Anta Assamey Posted January 14, 2021 Report Posted January 14, 2021 Supreme Court stayed the implementation of the farm laws. But the distinction needs to be drawn here. The apex court has not stayed the laws, but has put them on hold. The farmers have been demanding repeal of the controversial farm laws as a precursor to any wider consultations on agri reforms. The government has been rejecting the demands of agitating farmers by insisting that it is only ready for talks on amending the laws rather than repealing them. Thus, the farmers rightly rejected the expert committee setup by Supreme Court. The fear is that such a committee would only help in reducing the momentum in the protests. The apex court has not linked stay to any further hearing on the substantive issues raised in the petitions or by the farmers in the struggle. Instead, the court has setup an “expert committee” which has been directed to submit its report in two months’ time. In fact, the farmers have already rejected such the proposal to setup a committee during their talks with the government. No petitioner has prayed to apex court for setting up of such a committee. Instead of adjudicating on the constitutionality of these laws and the legal competence of the parliament to enact such laws, the court sou moto decided to facilitate mediation in the unresolved process of talks between government and the farmers. The four members appointed to the committee are known supporters of farm laws. How can farmers hope for justice from such a one sided committee. The apex court has not asked the agitating farmer organisations to suggest their representatives. The two farmer leaders on the committee are also supporters of the farm laws. Therefore, the outcome from this committee will most likely be hostile to the farmers’ demands. Such a possible adverse report may be used to stifle the protest. The order concludes by stating that “While we may not stifle a peaceful protest, we think that this extraordinary order of stay of implementation of the farm laws will be perceived as an achievement of the purpose of such protest at least for the present and will encourage the farmers bodies to convince their members to get back to their livelihood, both in order to protect their own lives and health and in order to protect the lives and properties of others”. These observations clearly indicate that the committee report may perhaps be the basis to address the farmers protest. Thus, the basic demand of the farmers cannot be met. Therefore, the farmers resolve to continue their fight against what they perceive to be anti-peasant, pro corporate farm laws. 1 Quote
Picheshwar Posted January 14, 2021 Report Posted January 14, 2021 All 4 members wrote articles or made statements supporting the new laws. Quote
rightwinger91 Posted January 14, 2021 Report Posted January 14, 2021 who are the farmers? people who work in farms or people who park tractors on roads and eat langar pizzas? since last 4 months they havent visited a farm yet they are called farmers Quote
LordOfMud Posted January 14, 2021 Report Posted January 14, 2021 49 minutes ago, Anta Assamey said: 38 minutes ago, Picheshwar said: All 4 members wrote articles or made statements supporting the new laws. 15 minutes ago, rightwinger91 said: who are the farmers? people who work in farms or people who park tractors on roads and eat langar pizzas? since last 4 months they havent visited a farm yet they are called farmers Bhupinder Singh Mann said he is thankful to the apex court for nominating him to the committee but that he would sacrifice any position offered to him so as not to compromise the interests of farmers. Quote
Telugodura456 Posted January 14, 2021 Report Posted January 14, 2021 Simnple bayya - india can never do justice to punjab. As a matter of fact it never did justice to punjab or tamil or andhra. Evaddni discuss cheyyakunda piccha phook laws theccharu opposition vacchesariki govt took it as ego issue. But farmers here are fighers. Quote
odhu_le_macha Posted January 14, 2021 Report Posted January 14, 2021 farmers ante Punjabi gallena.. Quote
rightwinger91 Posted January 14, 2021 Report Posted January 14, 2021 1 hour ago, LordOfMud said: Bhupinder Singh Mann said he is thankful to the apex court for nominating him to the committee but that he would sacrifice any position offered to him so as not to compromise the interests of farmers. again i ask: if the people parking tractors at delhi borders and eating pizzzas are farmers then who are the ones working on the farm fields in punjab right now? 1 Quote
Telugodura456 Posted January 14, 2021 Report Posted January 14, 2021 1 hour ago, odhu_le_macha said: farmers ante Punjabi gallena.. punjabi kallu kadhabba. Malla valla punjab ni valle paalinchukoni. Taxes dobbi merokkarena ante. Quote
psycopk Posted January 14, 2021 Report Posted January 14, 2021 this clearly shows how divided country is... aa gov policies.. laws north gallaki tappa south vallaki ardam kadu patinchukoru.. em country oo ento... 1 Quote
rightwinger91 Posted January 14, 2021 Report Posted January 14, 2021 13 minutes ago, psycopk said: this clearly shows how divided country is... aa gov policies.. laws north gallaki tappa south vallaki ardam kadu patinchukoru.. em country oo ento... who told you south vallaki ardham kaadhu patinchukoru ani? these laws ar ealready benefitting telugu states farmers who ar egoing to karnataka to sell neeku burra thakkuva unte neeku ardham kadu so speak for yourselves Quote
Telugodura456 Posted January 14, 2021 Report Posted January 14, 2021 15 minutes ago, psycopk said: this clearly shows how divided country is... aa gov policies.. laws north gallaki tappa south vallaki ardam kadu patinchukoru.. em country oo ento... south has been crushed bro, Even devudlu kooda. My favourite example - for ram temple supreme court gave atrocious judgement that it must be built exactly where a masjid stood despite no historical proof. But for ayappa it said women must be allwed despite a strong tradition. Kaani south vallu kooda chosthunnamga ee forum lo. Okkadiki vennemuka ledhu. baaga divide ayyarule caste meedha, region meedha. Quote
psycopk Posted January 14, 2021 Report Posted January 14, 2021 19 minutes ago, Telugodura456 said: south has been crushed bro, Even devudlu kooda. My favourite example - for ram temple supreme court gave atrocious judgement that it must be built exactly where a masjid stood despite no historical proof. But for ayappa it said women must be allwed despite a strong tradition. Kaani south vallu kooda chosthunnamga ee forum lo. Okkadiki vennemuka ledhu. baaga divide ayyarule caste meedha, region meedha. we cant even see south as together.. unless the law is directly related to state.. no body cares.. 1 Quote
psycopk Posted January 14, 2021 Report Posted January 14, 2021 22 minutes ago, rightwinger91 said: who told you south vallaki ardham kaadhu patinchukoru ani? these laws ar ealready benefitting telugu states farmers who ar egoing to karnataka to sell neeku burra thakkuva unte neeku ardham kadu so speak for yourselves lol... asalu law gurinchi kuda evadiki teliyadu.. edo hindi lo valla gola valla hungama anukuntaru.. nothing more... 1 Quote
odhu_le_macha Posted January 14, 2021 Report Posted January 14, 2021 41 minutes ago, psycopk said: this clearly shows how divided country is... aa gov policies.. laws north gallaki tappa south vallaki ardam kadu patinchukoru.. em country oo ento... anduke CBN PM kavali Quote
psycopk Posted January 14, 2021 Report Posted January 14, 2021 Just now, odhu_le_macha said: anduke CBN PM kavali if india is meant to develop it will get it... i dont think it deserves as it is divided and never treated as one country Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.