narsy Posted December 30, 2020 Report Posted December 30, 2020 2 minutes ago, Killer66 said: The Court observed that archaeological evidence from the Archaeological Survey of India shows that the Babri Masjid was constructed on a "structure", whose architecture was distinctly indigenous and non-Islamic. edi ra chepinde SC nuvu brain lo yedi fix ithey adi chepadhu court halwey key ball mee bathukulaki, ippudu Babri masjid judgement direct ga choopettaali anukunta. ayna siggu lekunda argue chestaremo.. choopiyaala? Quote
Killer66 Posted December 30, 2020 Report Posted December 30, 2020 1 minute ago, narsy said: are you like fcuking dumb, to copy and paste something that I specifically said was a wrong claim in my following posts? SC did not uphold the ASI report. Its common knowledge. mari edi enti ra The Court observed that archaeological evidence from the Archaeological Survey of India shows that the Babri Masjid was constructed on a "structure", whose architecture was distinctly indigenous and non-Islamic. Quote
Mirage Posted December 30, 2020 Report Posted December 30, 2020 3 minutes ago, narsy said: are you like fcuking dumb, to copy and paste something that I specifically said was a wrong claim in my following posts? SC did not uphold the ASI report. Its common knowledge. Enduku ra frustrate avthunav. You obviously edited your post. If you’re honest enough you would’ve admitted that you have erred. But that’s too much to expect from an asshole like you 1 Quote
Killer66 Posted December 30, 2020 Report Posted December 30, 2020 1 minute ago, narsy said: mee bathukulaki, ippudu Babri masjid judgement direct ga choopettaali anukunta. ayna siggu lekunda argue chestaremo.. choopiyaala? siggu lekunda nuvey kadha topic nuche inko topic ki jumping, orayi adi official dhi ra, wiki lo kooda vuntundi choodu, malla nii liberal media channels tesukuni vachi edi judgement ani chepaku Quote
Mirage Posted December 30, 2020 Report Posted December 30, 2020 1 minute ago, Killer66 said: mari edi enti ra The Court observed that archaeological evidence from the Archaeological Survey of India shows that the Babri Masjid was constructed on a "structure", whose architecture was distinctly indigenous and non-Islamic. Nuvvu enni chupichina vaadi delusional world la vaadu brathukutaadu.. piccha naayala gaadu Quote
narsy Posted December 30, 2020 Report Posted December 30, 2020 Just now, Mirage said: Enduku ra frustrate avthunav. You obviously edited your post. If you’re honest enough you would’ve admitted that you have erred. But that’s too much to expect from an asshole like you I edited it because I assumed that the report claimed that ASI was not accepted by SC, which I know is true since I remember it well. then I read the thing again, and was surprised that they claim that SC upheld ASI report. what's there to admit, dumbfcuk? do you understand how logic works? are you now claiming that ASI report was accepted or rejected by SC? because I'm confused what you are mocking me for. Quote
Killer66 Posted December 30, 2020 Report Posted December 30, 2020 1 minute ago, Mirage said: Nuvvu enni chupichina vaadi delusional world la vaadu brathukutaadu.. piccha naayala gaadu nenu adey cheptuna, pity endi antey vadu delusional lo vunadhu ani vadike telusu but bayataki ralekapotunadhu . Quote
narsy Posted December 30, 2020 Report Posted December 30, 2020 2 minutes ago, Killer66 said: siggu lekunda nuvey kadha topic nuche inko topic ki jumping, orayi adi official dhi ra, wiki lo kooda vuntundi choodu, malla nii liberal media channels tesukuni vachi edi judgement ani chepaku arey babri masjid judgement was not based on ASI report. SC did not uphold the report. lol. brainless pakodi laaga, nuvvu aa mirage gaadu edho vaaguthunnaru.. wait babri masjid judgement thavvutha... wait. Quote
Mirage Posted December 30, 2020 Report Posted December 30, 2020 1 minute ago, narsy said: I edited it because I assumed that the report claimed that ASI was not accepted by SC, which I know is true since I remember it well. then I read the thing again, and was surprised that they claim that SC upheld ASI report. what's there to admit, dumbfcuk? do you understand how logic works? are you now claiming that ASI report was accepted or rejected by SC? because I'm confused what you are mocking me for. Ne bonda ra. Neeku argument cheyyaneeki chaathakaadu. Frustration thoni edo vaaguthav. Dashabdam nundi ide sollu vaaguthu kaalam gadipesthunav Quote
Mirage Posted December 30, 2020 Report Posted December 30, 2020 2 minutes ago, narsy said: I edited it because I assumed that the report claimed that ASI was not accepted by SC, which I know is true since I remember it well. then I read the thing again, and was surprised that they claim that SC upheld ASI report. what's there to admit, dumbfcuk? do you understand how logic works? are you now claiming that ASI report was accepted or rejected by SC? because I'm confused what you are mocking me for. Ade confusion lo continue aipo..baaga set aithadi neeku Quote
Sachin200 Posted December 30, 2020 Report Posted December 30, 2020 14 minutes ago, narsy said: so this fcukface makes up a new claim everytime he's interviewed aa? lol. Court ASI report lo temple dates back to 13 the century Report lacks reasons for destruction of pre-existing or the pre-existing one was destructed for the construction of mosque. Also four centuries time gap evidence ledhu But originally akkada temple undhi from the ASI report annaru and it should be read contextually Ani anaru Quote
Killer66 Posted December 30, 2020 Report Posted December 30, 2020 Just now, narsy said: arey babri masjid judgement was not based on ASI report. SC did not uphold the report. lol. brainless pakodi laaga, nuvvu aa mirage gaadu edho vaaguthunnaru.. wait babri masjid judgement thavvutha... wait. orayi aaa statement echinde sc nennu post cheshinde but judgement based on right to faith , yepudu right to faith ana dani consider cheyadam enta nijamo ala kinda statement kooda antey nijam The Court observed that archaeological evidence from the Archaeological Survey of India shows that the Babri Masjid was constructed on a "structure", whose architecture was distinctly indigenous and non-Islamic. ni lanti prefixed brain galu direct ga cheputhey frustration tho sachipotharu ani evidence kani pistundi ani chepinde SC. lekapothey eee patikey BP tho poye vadive. 1 Quote
narsy Posted December 30, 2020 Report Posted December 30, 2020 Just now, Mirage said: Ne bonda ra. Neeku argument cheyyaneeki chaathakaadu. Frustration thoni edo vaaguthav. Dashabdam nundi ide sollu vaaguthu kaalam gadipesthunav nee bondha... frustration emundhi ra bochhu.. I'm just amused at how dumb you guys are. you claim that SC accepted ASI report. and now you are afraid to state it, because you know its not true. SC did not accept ASI report sare na. lol dumbfucks. Quote
narsy Posted December 30, 2020 Report Posted December 30, 2020 1 minute ago, Mirage said: Ade confusion lo continue aipo..baaga set aithadi neeku nuvvu idhey laaga hero build up ichukuntu tirugu... matter emi lekunda. Quote
Mirage Posted December 30, 2020 Report Posted December 30, 2020 Just now, narsy said: nee bondha... frustration emundhi ra bochhu.. I'm just amused at how dumb you guys are. you claim that SC accepted ASI report. and now you are afraid to state it, because you know its not true. SC did not accept ASI report sare na. lol dumbfucks. Alaage. Ala continue aipo ne bubble lo Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.