Re-org in your company

[Sucker]

16 minutes ago, appaji_pesarattu said:

em Biz anna?... consulting ee kada...

PM chey Anna. Not here plz

[r2d2]

40 minutes ago, Anta Assamey said:

Re-Org ante enti....

[reality]

9 hours ago, Konebhar6 said:

Good point of view. I can also add that it makes for new managers to take decisions against non performing emps or emps in insignificant roles. 

Non-performing employees meedha anyone can take action, even the current manager. Manager can’t shield such employees for long risking his own portfolio.

[reality]

6 hours ago, r2d2 said:

exactly, but companies doing reorg have this benefit though…

10 hours ago, reality said:

They do it to break existing rapport between manager and employee so that employee finds a new manager all of a sudden, which in turn delays promotion/hikes.

 

[reality]

8 hours ago, Vaaampire said:

maa company lo last 1yr lo 3 re-orgs. I was positively impacted first time and negative for the other 2. Theu could have done just one major re-org instead but could have been very hectic.

adhe magiccu… even in your case, you were negatively impacted more times than positive. Its all thought-through evil process.

[Konebhar6]

3 minutes ago, reality said:

Non-performing employees meedha anyone can take action, even the current manager. Manager can’t shield such employees for long risking his own portfolio.

Managers typically tries to protect their teams. They may not take action until there is pressure on them. In these situations, the old manager may still give recommendation but its easy for new manager to talk to team saying its not in his/her control.

[Galactus]

few months ayindi cheri, re-orgs parampara started recently, fichal pack aithunnayi

 nenu join aina work kakunda veredhi cheyamantunnaru , some leadership also left, endo ee karma, shift avudam ante market mari darunam ha undi

[reality]

3 minutes ago, Konebhar6 said:

Managers typically tries to protect their teams. They may not take action until there is pressure on them. In these situations, the old manager may still give recommendation but its easy for new manager to talk to team saying its not in his/her control.

You can’t just ‘protect’, without showing KPIs/growth/delivery to leadership. Its hard for a manager to reach his own goals, keeping underperforming employees in the team. In this context, definition of under performing employees is, the ones who are supposed to be fired.

[Konebhar6]

19 minutes ago, reality said:

You can’t just ‘protect’, without showing KPIs/growth/delivery to leadership. Its hard for a manager to reach his own goals, keeping underperforming employees in the team. In this context, definition of under performing employees is, the ones who are supposed to be fired.

Sometimes, managers try to keep these emps .. for when difficult times strike to get rid. Also sometimes, a headcount lost, they may not get back, so keep them. Lots of factors. 

I also considered under performing emps as the ones to be fired. 

[Sharmila_4_Prabhas]

re-org ante company 3 months lo  lepedaniki chustundhi

[Dallas_balu]

14 minutes ago, Sharmila_4_Prabhas said:

re-org ante company 3 months lo  lepedaniki chustundhi

Ninnu lepeshindra anna

[Sharmila_4_Prabhas]

Just now, Dallas_balu said:

Ninnu lepeshindra anna

neenu director anna nanu lepaleru 

[r2d2]

1 minute ago, Sharmila_4_Prabhas said:

neenu director anna

heroine evaru ?

[Dallas_balu]

1 minute ago, r2d2 said:

heroine evaru ?

Sharmila