who ruled bhagyanagaram before razakars

[langa_reality]

11 minutes ago, reality said:

There was no such delineation as Andhra or Telangana during the time of ancient kingdoms. It seems like, evadi hawa entha sagithe vadi kingdom boundaries antha undevi… Likeminded kingdoms alliance undevi… and so people used to share their common interests and hardships, and cooperate with each other (don’t confuse this with the modern day Samaikyandhra argument).

But extended nizam rule of Hyderabad region (current Telangana) and extended British rule of Madras state (current Andhra) brought huge cultural and development disparities between the regions. Telangana region had to endure rajakar bastards towards the end of nizam rule and got its freedom one year after India did. While the region was in the repair mode from 1948 - 1956, has its own CM etc… during which a completely different territory (like said above, culture and development disparities) called Andhra state (which itself got detached from Madras state in 1953) was proposed and lobbied to be merged with Hyderabad state in the guise of state partition on the basis of language (what a foolish measure!).

Then Telangana politicians succumbed… by trusting the various agreements and protections offered to people of Hyderabad region, Mulki rules (gentleman’s agreement etc)… Telugu state formed in 1956 and all those protections were put in trash… slowly command changed… injustice and unfairness continued by ruling CMs. 1969 TG separation fight… 610 GO failure… still injustice continued. Finally Telangana formed in 2014.

Rey uppal baal ga appudu Andhra to kalisindi kabatte ipudu Hyderabad develop ayi adukutine Telangana valaki cash cow aindi.  Nee lanti langa gorelaki teliyadu ley

[ticket]

2 hours ago, reality said:

There was no such delineation as Andhra or Telangana during the time of ancient kingdoms. It seems like, evadi hawa entha sagithe vadi kingdom boundaries antha undevi… Likeminded kingdoms alliance undevi… and so people used to share their common interests and hardships, and cooperate with each other (don’t confuse this with the modern day Samaikyandhra argument).

But extended nizam rule of Hyderabad region (current Telangana) and extended British rule of Madras state (current Andhra) brought huge cultural and development disparities between the regions. Telangana region had to endure rajakar bastards towards the end of nizam rule and got its freedom one year after India did. While the region was in the repair mode from 1948 - 1956, has its own CM etc… during which a completely different territory (like said above, culture and development disparities) called Andhra state (which itself got detached from Madras state in 1953) was proposed and lobbied to be merged with Hyderabad state in the guise of state partition on the basis of language (what a foolish measure!).

Then Telangana politicians succumbed… by trusting the various agreements and protections offered to people of Hyderabad region, Mulki rules (gentleman’s agreement etc)… Telugu state formed in 1956 and all those protections were put in trash… slowly command changed… injustice and unfairness continued by ruling CMs. 1969 TG separation fight… 610 GO failure… still injustice continued. Finally Telangana formed in 2014.

Which region was more developed before 1956? What makes you think andra was desperate for merger. 

[futureofandhra]

8 hours ago, JackSeal said:

Yeah just like andhra history and potti sriramulu ne telangana valla pai rudhi nattu. 

History books lo two parts untai one ancient and other modern history. School lo history sakkaga sadvaledha ?

Stop fake stuff 

I have studied about sardar jamalapuram kesava  rao 

Am talking about entire country

Why are you bringing tg here 

[halwa_fan]

 i doubt if the current existing castes really existed back than.. many historians claim the current castes developed during vijayanagara empire time. 

but constant infighting among warrior castes back than was the reason for no strong telugu kingdoms after kakatiyas.. 

[halwa_fan]

3 hours ago, ticket said:

Which region was more developed before 1956? What makes you think andra was desperate for merger. 

Human development was definitely better in Andhra compared to TG.. & and obviously the merger was hugely pushed by Andhra politicians.. No doubt in it. 

[reality]

4 hours ago, ticket said:

 What makes you think andra was desperate for merger. 

In spite of andhra political lobbying for merger that started from 1951, there was SRC recommendation which opposed the merger in 1955, asking to take 2/3rd majority from HYD state legislature after 1961 elections, if at all such merger is to happen.

Antha clear ga cheppina kuda, vadhalakunda Visalandra movement chesi… gentleman's agreement ani kathalu cheppi… finally merged… in 1956…

You tell who is desperate now?

[futureofandhra]

2 minutes ago, reality said:

In spite of andhra political lobbying for merger that started from 1951, there was SRC recommendation which opposed the merger in 1955, asking to take 2/3rd majority from HYD state legislature after 1961 elections, if at all such merger is to happen.

Antha clear ga cheppina kuda, vadhalakunda Visalandra movement chesi… gentleman's agreement ani kathalu cheppi… finally merged… in 1956…

You tell who is desperate now?

