Andhra CM writes to CJI, accuses state HC of trying to topple his government

[Kool_SRG]

Kummu Jagananna kummu  ani @tom bhayya  telling..

[ParmQ]

1 hour ago, Ryzen_renoir said:

Total five HC judges and NV ramana being the AG for for TDP government and his long association with CBN. 

whats interesting is they have support of  justice chalameswar who fought against Modi government .

if NV ramana is not next CJI , then a congress biased judge is next in line for CJI

 

When was that? Time lines?

[Ryzen_renoir]

9 minutes ago, ParmQ said:

When was that? Time lines?

Somewhere in between 1994-2000  

Edit : I maybe wrong on the exact dates but my source is 

https://nalsa.gov.in/executive-chairman/hon-ble-mr-justice-n-v-ramana

He has worked as Additional Advocate General of Andhra Pradesh.

[Hydrockers]

4 minutes ago, Ryzen_renoir said:

Somewhere in between 1994-2000 

No check u r info once again

[Hydrockers]

Yellow pulka bhajana media lo tappa migita vatilo news undi ga 

[ParmQ]

NV Ramana has been credited for authoring path-breaking judgments in tax, constitution, arbitration, and criminal law. NV Ramana is the guy who asked to complete all cases against the politicians within certain time frame. Jaggadu automatic ga trigger ayyadu.

Jaggadi bad luck. Aa PIL actua ga vere judges handle cheyyali. Due to some reasons, they couldn't take and transfered it to the NV Ramana. NV Ramana is strict guy.

 

Supreme Court for time-bound trial of criminal cases against politicians

 

Bench asks govt. about status of cases registered by Central agencies such as CBI and ED

The Supreme Court on Wednesday resolved to ensure that pending criminal trials against sitting and former legislators, which run to over 4,000 across the country, will be completed in a time-bound manner.

“Are you serious about completing these trials in a time-bound manner?” a three-judge Bench led by Justice N.V. Ramana asked Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, for the Centre.

“We are 100% serious,” Mr. Mehta replied emphatically.

There are over 2,500 criminal cases pending against sitting legislators.

The Bench specifically asked about the status of cases registered by the Central agencies such as the CBI and the Enforcement Directorate against politicians. Cases range from corruption to money laundering.

Amicus curiae and senior advocate Vijay Hansaria and advocate Sneha Kalita replied that some of these cases were stuck at the stage of framing of charges.

In his latest report to the apex court, Mr. Hansaria suggested the setting up of one special court in each district to exclusively try politicians. He recommended that chief justices of each high court be requested to furnish an action plan for expeditious disposal of these cases within a year. He said corruption cases should be given “topmost priority.”

More judges

Mr. Mehta recommended various measures such as expiration of any stay orders within one month, appointment of more special court judges, infrastructure, etc. He said any delay from the side of the Centre would be taken up and dealt with.

The Solicitor General suggested that every special court judge be allotted a certain number of cases. This would take care of workload and ensure time-bound trial.

The Bench agreed to pass the necessary orders. The hearing was based on a petition filed by advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay highlighting the criminalisation of politics.

In September 2018, the Centre had informed the apex court about the setting up of 12 special courts across 11 States to exclusively try sitting and former legislators.

Delhi has two such courts while the States of Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Karnataka, Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, West Bengal, Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh have one each. Of the 12 special courts, six are sessions courts and five are magisterial courts.

The Supreme Court had on December 14, 2017 ordered special courts to be set up across the country to fast-track the long-pending trials of lawmakers.

 

[snoww]

1 minute ago, Hydrockers said:

Yellow pulka bhajana media lo tappa migita vatilo news undi ga 

Repu night ABN venkata krishna vuncle show lo sabbam and RRR guests gaa debate vuntadi le. Boothu kittu ki time ivvu babori tho kalisi script preparation ki. 

[Hydrockers]

Just now, snoww said:

Repu night ABN venkata krishna vuncle show lo sabbam and RRR guests gaa debate vuntadi le. Boothu kittu ki time ivvu babori tho kalisi script preparation ki. 

