Jump to content

Assam-Mizoram violence is an outcome of BJP trying too hard to 'integrate' distinct northeastern states. This has unleashed latent regionalism


Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, bhaigan said:

BJP timmi ni bammi cheyachu bammi ni timmi cheyachu

BJP can chnage the narrative from anything to anything

the issues in NE predate to BJP only kani ippudu jarguthunna fresh rivalries karanam evaru, BJP power lo unna assam kada ?

BJP is an incompetent party of losers. just HIndutva okati pattukoni nettukoni vasthunnaru.

vaalla bathukki emi teliyadhu inka. Hindutva valla paisa prayojanam ledhu NE lo. evadu aath bhi care cheyyadu

Posted
11 minutes ago, Ryzen_renoir said:

Well to be fair , it was their land before india decised to settle bengali refugees enmasse . 

Basically india fked up the north east region because people in delhi doesn't understand what is going on in there . In 1997 there was only a small bengali presence in Bengal , now they are the majority in many districts .

India promised north east states that they wouldn't change demographics but violated it heavily during 1970-80

asalu mana desam lo 2 states cops 6 hours air lo mz gruns tho fyring anedi recent years lo epudanna chusama

Posted
1 minute ago, bhaigan said:

asalu mana desam lo 2 states cops 6 hours air lo mz gruns tho fyring anedi recent years lo epudanna chusama

Utter failure of home ministry .he's too busy doing politics in delhi

Posted
13 minutes ago, Ryzen_renoir said:

Well to be fair , it was their land before india decised to settle bengali refugees enmasse . 

Basically india fked up the north east region because people in delhi doesn't understand what is going on in there . In 1997 there was only a small bengali presence in Bengal , now they are the majority in many districts .

India promised north east states that they wouldn't change demographics but violated it heavily during 1970-80

If you are talking about 1971 refugee resettlement, then yes. But claims of Assamese go beyond that. That every bengali that they think is not Assamese before that 1971 influx should be made to go through the humiliation of NRC process.

Also its not 'their' land. I don't know what that even means. We are not talking here about the tribal groups here, but Axomiyas. How is it their land? why because Ahom Kingdom only had Assamese subjects or what? lol.

fcuking assholes every single one of them who claims this. Talking to them made me realise Hindutva fcuks have atleast a little of heart.

Posted
1 minute ago, Ryzen_renoir said:

Utter failure of home ministry .he's too busy doing politics in delhi

Intha racha jaruguthunapudu why modi and shah silent ?

Is this not failure of BJP govt in center ?

Posted
3 minutes ago, Ryzen_renoir said:

Utter failure of home ministry .he's too busy doing politics in delhi

BJP is incompetent in every way. vaadi kaallu veedi kaallu, koncham dabbulu ichhi power lo ochina states NE region lo.

They can't do sh1t in those states. They don't control the agenda.

Posted
1 minute ago, Raven_Rayes said:

BJP is incompetent in every way. vaadi kaallu veedi kaallu, koncham dabbulu ichhi power lo ochina states NE region lo.

They can't do sh1t in those states. They don't control the agenda.

Kallu pattukovadam kadu bro , dabbule ichi power lo ki vacharu NE lo

Posted

Claiming Assam is Axomiya land is like claiming Madras is Telugu land, or that Tirupathi is Tamil land.

fcuking silly, and laughable claim. It may one of the most dangerous ethnic movements right now in India.

only thing is they are not trying to split India. Instead using India to achieve their ends. Disenfranchise bengalis in their own land.

Posted

but I don't think Assamese nationalists are involved in the conflict with mizos now. 

pretty sure mizos are some kind of fcuked up ethnonationalist scum, that drove out a minority in their region.

and these scumbags want India to honor their promise. lol.

Posted
37 minutes ago, Ryzen_renoir said:

Well to be fair , it was their land before india decised to settle bengali refugees enmasse . 

Basically india fked up the north east region because people in delhi doesn't understand what is going on in there . In 1997 there was only a small bengali presence in Bengal , now they are the majority in many districts .

India promised north east states that they wouldn't change demographics but violated it heavily during 1970-80

There were always a huge number of bengalis in that area, dude. Assamese nationalists just handle the fact that they are not the majority in their state.

 

Posted
4 hours ago, bhaigan said:

give autonomy or respect their Line of actions (boundaries) that should be enough, BJP policy laga one nation one eveything laga roju gelukuthu unte valu edo oka roju tiragabadutharu

ekkuva force chesthe pedda udyam kuda ravachu, past lo already akkada udyalu jarigina place, inkoka cashmeer kavala cheppu

If you start giving autonomy to the regions in India, we would end up with 1000+ autonomous (call whatever or princely states). Majority of them would be Southern India!!!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...