Biden did right thing and showed Moral courage

[Raven_Rayes]

1 minute ago, Smarty_1 said:

Kashmir india di ani nuvve cheppav ga inkenti poyi paduko inka

He's paraphrasing the stupid arguments from guys like you bro. He didn't say what you think he said.

No one with a brain cell will say that Kashmir is India's

[Smarty_1]

Just now, Raven_Rayes said:

He's paraphrasing the stupid arguments from guys like you bro. He didn't say what you think he said.

No one with a brain cell will say that Kashmir is India's

Haha, okay inka kaani nee edupu… neeku variki unna prathi cell is against india and hinduism ani andariki telsu le

[Raven_Rayes]

3 minutes ago, Smarty_1 said:

Haha, okay inka kaani nee edupu… neeku variki unna prathi cell is against india and hinduism ani andariki telsu le

I'm for truth. Not a brainless sheep that blindly follows it's flock.

[Smarty_1]

Just now, Raven_Rayes said:

I'm for truth. Not a brainless sheep that blindly follows it's flock.

Im no way interested in following a child molester u can…

[Raven_Rayes]

3 minutes ago, Smarty_1 said:

Im no way interested in following a child molester u can…

Lol. 

[donuts]

4 hours ago, Telugodura456 said:

Biden said America has no job occupying another country. No job telling them how to rule and who to rule. Thats a decent man with decent thoughts. Operationally something can go awry it doesnt matter he has the right heart.

WIll India ever show the same courage on kashmir ? occupy another people land.

arey first neeku Afghanistan esp Taliban's gurinchi ami telusura neeku soodiga........u didnt even know why in the first place USA controlled AFG. keep this topic aside.. there is no point discussing on this with u

WIll India ever show the same courage on Kashmir ? occupy another people land

other peoples land endhi ra babu.... indian army didn't set foot in to kasmir untill Kashmir king asked for help and gave control of important segments in region to save his people. both Pakistan and Kashmir part of "Akhand BHARATH"

Pakistan and Kashmir never been an independent countries before 1947 to be occupied. even Pakistan belongs to current india before partition and Kashmir is princely state. india never occupied kashmir it was returned (not given) to them in unfortunate situations and conditions...if india has Occupation mentality it should have occupied PAK like Chania doing to its neighbor's. so never ever talk about India in a such a low phase  

what rite Pakistan have on Kashmir u tell me.. except for religion they dont have anything in common with Kashmir ... thay want Kashmir because they can have strategic advantage over india and train terrorists there.

if Pakistan has been a very good neighbor like usa/canada....india might have declared Kashmir as a union territory...but because PAk  and their infiltrations in to Kashmir ...india cont. take that risk 

 

let me tell u i am not a fan  modi and bjp....so my option on Kashmir issue independent of politics and religion....its about nation interest and what is right

[donuts]

6 hours ago, Raven_Rayes said:

He's paraphrasing the stupid arguments from guys like you bro. He didn't say what you think he said.

No one with a brain cell will say that Kashmir is India's

Kashmir is india's..i bet i have lot more brain cells than u...below is the map of india (AKHAND BHARAT) in early 1750's.. i want u to look at it and say where is Kashmir in that map...

so dont bring ur 10th class history knowledge to adults discussions  

[pakeer_saab]

4 hours ago, Telugodura456 said:

kasmhir belongs to india but people living there dont. Land kabja chesi goonda gaadi mentality adhi.

No wonder world sees indians as a joke. Most are generally uncomfortable when a indian enters to give speeches.

most run away when they see turak giving speech, eppudu Ola Uber ani dahamal chestaremo ani, uncomfortable is better than destruction

[donuts]

who ever says Kashmir doent belongs to India or india occupied Kashmir are traitors out of history ignore.

Below is the correct statement about kashmir and india relation.

"Kashmir has been returned  to its rite full owner INDIA in 1948 in unfortunate conditions".

 

[Telugodura456]

10 minutes ago, donuts said:

Kashmir is india's..i bet i have lot more brain cells than u...below is the map of india (AKHAND BHARAT) in early 1750's.. i want to look at it and say where is Kashmir in that map...

so dont bring ur 10th call history knowledge to adults discussions  

Thats british territory. By the way those days indonesians were also called indians, native americans were also called indians. Make another map showing all of it as india.

[donuts]

1 hour ago, Telugodura456 said:

Thats british territory. By the way those days indonesians were also called indians, native americans were also called indians. Make another map showing all of it as india.

ohh those are British territories ohh wow!!!...that mens pakisthan, india and afganisthan, bangladesh, nepal and some parts of china has occupied the great Britain NOW ....

what a logic ra babu...your  hate for india   is at peaks.... because of people like you BJP and this idiot Bodi becoming Pm of india...its easy for them to make people rally behind them showing example like you.