Modi ni kalisaka ante akkada green signal vachindi emo u start it we will support u ani 

Fafam pulka media jaggadiki motti kayalu babori meda CBI ani anukunaru jaggadu teliviga judges meda paddadu 

Aa judges ee unta babori meda case lu esina stay lu gag order lu vachedi

Ippudu mingaleru kakkaleru 

[ParmQ]

1 hour ago, Ryzen_renoir said:

Hindustan Times took down the article I posted ...looks like they are in damage control mode to gag news too 

The following is huge allegation man. Evidence lekunda ilanti allegations ki supreme court lo definete ga Jaggadiki inko sari mottikayal, especially the comment on the directions of CBN anedhi.

The Andhra Pradesh government, led by chief minister YS Jagan Mohan Reddy, on Saturday accused Supreme Court judge NV Ramana and the state high court of attempting to destabilise and topple the democratically-elected YSR Congress government in the state on the directions of Telugu Desam Party president N Chandrababu Naidu.

[Boomer]

Oho e thread flow miss aya

[Ryzen_renoir]

3 minutes ago, ParmQ said:

NV Ramana has been credited for authoring path-breaking judgments in tax, constitution, arbitration, and criminal law. NV Ramana is the guy who asked to complete all cases against the politicians within certain time frame. Jaggadu automatic ga trigger ayyadu.

Jaggadi bad luck. Aa PIL actua ga vere judges handle cheyyali. Due to some reasons, they couldn't take and transfered it to the NV Ramana. NV Ramana is strict guy.

 

Supreme Court for time-bound trial of criminal cases against politicians

 

Bench asks govt. about status of cases registered by Central agencies such as CBI and ED

The Supreme Court on Wednesday resolved to ensure that pending criminal trials against sitting and former legislators, which run to over 4,000 across the country, will be completed in a time-bound manner.

“Are you serious about completing these trials in a time-bound manner?” a three-judge Bench led by Justice N.V. Ramana asked Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, for the Centre.

“We are 100% serious,” Mr. Mehta replied emphatically.

There are over 2,500 criminal cases pending against sitting legislators.

The Bench specifically asked about the status of cases registered by the Central agencies such as the CBI and the Enforcement Directorate against politicians. Cases range from corruption to money laundering.

Amicus curiae and senior advocate Vijay Hansaria and advocate Sneha Kalita replied that some of these cases were stuck at the stage of framing of charges.

In his latest report to the apex court, Mr. Hansaria suggested the setting up of one special court in each district to exclusively try politicians. He recommended that chief justices of each high court be requested to furnish an action plan for expeditious disposal of these cases within a year. He said corruption cases should be given “topmost priority.”

More judges

Mr. Mehta recommended various measures such as expiration of any stay orders within one month, appointment of more special court judges, infrastructure, etc. He said any delay from the side of the Centre would be taken up and dealt with.

The Solicitor General suggested that every special court judge be allotted a certain number of cases. This would take care of workload and ensure time-bound trial.

The Bench agreed to pass the necessary orders. The hearing was based on a petition filed by advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay highlighting the criminalisation of politics.

In September 2018, the Centre had informed the apex court about the setting up of 12 special courts across 11 States to exclusively try sitting and former legislators.

Delhi has two such courts while the States of Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Karnataka, Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, West Bengal, Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh have one each. Of the 12 special courts, six are sessions courts and five are magisterial courts.

The Supreme Court had on December 14, 2017 ordered special courts to be set up across the country to fast-track the long-pending trials of lawmakers.

 

Adhi modi gadi plan , he was trying to implement it way back in 2014 but  majority SC baffas tho nimpi try chestunaru ippudu . 

 

[Hydrockers]

1 minute ago, ParmQ said:

The following is huge allegation man. Evidence lekunda ilanti allegations ki supreme court lo definete ga Jaggadiki inko sari mottikayal, especially the comment on the directions of CBN anedhi.

