Mancode Posted April 6, 2023 Report Posted April 6, 2023 all those people who met him in person...never say he is a terrorist....su swamy,sekhar gupta etc He never used Khalistan word ...and seperation from India....all he want is implementation of "anandpur sahib resolution " ,read Anand pur sahib resolution Congress made him and branded him as terrorist and killed..... Quote
AryaD Posted April 6, 2023 Report Posted April 6, 2023 32 minutes ago, Mancode said: all those people who met him in person...never say he is a terrorist....su swamy,sekhar gupta etc He never used Khalistan word ...and seperation from India....all he want is implementation of "anandpur sahib resolution " ,read Anand pur sahib resolution Congress made him and branded him as terrorist and killed..... This guy’s presentation skills are horrible man. Motions bigapattinatlu cheptahdu 1 Quote
kevinUsa Posted April 6, 2023 Report Posted April 6, 2023 big big countries small small issues aa small mistake was a bhindrawale... Quote
Android_Halwa Posted April 6, 2023 Report Posted April 6, 2023 1 hour ago, Mancode said: all those people who met him in person...never say he is a terrorist....su swamy,sekhar gupta etc He never used Khalistan word ...and seperation from India....all he want is implementation of "anandpur sahib resolution " ,read Anand pur sahib resolution Congress made him and branded him as terrorist and killed..... Until 1981-82, Bindranwale was not branded as a terrorist or separatist leader and negotiations have been happening with a political will... Akalis differed with Bindranwale on the same "Anandpursahib Resolution" and 1980 tarvata the united sikh movement kastha split ayi factions modalu ayinayi...radicalism ekuvaindi..GoI did everything it can to promote the Akalis and this angered Bindranwale faction and resorted to political murders and this is where things started to go wrong...Akalis in an attempt to come back to power, supported by GoI, negotiations for Bindranwale to surrender or lay down arms...infact there are some contradictory notes that Indira Gandhi personally met Jarnail Singh for political resolutions...but subsequently flight hijack, political murders, news paper editirs murder tarvata a crusader eventually became a terrorist.. I read somewhere that Gandhi ordered Operation Bluestar in a fit of rage after Bindranwale refused to lay down arms and vacate Harmandir Saheb complex. Gandhi tried peace negotiation's for a political resolution until a day before bluestar started. Quote
Android_Halwa Posted April 6, 2023 Report Posted April 6, 2023 1 hour ago, Mancode said: Not just Congress, even Akalis had their fair share in Bidnrawale's mess. They feared his popularity will dent in Akalis coming to power ever again.. Quote
Mancode Posted April 7, 2023 Author Report Posted April 7, 2023 6 hours ago, Android_Halwa said: Until 1981-82, Bindranwale was not branded as a terrorist or separatist leader and negotiations have been happening with a political will... Akalis differed with Bindranwale on the same "Anandpursahib Resolution" and 1980 tarvata the united sikh movement kastha split ayi factions modalu ayinayi...radicalism ekuvaindi..GoI did everything it can to promote the Akalis and this angered Bindranwale faction and resorted to political murders and this is where things started to go wrong...Akalis in an attempt to come back to power, supported by GoI, negotiations for Bindranwale to surrender or lay down arms...infact there are some contradictory notes that Indira Gandhi personally met Jarnail Singh for political resolutions...but subsequently flight hijack, political murders, news paper editirs murder tarvata a crusader eventually became a terrorist.. I read somewhere that Gandhi ordered Operation Bluestar in a fit of rage after Bindranwale refused to lay down arms and vacate Harmandir Saheb complex. Gandhi tried peace negotiation's for a political resolution until a day before bluestar started. State within a state .... KGB files....chadivithe we can know more...... This guy is feared by KGB and UK ,for promoting religion ..they anyway want to destroy him...through murder...but didn't happen , harikishan surjeet then CPI leader who was actual kingmaker later in centre...w.as the brain behind this man dead........ Indira gandhi was so influenced by Russia and spread fake news on him in mainstream media.....there is no alternative media then....... Printing of currency notes , golden temple being headquarters of terrorism blah blah ... Quote
Mancode Posted April 7, 2023 Author Report Posted April 7, 2023 8 hours ago, AryaD said: This guy’s presentation skills are horrible man. Motions bigapattinatlu cheptahdu True Quote
Mancode Posted April 7, 2023 Author Report Posted April 7, 2023 6 hours ago, Android_Halwa said: Until 1981-82, Bindranwale was not branded as a terrorist or separatist leader and negotiations have been happening with a political will... Akalis differed with Bindranwale on the same "Anandpursahib Resolution" and 1980 tarvata the united sikh movement kastha split ayi factions modalu ayinayi...radicalism ekuvaindi..GoI did everything it can to promote the Akalis and this angered Bindranwale faction and resorted to political murders and this is where things started to go wrong...Akalis in an attempt to come back to power, supported by GoI, negotiations for Bindranwale to surrender or lay down arms...infact there are some contradictory notes that Indira Gandhi personally met Jarnail Singh for political resolutions...but subsequently flight hijack, political murders, news paper editirs murder tarvata a crusader eventually became a terrorist.. I read somewhere that Gandhi ordered Operation Bluestar in a fit of rage after Bindranwale refused to lay down arms and vacate Harmandir Saheb complex. Gandhi tried peace negotiation's for a political resolution until a day before bluestar started. The hate for religion lies in nehru Dynasty itself ,so they did their part...... Have you heard of firing on vhp activists by Indira Gandhi govt in Delhi for their simple protest of banning cow slaughter..... Quote
Thokkalee Posted April 7, 2023 Report Posted April 7, 2023 Sikhs wanted an autonomous state (by some) or a separate country (by others) as Pakistan was supporting the Sikhs by supplying them with money and weapons. This was as a ** for tat for the Bangladesh war, that they badly lost. They wanted to break out Punjab from India. Why will India agree to this, especially for a state on Pakistan border?? These journalists are star struck after their frequent meetings with Bhindranwale, who was a charming personality.. there were too many groups of armed Sikhs and he had no control over who does what… Quote
Mancode Posted April 7, 2023 Author Report Posted April 7, 2023 28 minutes ago, Thokkalee said: Sikhs wanted an autonomous state (by some) or a separate country (by others) as Pakistan was supporting the Sikhs by supplying them with money and weapons. This was as a ** for tat for the Bangladesh war, that they badly lost. They wanted to break out Punjab from India. Why will India agree to this, especially for a state on Pakistan border?? These journalists are star struck after their frequent meetings with Bhindranwale, who was a charming personality.. there were too many groups of armed Sikhs and he had no control over who does what… sikhs means not only this guy jagjeet singh chauhan ani ISI sponsored terrorist okadu undevadu ,vadu chesina penta adhanta ,like now amritpal singh Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.