you really need women beyond as work partners or fcuk partners? 

its seems a waste of time. same with men too. friendships are all total waste. just exercises in social positioning because bunch of people have lost their zest in life.

so no need of respect. I actively disrespect everyone that I don't have any use for.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Catalpha said:

Gentlemanliness is not required because it is associated with chauvinism. But gentlewomanliness is required, because woman lack this and feminism makes it worse. 

gah!!! I asked you a specific question and you are giving me a lecture on feminism. do you really think I need a lesson on morals and ethics?

I asked you what? since you took offense at my characterization of nirmala sitaraman as a fcuking dumb b1tch, I was curious if you liked that dumb b1tch, or this dumb b1tch whose tweet I pasted here.

anyway you dont have to answer it if you are going to go off on a tangent about what womenhood is, and how feminism is evil. its immaterial to me. I only called you a fairweather feminist because you took offense at my description of nirmala sitaraman.

Posted
9 minutes ago, Catalpha said:

Gentlemanliness is not required because it is associated with chauvinism. But gentlewomanliness is required, because woman lack this and feminism makes it worse. 

catalpha you are awesome. hehe..

 

Posted
5 minutes ago, chanchala said:

gah!!! I asked you a specific question and you are giving me a lecture on feminism. do you really think I need a lesson on morals and ethics?

I asked you what? since you took offense at my characterization of nirmala sitaraman as a fcuking dumb b1tch, I was curious if you liked that dumb b1tch, or this dumb b1tch whose tweet I pasted here.

anyway you dont have to answer it if you are going to go off on a tangent about what womenhood is, and how feminism is evil. its immaterial to me. I only called you a fairweather feminist because you took offense at my description of nirmala sitaraman.

I don't know enough about her to tell if I like her. She is more irrelevant to me, so is the Indian economy. 

Posted
Just now, Catalpha said:

I don't know enough about her to tell if I like her. She is more irrelevant to me, so is the Indian economy. 

};_

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...