Difference in behavior between leaders of Seema, Telangana, Krishna-Guntur, and Godavari/Uttarandhra

[venkappa]

Most rajakeeya nayakulu over here are corrupt fellows since 1947. Kanni cultural differences depending on region may influence some leaders to act in certain ways.

• Some leaders create matham/kulam pichi or godava with voters IF there is scope int their region.
• Some leaders use more violence for intimidation when there was violent history in their region.
• Some leaders promise freebies or development because voter power or expectations too strong.
• Some leaders depend on party or leader sentiment because of past sympathy.

Generally speaking, leaders from which region were better or worse in governing/developing their constituency from your experience? 

[Android_Halwa]

In a broader sense, India is developing on its own pace and its on auto pilot mode. Politicians are like catalyst and reverse catalyst but they do not have enough power to stop development. 

[venkappa]

23 minutes ago, Android_Halwa said:

In a broader sense, India is developing on its own pace and its on auto pilot mode. Politicians are like catalyst and reverse catalyst but they do not have enough power to stop development. 

But have you noticed any difference in how leaders from different jillas or Telugu prantham conduct themselves? 

[Tryad]

neeku telisi stereotypes antha vaadi, nuvvey edho okati settle aypo.

nuvvedhi anukunna adhi tappey avtundhi.

as much as an individual is a product of his culture, most highly successful politiciansare detached from their culture. All leaders from everywhere are the same, it just depends on who weilds power and what the current political economy is.

some like Modi are plain disgusting and evil, but its not an indictment of Gujarat where he comes from. Its his own lack of character.

[Konebhar6]

3 hours ago, venkappa said:

Most rajakeeya nayakulu over here are corrupt fellows since 1947. Kanni cultural differences depending on region may influence some leaders to act in certain ways.

• Some leaders create matham/kulam pichi or godava with voters IF there is scope int their region.
• Some leaders use more violence for intimidation when there was violent history in their region.
• Some leaders promise freebies or development because voter power or expectations too strong.
• Some leaders depend on party or leader sentiment because of past sympathy.

Generally speaking, leaders from which region were better or worse in governing/developing their constituency from your experience? 

• No matter the modus-operandi, final goal is Divide and rule.
• All politicians have common goal to make money. Only difference is how much money.

[venkappa]

13 minutes ago, Konebhar6 said:

• No matter the modus-operandi, final goal is Divide and rule.
• All politicians have common goal to make money. Only difference is how much money.

Who made more money?

[Konebhar6]

15 minutes ago, venkappa said:

Who made more money?

There are different levels of greed. Some are greedy but still does a lot of what they are supposed to do. on the other extreme, they can go any extent to make money.

Unfortunately there are less "Less Greedy" politicians.

[hotlantian]

Since 1947 is wrong. MLAs used to be very good and not corrupted. Our constituency mlas back in 1980’s literally did not make any money and died miserably. After his mla term, he used to beg money from people for his daily quarter. It only started from 1990’s 

[The_Captain]

3 minutes ago, hotlantian said:

Since 1947 is wrong. MLAs used to be very good and not corrupted. Our constituency mlas back in 1980’s literally did not make any money and died miserably. After his mla term, he used to beg money from people for his daily quarter. It only started from 1990’s 

alaanti situation osthadhi ane papam mana maha meetha and his akrama pilla pscho gallu just daily needs kosram laksha kotlu “sampadincharu” 

pumpuhar why-yes-r,  amar rahe jagade-ke-baal 

[manadonga]

1 hour ago, hotlantian said:

Since 1947 is wrong. MLAs used to be very good and not corrupted. Our constituency mlas back in 1980’s literally did not make any money and died miserably. After his mla term, he used to beg money from people for his daily quarter. It only started from 1990’s 

Corruption is there from 1950s from mlas but Indian gdp is very less at that time