tom bhayya Posted October 9, 2020 Report Posted October 9, 2020 The new rules, too, are likely to be challenged in court. Amar Varda, president, ITServe Alliance. indica News picture, courtesy Mr Varda “We are talking within the organization and with our litigation and immigration attorneys how to go about it,” Amar Varda, president of ITServe Alliance, told indica News when asked how the Alliance would react. ITServe Alliance is the largest association of IT consulting firms in the United States (mainly Indian companies). It has over 1,400 companies as members, and these companies provide services to Fortune 500 businesses and government agencies by hiring employees in the US. Asked if the labor rule change is asking to raise salaries, Varda said: “Yes, and the way the law has been written it is going to undermine all our efforts so far.” “So, we are talking to our attorneys and are trying to figure out what our next step should be,” he said. He said the regulations were over 300 pages and attorneys were still poring trough them. However, the most concerning is the salary issue, and the Trump administration is also trying to restrict H-1B placement at the client’s place. The IFR says the third party placement would be for just one year. “But some contracts they might go on for multiple years,” Varada said. “They want to restrict H-1B employees working.” Varda said the point — employee-employer relationship — on which the Alliance won a case against the Unites States Citizenship and immigration Services had been brought back. “Earlier it was a memo, now they are coming back as a rule,” he said, sounding concerned. “The main difference, earlier it was a memo and the normal process is they have to publish the rule and take the comment it goes to Congress, but now they found their own loophole and try to make this as a final rule,” he said. “But again, we would definitely challenge them,” Varda said. “This would hurt the entire industry and would kill our business. We cannot pay those kinds of salaries they are proposing,” he stressed. He said the kind of salaries that were being made mandatory could be afforded by only the big companies such as TCS, Infosys, Tech Mahindra, Wipro. “Their model is both onsite and offshore. Our model companies all are like…are US based companies. Our employees work within the country in the US, so it is definitely a challenge,” Varda said. The regulation will restructure the prevailing wage system for the H-1B, E-3, H-1B1 and PERM programs. Entry-level wages for H-1B and PERM cases, for example, will increase to the 45th percentile of wages for the occupation and geographic location, from the 17th percentile – just under the current wage minimum for Level III. The regulation will be published on Thursday and will take effect immediately upon publication, though it is expected to be challenged in court. The $60,000 salary threshold was set in 1998 through the American Competitiveness and Workforce Improvement Act and has not been adjusted to date. If adjusted for inflation, the salary threshold for the exception to the US worker recruitment would be over $93,000. Outsourcing companies have been criticized as “gaming the system” so that they have a ready pool of low-paid temporary workers, which ultimately hurts the wages of US workers. In recent years, US companies such as The Walt Disney Company, Hewlett-Packard, University of California San Francisco, Southern California Edison, Qualcomm, and Toys “R” Us have reportedly laid off their qualified US workers and replaced them with H-1B workers provided by H-1B-dependent outsourcing companies. Acting Secretary Chad Wolf said through a press note: “We have entered an era in which economic security is an integral part of homeland security. Put simply, economic security is homeland security. In response, we must do everything we can within the bounds of the law to make sure the American worker is put first.” Quote
Ryzen_renoir Posted October 9, 2020 Report Posted October 9, 2020 "He said the kind of salaries that were being made mandatory could be afforded by only the big companies such as TCS, Infosys, Tech Mahindra, Wipro. " Hahahahaha , they will outsource everything rather than pay those salaries Quote
tom bhayya Posted October 9, 2020 Author Report Posted October 9, 2020 3 minutes ago, Ryzen_renoir said: "He said the kind of salaries that were being made mandatory could be afforded by only the big companies such as TCS, Infosys, Tech Mahindra, Wipro. " Hahahahaha , they will outsource everything rather than pay those salaries Avi penchindhey valla kosam intha dhed gaadu consultancy ela managing and 1400 consultancies ki representative ga ela elect chesaaro Quote
Ryzen_renoir Posted October 9, 2020 Report Posted October 9, 2020 5 minutes ago, tom bhayya said: Avi penchindhey valla kosam intha dhed gaadu consultancy ela managing and 1400 consultancies ki representative ga ela elect chesaaro Not really he is right in a way , if the H1B salaries are fixed at these rates . Most US companies will just outsource everything to india instead of the hybrid model . WITCH companies will have increased expenses in the short term but in the long term they will have more contracts and no need to pretend to hire American employees . TCS is approaching 150bil $ valuation despite these H1 rules because the topdogs are convinced that it will only profit the company over long term . No need to pay US salaries anymore , more profits Quote
Popular Post veerigadu Posted October 9, 2020 Popular Post Report Posted October 9, 2020 Veedu yevadu intha ayomayam gaduuuu 3 1 Quote
Spartan Posted October 9, 2020 Report Posted October 9, 2020 metta gallu...business meedaki vaste matram immediate ga lestaru.... ade 140EAD istam annapudu...S386 appudu matram anni muskon kurchunnaru konde nayallu... Quote
JambaKrantu Posted October 9, 2020 Report Posted October 9, 2020 15 minutes ago, Spartan said: metta gallu...business meedaki vaste matram immediate ga lestaru.... ade 140EAD istam annapudu...S386 appudu matram anni muskon kurchunnaru konde nayallu... Kurchunna kommanu evadu narukkuntadu man, they are protecting their interests Quote
Manikyam Posted October 9, 2020 Report Posted October 9, 2020 21 minutes ago, Spartan said: metta gallu...business meedaki vaste matram immediate ga lestaru.... ade 140EAD istam annapudu...S386 appudu matram anni muskon kurchunnaru konde nayallu... I-140 EAD aite bagane 10 pettaru Quote
snoww Posted October 9, 2020 Report Posted October 9, 2020 Matter in 2 lines flease. Case eppudu filing. Quote
JambaKrantu Posted October 9, 2020 Report Posted October 9, 2020 Just now, snoww said: Matter in 2 lines flease. Case eppudu filing. There will be around 10 different law suites from different companies. It will usually take them around 1 to 2 weeks to file. By end of the month my guess is that both the rules will be invalidated 1 Quote
soodhilodaaram Posted October 9, 2020 Report Posted October 9, 2020 aadiki inka attorney gadevadu key counter points ivvaledu.. anduke they are shaking for now lack of comments/public response itself is good grounds to trash this rule with or wo trump winning Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.