The Andhra Pradesh government, led by chief minister YS Jagan Mohan Reddy, on Saturday accused Supreme Court judge NV Ramana and the state high court of attempting to destabilise and topple the democratically-elected YSR Congress government in the state on the directions of Telugu Desam Party president N Chandrababu Naidu.

Mari ee evidence lu unnai ani high court judges meda phone tapping avutunayi annaru ?

 

[Boomer]

5 minutes ago, ParmQ said:

NV Ramana has been credited for authoring path-breaking judgments in tax, constitution, arbitration, and criminal law. NV Ramana is the guy who asked to complete all cases against the politicians within certain time frame. Jaggadu automatic ga trigger ayyadu.

Jaggadi bad luck. Aa PIL actua ga vere judges handle cheyyali. Due to some reasons, they couldn't take and transfered it to the NV Ramana. NV Ramana is strict guy.

 

Supreme Court for time-bound trial of criminal cases against politicians

 

Bench asks govt. about status of cases registered by Central agencies such as CBI and ED

The Supreme Court on Wednesday resolved to ensure that pending criminal trials against sitting and former legislators, which run to over 4,000 across the country, will be completed in a time-bound manner.

“Are you serious about completing these trials in a time-bound manner?” a three-judge Bench led by Justice N.V. Ramana asked Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, for the Centre.

“We are 100% serious,” Mr. Mehta replied emphatically.

There are over 2,500 criminal cases pending against sitting legislators.

The Bench specifically asked about the status of cases registered by the Central agencies such as the CBI and the Enforcement Directorate against politicians. Cases range from corruption to money laundering.

Amicus curiae and senior advocate Vijay Hansaria and advocate Sneha Kalita replied that some of these cases were stuck at the stage of framing of charges.

In his latest report to the apex court, Mr. Hansaria suggested the setting up of one special court in each district to exclusively try politicians. He recommended that chief justices of each high court be requested to furnish an action plan for expeditious disposal of these cases within a year. He said corruption cases should be given “topmost priority.”

More judges

Mr. Mehta recommended various measures such as expiration of any stay orders within one month, appointment of more special court judges, infrastructure, etc. He said any delay from the side of the Centre would be taken up and dealt with.

The Solicitor General suggested that every special court judge be allotted a certain number of cases. This would take care of workload and ensure time-bound trial.

The Bench agreed to pass the necessary orders. The hearing was based on a petition filed by advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay highlighting the criminalisation of politics.

In September 2018, the Centre had informed the apex court about the setting up of 12 special courts across 11 States to exclusively try sitting and former legislators.

Delhi has two such courts while the States of Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Karnataka, Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, West Bengal, Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh have one each. Of the 12 special courts, six are sessions courts and five are magisterial courts.

The Supreme Court had on December 14, 2017 ordered special courts to be set up across the country to fast-track the long-pending trials of lawmakers.

 

Naku Oka doubt NV Ramana overall cases fast track cheyamante jqggadi okade enduku trigger avthadu 

Pulka logic 

[Ryzen_renoir]

1 minute ago, ParmQ said:

The following is huge allegation man. Evidence lekunda ilanti allegations ki supreme court lo definete ga Jaggadiki inko sari mottikayal, especially the comment on the directions of CBN anedhi.

The Andhra Pradesh government, led by chief minister YS Jagan Mohan Reddy, on Saturday accused Supreme Court judge NV Ramana and the state high court of attempting to destabilise and topple the democratically-elected YSR Congress government in the state on the directions of Telugu Desam Party president N Chandrababu Naidu.

Basically NV ramana and batch  ni AP varaku sideline chestaru due to magnitude of these allegations . 

Motham mosha control loki pothundhi ,

[Boomer]

2 minutes ago, Ryzen_renoir said:

Adhi modi gadi plan , he was trying to implement it way back in 2014 but  majority SC baffas tho nimpi try chestunaru ippudu . 

 

Supreme court is liberal by standards no baffas