Jump to content

Companies are fleeing California. Blame bad government.


Recommended Posts

Posted

Amid raging wildfires, rolling blackouts and a worsening coronavirus outbreak, it has not been a great year for California. Unfortunately, the state is also reeling from a man-made disaster: an exodus of thriving companies to other states.

In just the past few months, Hewlett Packard Enterprise said it was leaving for Houston. Oracle said it would decamp for Austin, Texas. Palantir Technologies, Charles Schwab and McKesson are all bound for greener pastures. No less an information-age avatar than Elon Musk has had enough. He thinks regulators have grown "complacent" and "entitled" about the state's world-class tech companies.

No doubt, he has a point. Silicon Valley's high-tech cluster has been the envy of the world for decades, but there's nothing inevitable about its success. As many cities have found in recent years, building such agglomerations is exceedingly hard, as much art as science. Low taxes, modest regulation, sound infrastructure and good education systems all help, but aren't always sufficient. Once squandered, moreover, such dynamism can't easily be revived. With competition rising across the U.S., the area's policymakers need to recognize the dangers ahead.

In recent years, San Francisco has seemed to be begging for companies to leave. In addition to familiar failures of governance - widespread homelessness, inadequate transit, soaring property crime - it has also imposed more idiosyncratic hindrances. Far from welcoming experimentation, it has sought to undermine or stamp out home-rental services, food-delivery apps, ride-hailing firms, electric-scooter companies, facial recognition technology, delivery robots and more, even as the pioneers in each of those fields attempted to set up shop in the city. It tried to ban corporate cafeterias - a major tech-industry perk - on the not-so-sound theory that this would protect local restaurants. It created an "Office of Emerging Technology" that will only grant permission to test new products if they're deemed, in a city bureaucrat's view, to provide a "net common good." Whatever the merits of such meddling, it's hardly a formula for unbounded inventiveness.

These two traits - poor governance and animosity toward business - have collided calamitously with respect to the city's housing market. Even as officials offered tax breaks for tech companies to headquarter themselves downtown, they mostly refused to lift residential height limits, modify zoning rules or allow significant new construction to accommodate the influx of new workers. They then expressed shock that rents and home prices were soaring - and blamed the tech companies.

California's legislature has only made matters worse. A bill it enacted in 2019, ostensibly intended to protect gig workers, threatened to undo the business models of some of the state's biggest tech companies until voters granted them a reprieve in a November referendum. A new privacy law has imposed immense compliance burdens - amounting to as much as 1.8% of state output in 2018 - while conferring almost no consumer benefits. An 8.8% state corporate tax rate and 13.3% top income-tax rate (the nation's highest) haven't helped.

Of course, California isn't alone in squandering such advantages. New York City has been the world's top finance hub for many years, and increasingly had become home to a thriving tech community as well. But a similar blend of poor policy choices, high taxes, needless red tape, rising crime, and occasional outright hostility - as with the senseless opposition to Amazon.com's proposed headquarters - has been pushing both industries to friendlier climes in recent years.

Such carelessness is all the more damaging because a tech hub is more than the sum of its parts. Such clusters accelerate the flow of ideas, concentrate skilled workers and create productive new networks. They're likely to boost investment, business formation, innovation, wages and growth. And their benefits are widely shared: By one estimate, each new tech job creates five additional jobs in other industries, a multiplier effect about three times larger than that for manufacturing. That's not to mention the immensely popular products that result.

For now, the Bay Area is unlikely to be displaced as the nation's top tech hub. After all, it's still home to some of the world's most valuable companies, draws an outsized share of venture-capital investment, and remains an unrivaled incubator for start-ups. And predictions of Silicon Valley's demise have proved reliably wrong for decades.

Even so, no state can antagonize its companies so extravagantly and expect them to stay put forever. As every Californian knows, the open road is all too inviting.

Posted
1 minute ago, Rebel_Uncle_Fans said:

million dollar petti house konna uncles assam inkaa

Ammestaru bruh, No loss.

Posted
2 minutes ago, ShruteSastry said:

Ammestaru bruh, No loss.