Lol tg assembly lo merger ki ok chesaru

Malli ikkada kooda AP lobbying ah lol 🤣

Jai Andhra movement telusa 

[futureofandhra]

7 hours ago, reality said:

There was no such delineation as Andhra or Telangana during the time of ancient kingdoms. It seems like, evadi hawa entha sagithe vadi kingdom boundaries antha undevi… Likeminded kingdoms alliance undevi… and so people used to share their common interests and hardships, and cooperate with each other (don’t confuse this with the modern day Samaikyandhra argument).

But extended nizam rule of Hyderabad region (current Telangana) and extended British rule of Madras state (current Andhra) brought huge cultural and development disparities between the regions. Telangana region had to endure rajakar bastards towards the end of nizam rule and got its freedom one year after India did. While the region was in the repair mode from 1948 - 1956, has its own CM etc… during which a completely different territory (like said above, culture and development disparities) called Andhra state (which itself got detached from Madras state in 1953) was proposed and lobbied to be merged with Hyderabad state in the guise of state partition on the basis of language (what a foolish measure!).

Then Telangana politicians succumbed… by trusting the various agreements and protections offered to people of Hyderabad region, Mulki rules (gentleman’s agreement etc)… Telugu state formed in 1956 and all those protections were put in trash… slowly command changed… injustice and unfairness continued by ruling CMs. 1969 TG separation fight… 610 GO failure… still injustice continued. Finally Telangana formed in 2014.

Ee tg gola enti man malli ee thread lo 

Can you post anything before that razakars regime

Just curious of that areas history and culture 

[reality]

1 minute ago, futureofandhra said:

Lol tg assembly lo merger ki ok chesaru

Malli ikkada kooda AP lobbying ah lol 🤣

Jai Andhra movement telusa 

Pilla pithre gadivi… go side and play.

[reality]

Just now, futureofandhra said:

Ee tg gola enti man malli ee thread lo 

Can you post anything before that razakars regime

Just curious of that areas history and culture 

Nuvvu thread esindhe andhuku kadha

[futureofandhra]

12 hours ago, dasari4kntr said:

 

sixteen Mahajanapadas:

1. The Buddhist Anguttara Nikaya, at several places,^[15] gives a list of sixteen great nations:

   1. Anga
   2. Assaka (or Asmaka)
   3. Avanti
   4. Chedi
   5. Gandhara
   6. Kashi
   7. Kamboja
   8. Kosala
   9. Kuru
   10. Magadha
   11. Malla
   12. Matsya (or Maccha)
   13. Panchala
   14. Surasena
   15. Vajji
   16. Vatsa (or Vamsa)

 

Aśmaka

The country of Assaka or the Ashmaka tribe was located in Dakshinapatha or southern India. It included areas in present-day Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, and Maharashtra.[21] In Gautama Buddha's time, many of the Assakas were located on the banks of the Godavari River (south of the Vindhya mountains). The capital of the Assakas was Potana or Potali, which corresponds present-day Bodhan in Telangana and Paudanya of Mahabharata.[22] In Maharashtra its capital is located in Potali which corresponds to present day Nandura, Buldhana district. The Ashmakas are also mentioned by Pāṇini. They are placed in the north-west in the Markendeya Purana and the Brhat Samhita. The river Godavari separated the country of the Assakas from that of the Mulakas (or Alakas). The country of Assaka lay outside the pale of Madhyadesa. It was located on a southern high road, the Dakshinapatha. At one time, Assaka included Mulaka and abutted Avanti.[23]

 

 

year 600 BCE

 

 

year 500 BCE

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interesting time line 

[futureofandhra]

Just now, reality said:

Nuvvu thread esindhe andhuku kadha

No not at all 

I have nothing against tg they are making progress towards development 

[futureofandhra]

3 minutes ago, reality said:

Pilla pithre gadivi… go side and play.

Sarey ley meekay Anni telusu 

Ah gola vadilesi post about the culture of that areas 

[reality]

Just now, futureofandhra said:

Sarey ley meekay Anni telusu 

Ah gola vadilesi post about the culture of that areas 

Gentleman agreement tho merged ani everyone knows… nuvvemo assembly antav… 70s ayina Jai Andhra antav… niku inka em reply istharu mari…

Culture of the areas ante clear ga cheppina kadha… there were no borders such as bhagyanagaram, Telangana, Andhra during that time…

[futureofandhra]

1 minute ago, reality said:

Gentleman agreement tho merged ani everyone knows… nuvvemo assembly antav… 70s ayina Jai Andhra antav… niku inka em reply istharu mari…

Culture of the areas ante clear ga cheppina kadha… there were no borders such as bhagyanagaram, Telangana, Andhra during that time…

see borders created by humans to differentiate areas

but every area has got its culture