Endowments regulation act

[JustChill_Mama]

reasonable 

[Ryzen_renoir]

Terrible policy , I hope the courts struck it  down .

If officials and politicians are responsible for half the corruption in temples then the priests are responsible for the other half . 

Especially the entrenched family based ones who are in the same temple for generations . 

 

[galiraju]

Also, endowments shud include churches and mosques, jain temples and gurudwars lol secularly speaking

[JustChill_Mama]

1 hour ago, Ryzen_renoir said:

Terrible policy , I hope the courts struck it  down .

If officials and politicians are responsible for half the corruption in temples then the priests are responsible for the other half . 

Especially the entrenched family based ones who are in the same temple for generations . 

 

Family based ante akkada  entrance test kuda untundhi kadha ... valla family nunchi Evaru lekapothe govt have all the rights to appoint someone who cleared praveresha & vara test. 
 

moreover, priests should not have any chance to do corruption because in most of the temples endowment department is not even providing necessary things like milk , yougurt, ghee etc for abhisheka & dhupa , dheepa, naivedya.... even in 6A grade temples also endowment department is not providing that ...  

[JustChill_Mama]

56 minutes ago, galiraju said:

Also, endowments shud include churches and mosques, jain temples and gurudwars lol secularly speaking

Yes. But if the govt do so, minorities will not even vote them in future . So they won’t do 

[JustChill_Mama]

There are almost like 10000-50K cases in high court related to this  I guess 😂 

ttd employees itself file atleast 1000 cases in a year. However, they got favorable decision in most of the cases. That’s why previous executive officers like Pvrk Prasad used to re-think about some decisions. even for that 65 years retirement act one of the priest from telangana filed a case in high court to decrease the retirement age to 58. Some employees are ready to retire at 58 years itself.but court decision is not favor to them.