By the way Columbus want to find a shortest trade route to india, in his adventures journey  thought he reached india but it was USA. he saw some indigenous people   living in USA at that point of time called them indians because he tought he was in india...that how indians term in USA came up.. not because once up on a time actual indian's(i mean dravidians) lived there.

so stop bringing ur  Turkish logics  here ok.

[Telugodura456]

47 minutes ago, donuts said:

ohh those are British territories ohh wow!!!...that mens pakisthan, india and afganisthan, bangladesh, nepal and some parts of china has occupied the great Britain NOW ....

what a logic ra babu...your  hate for india   is at peaks.... because of people like you BJP and this idiot Bodi becoming Pm of india...its easy for them to make people rally behind them showing example like you.

By the way Columbus want to find a shortest trade route to india, in his adventures journey  thought he reached india but it was USA. he saw some indigenous people   living in USA at that point of time called them indians because he tought he was in india...that how indians term in USA came up.. not because once up on a time actual indian's(i mean dravidians) lived there.

so stop bringing ur  Turkish logics  here ok.

indian = person of indigenous origin without any clear cultural marker(as per europeans). Europeans called anyone who is brown and whose culture they couldnt undersstand as "indians". Its like calling black people using the N word. Even after india was found indonesia was called east indies. Barbados etc was called west indies .

THe only way we can come out this humiliating term is to adopt language like everyone else.

[donuts]

2 hours ago, Telugodura456 said:

indian = person of indigenous origin without any clear cultural marker(as per europeans). Europeans called anyone who is brown and whose culture they couldnt undersstand as "indians". Its like calling black people using the N word. Even after india was found indonesia was called east indies. Barbados etc was called west indies .

THe only way we can come out this humiliating term is to adopt language like everyone else.

as per ur logic.. Columbus also explored west indies islands ..but he didnt called them "Indians" but he named place after india calling it as west indies..because he found those islands while trying to find trade route to india from west.

Indonesia is found  by portages for india ...after that it was fist occupied by Dutch east india company that is the main reason they called east india and people lived in there called east indians and it is also in indain ocean and have indus river flow through these lands like india ..

The Indies or East Indies is a term that has been used to describe the lands of South and South East Asia, occupying all of the present India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Myanmar, Nepal, Bhutan, Sri Lanka, the Maldives, mostly Indonesia, Thailand, Cambodia, Laos, Vietnam, Brunei, Singapore, the Philippines, East Timor, and Malaysia. In a more restricted sense, the Indies can be used to refer to the islands of South East Asia, especially the Malay Archipelago. The name "Indies" is derived from the river Indus and is used to connote parts of Asia that came under Indian cultural influence. Dutch-held colonies in the area were known as the Dutch East Indies before Indonesian independence

but no actual indian's never lived there nor any king from india established a kingdom or occupied one....so that why AKHAND BHARATH doesnt have them in their map. 

 

why Columbus called indigenous people in USA as indians...because the first few indigenous people Columbus faced are in brown in color. thats one of the main reasons columbus thought he was in india while he was in USA. it took few days for him to realize he is in USA not in india after seeing their living habbits which doent matches with indian living habits mentioned in earlier travel journals by previous explorers like vasgotigama and Marco polo .

 

you need to reed multiple history books and keep on researching on the history to know is well and then do discussions on it as history has many faces because it was told by different people with varying takes on what happend then. insted of just framing and believing in things out of contemporary situations. 

this is the real meaning of indian

In·di·an

1.

a native or inhabitant of India, or a person of Indian descent.

2.

a member of any of the indigenous peoples of North, Central, and South America, especially those of North America.

not all indigenous people called Indians ....only especially people in north America (USA) called indians and actuall people from country india

 

 

[Prasadgeek33]

9 hours ago, Telugodura456 said:

Biden said America has no job occupying another country. No job telling them how to rule and who to rule. Thats a decent man with decent thoughts. Operationally something can go awry it doesnt matter he has the right heart.

WIll India ever show the same courage on kashmir ? occupy another people land.

Whose land who occupied. Us did not occupy and steal gold from afghanistan. It is a dust bowl and will remain so, US gave them a chance, but Afghanis proved that they are an unruly bunch and will always live in a hole set in 7th century.

[Telugodura456]

Just now, Prasadgeek33 said:

Whose land who occupied. Us did not occupy and steal gold from afghanistan. It is a dust bowl and will remain so, US gave them a chance, but Afghanis proved that they are an unruly bunch and will always live in a hole set in 7th century.

I hope nobody gives you a "chance" to improve by putting guns to your face, invading your houses and bombing from 30k feet.