futureofandhra Posted August 12, 2021 Author Report Posted August 12, 2021 1 minute ago, pahelwan1 said: Beach road mothaniki motham ga 10gipoddi bro its clearly mentioned some parts of vizag ani nothing big vizag submerging ni ekkadaa cheppaaledhu Quote
Popular Post Netflixmovieguz Posted August 12, 2021 Popular Post Report Posted August 12, 2021 Just now, futureofandhra said: its clearly mentioned some parts of vizag ani nothing big vizag submerging ni ekkadaa cheppaaledhu Urgent ga amaravati vellipodam 3 Quote
NiranjanGaaru Posted August 12, 2021 Report Posted August 12, 2021 Amaravati not fit for capital. ....... Flood prone zone Due to soil type construction cost will be 2,3 times higher 1 Quote
futureofandhra Posted August 12, 2021 Author Report Posted August 12, 2021 7 minutes ago, NiranjanGaaru said: Amaravati not fit for capital. ....... Flood prone zone Due to soil type construction cost will be 2,3 times higher pleaase post if u have report on this Quote
kdapparao Posted August 12, 2021 Report Posted August 12, 2021 1 hour ago, futureofandhra said: Rising sea levels to devour parts of Vizag by 2100: IPCC | Visakhapatnam News - Times of India (indiatimes.com) 2100 ante mana Devansh anna CM ga untadu.. taata polika kada apesghadu bus vesukoni velli beach lo padukoni antuna pacha media @futureofandhra @Somedude @ticket @Swatkat Quote
futureofandhra Posted August 12, 2021 Author Report Posted August 12, 2021 Just now, kdapparao said: 2100 ante mana Devansh anna CM ga untadu.. taata polika kada apesghadu bus vesukoni velli beach lo padukoni antuna pacha media @futureofandhra @Somedude @ticket @Swatkat waakeup stop watchin blue media timesofindiaa Quote
kdapparao Posted August 12, 2021 Report Posted August 12, 2021 4 minutes ago, futureofandhra said: waakeup stop watchin blue media timesofindiaa Bulgu media lo devansh anna CM ani vesara bro? 1 Quote
Popular Post NiranjanGaaru Posted August 12, 2021 Popular Post Report Posted August 12, 2021 14 minutes ago, futureofandhra said: pleaase post if u have report on this Sivaramakrishnan committee report Why Not Amaravati? The Committee had several concerns about concentrating government functions within the Vijayawada-Guntur-Tenali- Mangalagiri (VGTM) urban area — where Amaravati currently is, and which the state government was then most keen on. It felt that though this area had geographic centrality, that was not an essential requirement: states like Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu and West Bengal do not have this centrality. There was a major concern about losing the best agricultural lands in the country in the process, as Krishna, Guntur and West Godavari districts form the `rice bowl’ of the country. Also, it would lead to unemployment because, for instance, 65 per cent people in Guntur and 56 per cent in Krishna district are cultivators and agricultural laborers. They would be displaced if the lands on the proposed ‘Ring Road’ were converted to non-agricultural use. Small holdings would disappear and so would farmers. Real estate operators would be the only beneficiaries, whose profits would surge from speculation related to land. This warning of the Committee has indeed been witnessed: land prices soared artificially — on only the promise of future development, rather than any real increase in the worth of the land. “The present development plan for the VGTM area with its Ring Road seeks to bring more land under urbanization… and this would have serious economic consequences (Unlike in Hyderabad where irrigated agricultural land was not an issue)...” Moreover, locating government offices and institutions within the Vijayawada-Guntur urban area may lead to a construction boom and haphazard development, which may seriously strain the existing infrastructure including water supply, sewerage and roads, which were already showing some stress The Committee cited findings of the Geological Survey of India: that a seismic micro-zonation had highlighted the problem of high water table and vulnerable soil types, which together may lead to severe problems of foundations and soil bearing capacities. Reportedly, this was one of the reasons there weren’t many high-rise buildings in this area. Yet, what has been witnessed is in total contrast to the cautionary advice of the Expert Committee. APCRDA’s major works began with lavish residences for legislators and gazetted and non-gazetted officers in several high-rise building complexes. This was in total contrast to the caution advised by the Expert Committee. Having studied the history of new-capital-city development across the world, the Committee had realized that: a) the average period of development of the capital city ranges from 6 to 20 years; and b) for a greenfield city, a critical mass of 0.5-1 million population is reached only after 20-30 years of the initial development period. This meant a period of 40-50 years from conception. The Committee warned that Andhra Pradesh “needed to be very cautious about large-scale greenfield development”, to avoid multi-decade gestation periods, and instead build on existing urban areas. The Committee also warned about the “completely unrealistic articulation of capital investments”. At 10-30 times the investments made in similar projects in India, these were unthinkable — given the economic status of the state and the fiscal challenges of the central government. Report of the Expert Committee on the New Capital for Andhra Pradesh 31 August 2014 ByK C SIVARAMAKRISHNAN, K T RAVINDARAN, AROMAR REVI, RATHIN ROY, JAGAN SHAH, ARINDAM JANA, BHANU JOSHI, NITHIN K, RAEESA VAKIL, RAJEEV R @undarware_troller @JustChill_Mama @ysshakeela @gothamprince 2 1 Quote
NiranjanGaaru Posted August 12, 2021 Report Posted August 12, 2021 10 minutes ago, futureofandhra said: waakeup stop watchin blue media timesofindiaa Pulka of andhra don't speak with me... Like. U do with other.... Jaffas, bhakts, langas and sainks.... I always check the facts before I post here @undarware_trollerbro ela icham...!!? 1 Quote
Veeriveera Posted August 12, 2021 Report Posted August 12, 2021 2 minutes ago, NiranjanGaaru said: Pulka of andhra don't speak with me... Like. U do with other.... Jaffas, bhakts, langas and sainks.... I always check the facts before I post here 🤣😂😂😂😂😂 2 Quote
NiranjanGaaru Posted August 12, 2021 Report Posted August 12, 2021 @futureofandhra what are your intentions in posting this thread Quote
Netflixmovieguz Posted August 12, 2021 Report Posted August 12, 2021 1 minute ago, NiranjanGaaru said: @futureofandhra what are your intentions in posting this thread He is a silent jagan follower Quote
NiranjanGaaru Posted August 12, 2021 Report Posted August 12, 2021 Uttarandhra seperate state chesi pardengandi.... E eddies and cammas tho mem undalem...... Quote
futureofandhra Posted August 12, 2021 Author Report Posted August 12, 2021 9 minutes ago, NiranjanGaaru said: Pulka of andhra don't speak with me... Like. U do with other.... Jaffas, bhakts, langas and sainks.... I always check the facts before I post here @undarware_trollerbro ela icham...!!? andhuke report vundha ani adigithey paai reply ichav pulka chapathi tho no use Quote
NiranjanGaaru Posted August 12, 2021 Report Posted August 12, 2021 Just now, Netflixmovieguz said: He is a silent jagan follower Ok Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.