Evadu kontadu bro Covid vallanna california companies going out inko 6 months lo pay rates taginchi dakota states move chestaru

Posted

diversification and gender bias ani m kudputunnaru state laws to...

avasaram lekapoina...oka female, and nallodo, maccu gado compulsory anta team lo..companies

hiring appudu manager laki HR team nunchi pressure...eligible candidate unna lekapoina they have to meet the criteria...

monna ballot lo kotta rule pettaru...

universities and colleges lo...enterance tests nullify cheyali...and diversify the students...

naaku telisina oka family papam..she scored high on SAT ...but lost the seat to other person who scored well below her and less credentials..

family velli college lo adigite...frank ga cheppali ante..diversification and state funds kosam ivvalekapoyam seat ani moham meede annadanta

 

 

so obviously companies who want to follow and cannot make a move...m kudisipotai..

those companies that want to fall for this and hire the right needed people....will move off..or atleast reduce the capacity here and move HQs.

@Vaampire @tom bhayya

  • Upvote 2
Posted
39 minutes ago, Spartan said:

diversification and gender bias ani m kudputunnaru state laws to...

avasaram lekapoina...oka female, and nallodo, maccu gado compulsory anta team lo..companies

hiring appudu manager laki HR team nunchi pressure...eligible candidate unna lekapoina they have to meet the criteria...

monna ballot lo kotta rule pettaru...

universities and colleges lo...enterance tests nullify cheyali...and diversify the students...

naaku telisina oka family papam..she scored high on SAT ...but lost the seat to other person who scored well below her and less credentials..

family velli college lo adigite...frank ga cheppali ante..diversification and state funds kosam ivvalekapoyam seat ani moham meede annadanta

 

 

so obviously companies who want to follow and cannot make a move...m kudisipotai..

those companies that want to fall for this and hire the right needed people....will move off..or atleast reduce the capacity here and move HQs.

@Vaampire @tom bhayya

India lo reservation, ikkada diversification... 

sahajeevanam cheyyali thappadu.

google lo aithey promotions lo kooda undi ee daridram. Atleast fb lo promos lo aithey eppudu pressure cheyyaley too mgmt.

@Spartan

Posted
1 minute ago, Vaampire said:

India lo reservation, ikkada diversification... 

sahajeevanam cheyyali thappadu.

google lo aithey promotions lo kooda undi ee daridram. Atleast fb lo promos lo aithey eppudu pressure cheyyaley too mgmt.

@Spartan

Ma group lo same happened 

sales background lo pani chesi . Product owner aina okameki engineering manager and director chesaru within span of 2 yrs 

daniki engg lo lambda spelling televad kaani <3da lo eshal matram baga vestundi 

Ame chesina politics ki iddaru manchi architects jump 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Spartan said:

Ma group lo same happened 

sales background lo pani chesi . Product owner aina okameki engineering manager and director chesaru within span of 2 yrs 

daniki engg lo lambda spelling televad kaani <3da lo eshal matram baga vestundi 

Ame chesina politics ki iddaru manchi architects jump 

The problem with affirmative action is that people tend to almost always think that if someone is a minority, they are not as capable as a white male. This is definitely the trend in academia where people think someone just got a job or a grant or a promotion because they are female, black or latino. That way white men can feel better about themselves. 

Posted
2 hours ago, Spartan said:

diversification and gender bias ani m kudputunnaru state laws to...

avasaram lekapoina...oka female, and nallodo, maccu gado compulsory anta team lo..companies

hiring appudu manager laki HR team nunchi pressure...eligible candidate unna lekapoina they have to meet the criteria...

monna ballot lo kotta rule pettaru...

universities and colleges lo...enterance tests nullify cheyali...and diversify the students...

naaku telisina oka family papam..she scored high on SAT ...but lost the seat to other person who scored well below her and less credentials..

family velli college lo adigite...frank ga cheppali ante..diversification and state funds kosam ivvalekapoyam seat ani moham meede annadanta

 

 

so obviously companies who want to follow and cannot make a move...m kudisipotai..

those companies that want to fall for this and hire the right needed people....will move off..or atleast reduce the capacity here and move HQs.

@Vaampire @tom bhayya

Diversity has nothing to do with state govt, it’s industry decision. 

Posted
2 hours ago, PilliBeta said:

The problem with affirmative action is that people tend to almost always think that if someone is a minority, they are not as capable as a white male. This is definitely the trend in academia where people think someone just got a job or a grant or a promotion because they are female, black or latino. That way white men can feel better about themselves. 

I respect women or minority who are capable and are suitable for the position @PilliBeta

there are couple of female engineers who are super intelligent.

I am complaining about those who are promoted just because of diversity quota rather than their talent and screw others

  • Upvote 1
Posted
28 minutes ago, tom bhayya said:

Diversity has nothing to do with state govt, it’s industry decision. 

No state laws mandate chesa dam start aindi @tom bhayya recent ballot lo pettaru ma county lo

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...