Jump to content

Another Surgical Strike cum Monster Stroke - National monetization pipeline anta!! - Sale of Railways, highways, power Infra, etc etc.,


Recommended Posts

Posted
8 minutes ago, tacobell fan said:

that's why I told you are emotionally distressed towards the topic rather than practically believe in progress. 

Lol. Makes no sense. 

You are arguing with an image of me on your head, instead of with what i post.

Posted
Just now, Raven_Rayes said:

Lol. Makes no sense. 

You are arguing with an image of me on your head, instead of with what i post.

No, I do not. I am giving you examples on how real super powers are progressing to be a super power and you said "I think" instead supporting the basic facts on what India is doing to even support basic needs but you "believe/guess" India will be super power. Super Power means everything including self sustainability and growth, not a sake of super power. 

Posted
17 minutes ago, tacobell fan said:

what option do you have to produce Oil and other natural resources like gas to power billion people? 

Neither does china have oil/gas. Nor does japan, nor does korea, nor does germany, nor does taiwan.

Posted
Just now, Telugodura456 said:

Neither does china have oil/gas. Nor does japan, nor does korea, nor does germany, nor does taiwan.

Sure, that's why they are buying. India also doing and andhuke people here opposing while i'm not

Posted
22 minutes ago, dasari4kntr said:

Its the matter of how balance the welfare and development is…

too much of privatization is not good…private companies provide services where profit comes…and they ignore rest…

recent example i read…one girl  from small village who needs to travel everday to school…there is govt bus is running for that girl alone that is welfare….but what if private companies took over transportation …such small villages or small girls (who cant give profits) can get access..?

I think the immediate goal of govts should be moving the remote rural population to urban areas asap . 

It's much harder to address needs of people in remote places , doctors don't go there , schools are absent , electricity is costlier , road infra isn't there .  

Affordable Urbanisation is the need of the hour , especially from underdeveloped areas 

Posted
1 minute ago, tacobell fan said:

Sure, that's why they are buying. India also doing and andhuke people here opposing while i'm not

what what what. What are they buying and what is india also doing and what are people here opposing.

Posted
1 hour ago, tacobell fan said:

India doesn't have access to enough natural resources on our own to support it's Billion Plus population given the size of our country. These things bound to happen more and more and it's just tip of the iceberg. 

India is rewarding states with high population growth with more funds , more parliament seats. 

Why would states promote population control anymore ?

Posted
3 minutes ago, Ryzen_renoir said:

India is rewarding states with high population growth with more funds , more parliament seats. 

Why would states promote population control anymore ?

We lack discipline in several ways. No comments.

  • Haha 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Ryzen_renoir said:

I think the immediate goal of govts should be moving the remote rural population to urban areas asap . 

It's much harder to address needs of people in remote places , doctors don't go there , schools are absent , electricity is costlier , road infra isn't there .  

Affordable Urbanisation is the need of the hour , especially from underdeveloped areas 

Too much urbanization is wrong strategy…

even early congress guys also told “grama swaraj” but later congress did exactly opposite…

nothing learned from “covid long march”….

 

Posted
18 minutes ago, tacobell fan said:

No, I do not. I am giving you examples on how real super powers are progressing to be a super power and you said "I think" instead supporting the basic facts on what India is doing to even support basic needs but you "believe/guess" India will be super power. Super Power means everything including self sustainability and growth, not a sake of super power. 

Wow.. If I understand you right, you are saying that I'm too emotional about a future where India could see severe famines, and that selling off assets is another step in that direction. And that all this is inevitable.

you are way more cynical than I thought. I hope Indians are sensitive to their needs more than you.

But obviously, I think you are wrong. But I'll stop here, because you'll call me emotional because I will bring up a completely different angle to this conversation. You've already decided to be above the fray. Lets just hope you are wrong.

Posted
11 minutes ago, Ryzen_renoir said:

I think the immediate goal of govts should be moving the remote rural population to urban areas asap . 

It's much harder to address needs of people in remote places , doctors don't go there , schools are absent , electricity is costlier , road infra isn't there .  

Affordable Urbanisation is the need of the hour , especially from underdeveloped areas 

to move rural peopel to urban areas you need ti build new cities like china does. that means amaravati. Ippudu nee sollu modhaledthav "affordable urbanization". paamu ki rendu naalkulanni antaaru. Neekenno.

Posted
Just now, dasari4kntr said:

Too much urbanization is wrong strategy…

even early congress guys also told “grama swaraj” but later congress did exactly opposite…

nothing learned from “covid long march”….

 

Too much urbanization is applicable when you achieve fundamental needs, we are struggling to even get there and without urbanization you cannot support people to make money for living when we have a democratic system. How can you feed people with no property? 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Raven_Rayes said:

Wow.. If I understand you right, you are saying that I'm too emotional about a future where India could see severe famines, and that selling off assets is another step in that direction. And that all this is inevitable.

you are way more cynical than I thought. I hope Indians are sensitive to their needs more than you.

But obviously, I think you are wrong. But I'll stop here, because you'll call me emotional because I will bring up a completely different angle to this conversation. You've already decided to be above the fray. Lets just hope you are wrong.

Selling assets for what? To pay, if we have enough liquidity why would they sell? Are you missing something? or I am missing?

Posted
4 minutes ago, Raven_Rayes said:

Wow.. If I understand you right, you are saying that I'm too emotional about a future where India could see severe famines, and that selling off assets is another step in that direction. And that all this is inevitable.

you are way more cynical than I thought. I hope Indians are sensitive to their needs more than you.

But obviously, I think you are wrong. But I'll stop here, because you'll call me emotional because I will bring up a completely different angle to this conversation. You've already decided to be above the fray. Lets just hope you are wrong.

Other than talking logical points come up with a real meaningful conversation to prove and support your theories of becoming super power. Believing has no face value. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...