ParmQ Posted October 10, 2020 Report Posted October 10, 2020 4 minutes ago, Boomer said: Nuv em annav ra Modi held some meeting with judges and asked them to obey ani.. A meeting proof enti?ra pulka @Boomer vishayam unte aruge chey. Otherwise, I am not going to answer your kiddish questions. This is what I said. and it was in context to other members response. Modi wanted. I didn't say he wanted them to obey. Edho judges meeting (public meeting related to some judicial reforms) lo he asked the options for taking the cases on politicans on priority basis before the normal cases. Google. You will find the evidence. Quote
Boomer Posted October 10, 2020 Report Posted October 10, 2020 Pulka logics sucks ..,bring judges for petty politics and playing victim card over them Quote
Boomer Posted October 10, 2020 Report Posted October 10, 2020 2 minutes ago, Boomer said: @ParmQ a interview lo ayana em cheptunadu ,he is telling people are happy to give lands Anta ,sagam Mandi raithulu ivanante forceful ga tiskunadu sendraal ,andaru bagupadtharu Anta Amravati ki lands ichinavallu ,repu podhuna iyana Una bench ki amaravati land ivvani raithulu case isthe em tirpu istadu , government ki ankulmaga ichevadi kadha ?? Over to legal expert @Hydrockers for further clarification Quote
ParmQ Posted October 10, 2020 Report Posted October 10, 2020 2 minutes ago, Boomer said: @ParmQ a interview lo ayana em cheptunadu ,he is telling people are happy to give lands Anta ,sagam Mandi raithulu ivanante forceful ga tiskunadu sendraal ,andaru bagupadtharu Anta Amravati ki lands ichinavallu ,repu podhuna iyana Una bench ki amaravati land ivvani raithulu case isthe em tirpu istadu , government ki ankulmaga ichevadi kadha ?? I don't find anything wrong in his speach considering the event and it being his native place. Repu athanu ela judgement icchina, I will look into his judgement conclusion on what logical points he gave the judgement. Quote
Hydrockers Posted October 10, 2020 Report Posted October 10, 2020 1 minute ago, Boomer said: Over to legal expert @Hydrockers for further clarification Gag order lu iste db ki kuda applicable aa ? @ZoomNaidu ? Quote
ParmQ Posted October 10, 2020 Report Posted October 10, 2020 2 minutes ago, Boomer said: Over to legal expert @Hydrockers for further clarification Saripoyindhi. Iddharu okarikokaru piggybacking. Quote
Hydrockers Posted October 10, 2020 Report Posted October 10, 2020 Just now, ParmQ said: Saripoyindhi. Iddharu okarikokaru piggybacking. Mari online lo evvaru leru kaka Saturday ga andaru busy emo Nenu kuda poye time ki nuvvu thread esav ani unna 1 Quote
ParmQ Posted October 10, 2020 Report Posted October 10, 2020 29 minutes ago, Hydrockers said: Mari ee evidence lu unnai ani high court judges meda phone tapping avutunayi annaru ? Details Sravan Kumar submit chesaru. Allegations on politicans and Govt is one thing. Allegations on judiciary has another thing. Constitution has given that protection for judiaciry. Mee lanti burra thakkuva Paytm batch ki adhi (constitution) thelavaka HC and SC lo 70+ times siggu lekunda thittinchukunnnaru. 1 Quote
Ryzen_renoir Posted October 10, 2020 Author Report Posted October 10, 2020 2 minutes ago, Hydrockers said: Gag order lu iste db ki kuda applicable aa ? @ZoomNaidu ? Should be , I have never seen such a far reaching gag order for non military case . Basic ga Andhra HC will have the jurisdiction of all internet under that order Quote
snoww Posted October 10, 2020 Report Posted October 10, 2020 Any one has full text of the letter AP government wrote ? Quote
Boomer Posted October 10, 2020 Report Posted October 10, 2020 1 minute ago, Ryzen_renoir said: Should be , I have never seen such a far reaching gag order for non military case . Basic ga Andhra HC will have the jurisdiction of all internet under that order India lo internet meeda jurisdiction untadha HC ki ,antha mechanism available undha govt ki ,will govt act no kadha Quote
ParmQ Posted October 10, 2020 Report Posted October 10, 2020 1 minute ago, Ryzen_renoir said: Should be , I have never seen such a far reaching gag order for non military case . Basic ga Andhra HC will have the jurisdiction of all internet under that order FIR squash chesina judgements kooda unnayi. I think gag order main reason - NV Ramana ni lagataniki try chesaru ani. Rakul Preet Singh case lo kooda iccharu. Media houses ki supreme court through messages kooda vellayani live lo journalists chepparu. Her argument is this - Media lo naa gurunchi inthala paruvu theese vidhamga rasthunnaru. Repu naaku favour ga judgement vasthe ippudu jarigina nastam ela barthi chestharu ani. Quote
Ryzen_renoir Posted October 10, 2020 Author Report Posted October 10, 2020 3 minutes ago, snoww said: Any one has full text of the letter AP government wrote ? Still Missing a few portions Quote
snoww Posted October 10, 2020 Report Posted October 10, 2020 5 minutes ago, Boomer said: India lo internet meeda jurisdiction untadha HC ki ,antha mechanism available undha govt ki ,will govt act no kadha Dammalapati vuncle request. Facebook comments ni restrict seyyali anta. Lol. Next mark zuckerberg ni Amaravati court hearing ki rammani demand sesthadu emo. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.