SC orders farm laws to be put on hold if not it will

[Telugodura456]

SC follows one rule if anything comes from close to delhi and another rule if it comes form far. It did not stop state division even though it was far more brutal. For ram temple it said it must be built but for ayappa it said women must be allowed. A banana republic.

 

If Centre doesn't want to stay farm laws' implementation, we will: SC

https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/if-centre-doesn-t-want-to-stay-farm-laws-implementation-we-will-sc-101610351136297.html

 

 

[Telugodura456]

Farmers hold their protest against the three farm laws at Singhu border. (PTI Photo)(PTI)

INDIA NEWS

If Centre doesn't want to stay farm laws' implementation, we will: SC

A three-judge bench, headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sharad Arvind Bobde, is hearing a batch of petitions against the constitutional validity of the three farm laws, along with the plea to remove protesting farmers.

By HT Correspondent | Edited by Meenakshi Ray, New Delhi

UPDATED ON JAN 11, 2021 02:49 PM IST

The Supreme Court on Monday said it is “extremely disappointed” with the way negotiations are being held between the Centre and the farmers over the three farm laws, which have triggered protests by thousands of agriculturists at Delhi's borders.

A three-judge bench, headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sharad Arvind Bobde, is hearing a batch of petitions, including those filed by DMK lawmaker Tiruchi Siva and RJD's Manoj K Jha, against the constitutional validity of three farm laws, along with the plea to remove protesting farmers.

"What is going on? States are rebelling against your laws," the bench told the Centre. "We are extremely disappointed at the way the government is handling the talks. What consultative process was followed by you before passing the laws? All are up in rebellion against the laws," it added.

[Picheshwar]

ee sc oa ekkuvavutondi

[Joker_007]

atlane antaru tharuvatha thooch antaru...