Bharat gillidhanda league

[JackSeal]

2 minutes ago, rushmore said:

There's no proof that what had been written & what is being circulated as "The Manu" is  original. The year & the century it was written are also heavily disputed. Some say it was written some 800 years ago, some say 1000 years ago. These texts are not similar to Bible or Quran with respect to authenticity. The fact that people don't regard as anything close to vedas or even Purans, Ithihasas which have had so many disputes with many different versions should tell you something.

Ramayanam lo kuda various versions unnai with contradicting info so adhi kuda authentic kadhu antava ?

[Konebhar6]

2 hours ago, JackSeal said:

Stop promoting british cricket

We adopted no? 

We are a mix of all cultures, Muslim rulers, British/French/Portugese/etc, and lots of diff Indian races. This is the reason why we love BIRYANI a lot and why its an Emotion for us.

[Guest]

12 minutes ago, JackSeal said:

Ramayanam lo kuda various versions unnai with contradicting info so adhi kuda authentic kadhu antava ?

Yes That's correct. 

[argadorn]

Pedda nayana e rojuki idiseyii

[Spartan]

58 minutes ago, JackSeal said:

Manu smriti written in 1250 BCE. Xtianity born in 1st century CE and islam 7th century CE. India lo those two religions conquest chesaka rayadam enti ?

BCE and CE anna diff undi 1200 yrs

[Bendapudi_english]

15 minutes ago, Spartan said:

BCE and CE anna diff undi 1200 yrs

@Spartan anna edchetolu edusthune untar especially ee daddy daddy batch, as a bjp supporter ni opinion enti Bharath name change midha 

[Spartan]

19 minutes ago, Bendapudi_english said:

@Spartan anna edchetolu edusthune untar especially ee daddy daddy batch, as a bjp supporter ni opinion enti Bharath name change midha 

Waste of time. Day-Day life change emi undadu evadiki..

They should have put more effort on UCC rather than this silly stuff..

UCC kosam janalani educate cheyadam lo pettalsindi ....where other parties are giving it a religion color.

which it is not.

[Bendapudi_english]

4 minutes ago, Spartan said:

Waste of time. Day-Day life change emi undadu evadiki..

They should have put more effort on UCC rather than this silly stuff..

UCC kosam janalani educate cheyadam lo pettalsindi ....where other parties are giving it a religion color.

which it is not.

Thanks Anna, I think max India ane pilustharu, UCC will be a game changer Modi and BJP ki 

[CanadianMalodu]

11 hours ago, rushmore said:

Do tell us who they are. @Telugodura456 @Tryad will also joing the discussion

With @CanadianMalodu 

Aryans as a separate race , if existed are inseparable at this point of time. Tarimikottali anedhi correct kadhu. Supposedly if they had existed then there is a lot of intermixing with locals for a long time. Central Asian traits are visible among the Indians of western part, slender noes, wheatish complexion, lean build, chiseled jaw line. But these features are also present in Indians in the southern states but not to the same extent. Mangalore region in Karnataka, and coastal region of Kerala has people of such features in greater number generally speaking. But it's also equally true that Indians in North are again built slightly different than Indian in the west or sindh regions Sure, the genetic variation is there but not enough to make it a race.

 

Even if you take celebrities say for. E.g, Aishwarya Rai , a Bunt/Shetty  from Mangalore region has more of such features say than Priyanka Chopra, a Khatri from Punjab. Hrithik Roshan is another example of what typical central Asian European genes would look like.Then again Roshan Meka son of actor Srikanth Meka has the same sort of looks but he's  of Andhra/Karnataka origin. Jayapradha  stands as another such example, she was perfect epitome of northern Indian beauty standard, but she was from Andhra. Divya Bharati was another case where her fair and slender features caught national attention but she was an SC from Punjab.  

[sri_sri999]

8 hours ago, JackSeal said:

Stop promoting british cricket

Arai erri pu.. Burma nundi Myanmar and Holland to Netherlands ela mareendoo alane India to Bharath ani marutundi daniki neevvu kukka vulli evvaram chestaventii 

[ZoomNaidu]

1 hour ago, sri_sri999 said:

Arai erri pu.. Burma nundi Myanmar and Holland to Netherlands ela mareendoo alane India to Bharath ani marutundi daniki neevvu kukka vulli evvaram chestaventii 

Vaadi yedupu India ki Indira ani peru pettaledhu anemo… 

[JackSeal]

3 hours ago, sri_sri999 said:

Arai erri pu.. Burma nundi Myanmar and Holland to Netherlands ela mareendoo alane India to Bharath ani marutundi daniki neevvu kukka vulli evvaram chestaventii 

Arei pichi puu ... India that is Bharat ani constitution article 1 lone clear ga mention chesaru. Malli marvadam entra erri ga.

Prime minister or president hindi oath taking appudu bharat ke samvidhan ane chestaru ra yerri nayala. 

ne mohanki oka passport edusthe cover page medha bharat ani vuntundhi... chudaledha kallu emina kakulu 10ngaya.

[JackSeal]

11 hours ago, Spartan said:

BCE and CE anna diff undi 1200 yrs

Thats what I said. That guy said manu smriti was written after xtian islam invasion. Manu smiriti was written in 1200BCE, that means 1200yrs before birth of xtianity.

[JackSeal]

12 hours ago, rushmore said:

Yes That's correct. 

So nv ramudi uniki ne prashnisthunnava ?

[Guest]

5 minutes ago, JackSeal said:

Thats what I said. That guy said manu smriti was written after xtian islam invasion. Manu smiriti was written in 1200BCE, that means 1200yrs before birth of xtianity.

Later scholars shifted the chronology of the text to between the first or second century CE. Olivelle adds that numismatic evidence and the mention of gold coins as a fine suggest the text may date to the 2nd or 3rd century CE.