Jump to content

AG KK Venugopal declines consent for contempt against YS Jaganmohan Reddy


Recommended Posts

Posted

The letter of CM Sanjivayya in 1961 raises the question of domination of Reddy community over the AP Judiciary while CM Jagan Mohan Reddy's letter complains about pro-Kamma influences. First was secret and had no visible consequences. Second complaint being publicised, whole nation is discussing it. Two dominant political parties – YSRCP ruling now, and TDP, which stayed in power for a long time in AP till 2019 are dominated by these two castes, respectively. The media in AP (& Telangana) is also divided on these party lines. Technical wings of these two political parties have developed strategies to do campaigns and counter campaigns purely on caste-party links, vertically dividing people, critics, and others. Any comment or tv debate gets the tag of either party depending on the support to the point. For instance, if somebody hails judgment of AP High Court striking down the GO which proposed for conversion of all schools into English medium schools, he would be tagged as TDP man. Someone who finds fault with general order gagging media from reporting, he is called YSRCP man. If anybody writes that Jagan has committed contempt of court and action should be taken against him, for the letter alleging bias and undue influence by a Supreme Court judge is he must be a TDP supporter, and if a critique says the system of rule of law demands consideration of allegations for further inquiry, he is a YSRCP's agent.

 
 

And all the three exposures deal with the issue of Roster and allocation of cases to various benches (of judges). Besides questioning the allocation of certain cases to only selective benches, former CM Sanjivayya made allegations against Chief Justice of caste based communal favouritism in selections & adjudication, besides unfair treatment of honest judges.

While Sanjivayya sought transfer of partisan Chief Justice, the other complainants did not make any specific demand but sought correction of the system. Jagan' letter contains serious allegations of political party bias in favour of TDP and against YSRCP, undue influence and illegitimate nexus with previous government and involvement in purchase of land along with others allegedly with inside information, etc.

 
 

It was Damodaram Sanjivayya in 1961, the first CM who wrote a detailed letter of complaints to the then Home Minister Lal Bahadur Shastry, dealing about favouritism based on caste and corruption allegedly by then AP Chief Justice, P Chandra Reddy. The entire text of the letter is accessible, as that was available at National Archives of India.

Recently, Justice K Chandru wrote an article in The Hindu explaining the position of a particular Judge before the then Chief Minister Sanjivayya complained to Union Home Minister. Justice Chandru mentioned that when Justice P Chandra Reddy was a judge of High Court of Andhra Pradesh there were some allegations, based on which he was transferred to Madras High Court. The official website of Madras High Court shows that Palagani Chandra Reddi worked as a Judge from 1950 to 1954. Andhra Pradesh High Court website aphcaa.in shows that P Chandra Reddy worked at AP High Court from 1958 to 1964.

Posted
1 hour ago, Boomer said:

One thing is pretty clear here ,this attorney general asks law minister abt intitation of contempt,if jaggu had really bjp support intha varaku Kuda vachedi kadhu..

And also NV Ramana meeda some investigation eyalsindi if he did corruption in amaravati lands , people will then feel jaggu is making some sensible allegations, otherwise telisindhe ga no value on his comments on ramana

Any investigation on a supreme court judge cannot be initiated by state governments. The only person that can order an investigation on the SCJ is CJI or parliament has to move the impeach petition with 2/3rd support in parliament. Whether there is credit or not has to be investigated and the CJI has to take necessary action to trigger it. AP HC is also poking its nose in several areas where it does not belong. Can't help. That is the sad state of Judiciary and democracy in India.

Posted
Just now, RSUCHOU said:

Any investigation on a supreme court judge cannot be initiated by state governments. The only person that can order an investigation on the SCJ is CJI or parliament has to move the impeach petition with 2/3rd support in parliament. Whether there is credit or not has to be investigated and the CJI has to take necessary action to trigger it. AP HC is also poking its nose in several areas where it does not belong. Can't help. That is the sad state of Judiciary and democracy in India.

Why not visa move impeachment motion in Parliament, elago TRS - YCP gunathmaka front kadha🤣🤣🤣 vote ese vallu estharu minimum number koodagattukunte saripodhi for impeachment notice.... Parliament lo apudu disco chesunte it would be correct, unless ilanti chillar aropanulu chesthe avvaddhu.... 

Posted
6 minutes ago, RSUCHOU said:

Any investigation on a supreme court judge cannot be initiated by state governments. The only person that can order an investigation on the SCJ is CJI or parliament has to move the impeach petition with 2/3rd support in parliament. Whether there is credit or not has to be investigated and the CJI has to take necessary action to trigger it. AP HC is also poking its nose in several areas where it does not belong. Can't help. That is the sad state of Judiciary and democracy in India.

oorike statements icheyadam manesi,  list few of them which HC poked on its own interest.

