soodhilodaaram Posted January 10, 2021 Report Posted January 10, 2021 2 minutes ago, dewarist said: Suggest an alternative Encyclopedia.com | Free Online Encyclopedia Ancient History Encyclopedia and any other reliable sources from universities, universities have peer reviews done by other researcher even if they are left leaning, they have to maintain some standard/proof for their theory which is typically missed in wiki, wiki pedia is more like starting point of what not to believe Quote
MRI Posted January 10, 2021 Report Posted January 10, 2021 24 minutes ago, soodhilodaaram said: if Wikipedia is your source of truth after so so much is out about their underlying malpractices, I have nothing to comment, many universities do not allow using wikipedia references anymore hers an advice if you happen to teach your kids to use Wikipedia, Wikipedia has become a propaganda tool, easiest way to find out.. check anything on Hinduism/Vedas you will most likely see portrayed as negative, same practices when in other religions like Jewish is shown as positive, universities are mostly left leaning and happen to influence census based approach of articulating the theory around any topic, there were few more scam that came out regarding their mechanism how they do it, its not on top of my mind, you can research yourselves ekkadikoooo vellipoyav bro.. nenu teenage poragaadini kaadu ivanni vaadadaaniki.. if I see some new company, I do a simple search.. if I need details, may be I have to look into the authenticity but I believe basic information is listed correctly in the top search that comes on Google.. I also know wikipedia can be modified by anyone.. Quote
MRI Posted January 10, 2021 Report Posted January 10, 2021 22 minutes ago, soodhilodaaram said: Encyclopedia.com | Free Online Encyclopedia Ancient History Encyclopedia and any other reliable sources from universities, universities have peer reviews done by other researcher even if they are left leaning, they have to maintain some standard/proof for their theory which is typically missed in wiki, wiki pedia is more like starting point of what not to believe gab.com ledenti bro? Quote
MRI Posted January 10, 2021 Report Posted January 10, 2021 25 minutes ago, soodhilodaaram said: This is a perfect example for EU to break the monopoly just like what happened to Google and Microsoft already in the past empployees hurt ayyarani twitter ninchi POTUS banned, there is bigger game at play, hence the name libtards for liberals ya bro.. no side is right.. edo moral highground vunnattu andaru sollu kodataru.. Quote
soodhilodaaram Posted January 10, 2021 Report Posted January 10, 2021 48 minutes ago, MRI said: gab.com ledenti bro? akkada ichina reference nuvvu adigina question ki link emaina unda ?? so wikipedia tho paatu nee kids ki twitter lo koda reference istaava endi.. aak is pak ..pak is aak padyam telusu kada Quote
soodhilodaaram Posted January 10, 2021 Report Posted January 10, 2021 54 minutes ago, MRI said: ekkadikoooo vellipoyav bro.. nenu teenage poragaadini kaadu ivanni vaadadaaniki.. if I see some new company, I do a simple search.. if I need details, may be I have to look into the authenticity but I believe basic information is listed correctly in the top search that comes on Google.. I also know wikipedia can be modified by anyone.. easy.. Quote
Daaarling Posted January 15, 2021 Report Posted January 15, 2021 On 1/10/2021 at 12:47 PM, dewarist said: No escape. Too much control . Will people start ditching their expensive toys now? I still recall people burning their Nike's after the colin kapernick ad. anduke isheeps annaru Quote
Dosakai Posted January 15, 2021 Report Posted January 15, 2021 ee db lo poster profiles enti mostly NRIs ani artham avtundi. but evadiki english sarigga raatla baaga chadukunnaru ani telusthondi. but mostly guddiga vaadisthunnaru right wing bubble lo unnaru ani clear ayyindi, but mostly regular joes wanting better life for themselves anthe kadha Quote
Dosakai Posted January 15, 2021 Report Posted January 15, 2021 On 1/11/2021 at 3:08 AM, MRI said: ya bro.. no side is right.. edo moral highground vunnattu andaru sollu kodataru.. ee statement ivvataaniki neeku neeku undaali noral high ground. nee side wrong ani oppukovatam oka etthhu.. pakkodi side kooda wrong, so naa ishtamochinattu nenu chesta ani cheppatam inko etthhu. pure escapist reasoning laaga undhi. Quote
sunnam Posted January 15, 2021 Report Posted January 15, 2021 On 1/11/2021 at 8:55 AM, DummyVariable said: idi AWS ki bokka. how come data stored in AWS infrastructure leaked just like that. AWS ki bad name idi. court lo kuda gelavalemu ani Amazon today changed their case defense saying parler members threatening Amazon staff ani. whatever it is court lo debba paduthadi Amazon. Bezos does not have any freaking role to ban 3rd party content. He should follow procedure to limit access to databases rather than straight out ban. Bezos gundu paguluddi Reps tho pettukunte. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.