Posted
1 hour ago, Justice_Chowdary said:

SC judges allegations pettadam veru, 31 cases lo muddayiga and 16 months jail lo undi vachina lanjoduku allegations  okate antav..  aduke mimmlani jaffa galu anedhi. intha kula gajji enti ra meeku..

defend chesukodadniki baga try chesthunaru. 10Rs paytm batch

sarelae nenu jaffa or phulkha tharuvatha sangathi kaka

allegations 16 months mudhayi pettina  covicted vundi 10 yrs vinna s@njay dutt pettina or nippu Baboru public li bayata pettina...  or M!M allegation on ayodhya verdict public press meet pettina  it is treated as contempt of court 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Justice_Chowdary said:

SC judges allegations pettadam veru, 31 cases lo muddayiga and 16 months jail lo undi vachina lanjoduku allegations  okate antav..  aduke mimmlani jaffa galu anedhi. intha kula gajji enti ra meeku..

defend chesukodadniki baga try chesthunaru. 10Rs paytm batch

IN front of law until convicted everyone is same. they have all rights to exercise.   

pulkas still cant accept jagga as ap cm and ycp is the 4th biggest party in parliament. god bless you. 

 

 

Posted
19 minutes ago, RSUCHOU said:

Any investigation on a supreme court judge cannot be initiated by state governments. The only person that can order an investigation on the SCJ is CJI or parliament has to move the impeach petition with 2/3rd support in parliament. Whether there is credit or not has to be investigated and the CJI has to take necessary action to trigger it. AP HC is also poking its nose in several areas where it does not belong. Can't help. That is the sad state of Judiciary and democracy in India.

jagga just exposing judiciary. pulkas thinking CBN is protector judiciary.patti vittlu evaru leru akkada.

Posted
19 minutes ago, Boomer said:

Why not visa move impeachment motion in Parliament, elago TRS - YCP gunathmaka front kadha🤣🤣🤣 vote ese vallu estharu minimum number koodagattukunte saripodhi for impeachment notice.... Parliament lo apudu disco chesunte it would be correct, unless ilanti chillar aropanulu chesthe avvaddhu.... 

telugu chadavatam rakunda jagga cm eeyadu.. don't under estimate him, plkas have been doing this since 2009,did not learn anything.

Posted
1 minute ago, JUST444FUN said:

telugu chadavatam rakunda jagga cm eeyadu.. don't under estimate him, plkas have been doing this since 2009,did not learn anything.

K pulkas are different... Apatlo media leka valla sollu chellubattu aindhi

Now social media is prevalent can't help, unless takes Nv ramana amravati lands thing to logical conclusion, jail kelthe judge corrupt anduke nameedha tappudu teerpu ichadu ane rojulu poyeyi

Posted
14 minutes ago, Justice_Chowdary said:

oorike statements icheyadam manesi,  list few of them which HC poked on its own interest.

Ramesh Hospital mida stay order isthae.. SC ming@dam list lo marichipoyara kaka

Baramaravathi mida tehsildar case.. SC minguthae.. stay order theseyadam list lo ledha kaka..

Bramaravath! land scam CID chestha antae Stay Order isthae.. SC mingi 2 weeks lo revise cheyyamannadhi List lo ledha kaka

Gag Order mida Nat!onal media lo kuda debate issue vasthae.. SC rervision adgatam List lo ledha kaka....

of course.. Jalaga ki Fud Court muttakayalu kuda .. it is accepted..

But nu adigina question.. "list few of them which HC poked on its own interest"  ki List chudaledha

Posted
Just now, kidney said:

Ramesh Hospital mida stay order isthae.. SC ming@dam list lo marichipoyara kaka

Baramaravathi mida tehsildar case.. SC minguthae.. stay order theseyadam list lo ledha kaka..

Bramaravath! land scam CID chestha antae Stay Order isthae.. SC mingi 2 weeks lo revise cheyyamannadhi List lo ledha kaka

Gag Order mida Nat!onal media lo kuda debate issue vasthae.. SC rervision adgatam List lo ledha kaka....

of course.. Jalaga ki Fud Court muttakayalu kuda .. it is accepted..

But nu adigina question.. "list few of them which HC poked on its own interest"  ki List chudaledha

Yeah HC meeda chala unnai, a letter edho undhi kadha adhi post chey bro!!! 

N. V ramana dhi different issue 

HC is running parallel government in Ap which is wrong

Posted
Just now, Anta Assamey said:

Jagan Anna 30 years ki plan chesadu .. Ivi anni lite... 47osjd.gif

Baboru is some what near to getting retirement...

TD'P ki Strong leader vachae varaku... Jalaga is chance ekkuva vundhi to retain power...

Similar situation to Lahul in Central Cong...

Posted
2 hours ago, kidney said:

Step Down kuda Not in near distance kaka.....Max 1 Rupee to 10Rs fine yestharu... Per month enno "Contemp't of Cour't" cases register aiythayi

right from AP S!ngh press conf on Disha case to Pr@shan Bhus@n case.. MIM Comments on Ayodhy@ verdict..

antha dhaka endhuku 2 yrs ago SC judges ae press conf pettaru "Democr@cy at St@ke" ani on CJI.. emaindhi 10RS fine

 

There is no fine or step down...matter over.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
1 minute ago, kidney said:

Baboru is some what near to getting retirement...

TD'P ki Strong leader vachae varaku... Jalaga is chance ekkuva vundhi to retain power...

Similar situation to Lahul in Central Cong...

Same matter nuvvu Naidu uncle side nunchi cheppavu nenu Jagan Anna side nunchi cheppanu ...47osjd.gif

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...