Tryad Posted September 19, 2023 Report Posted September 19, 2023 11 minutes ago, dasari4kntr said: i dont have time for some random person who judge me like i drive 130 miles...so i shouldnt talk about climate change..(while they still using mobile wihich is charged by fossile fuel..at least i am not hypocrite ...like preaching ethics to others or judging others ethics..) you still don't understand how ethics works. you are just lashing out like a dumbfcuk who's hurt. atleast you had the decency to quote me this time.. so that's an improvement. Quote
dasari4kntr Posted September 19, 2023 Author Report Posted September 19, 2023 17 minutes ago, shaktimaan said: but in general, philosophy ane concept should be kept to themselves and not preached. Every human is unique and influencing/manipulating through philosophy should not be encouraged if it is not preached..how would any one know... pantheism.. problem of evil... platos allegory of the cave... determinism... Is-Ought problem.. utilitarianism... Locke's primary & secondary qualities.. cosmological arguments.. Berkley's arguemnt.. Telelogical Arguments.. Kantian ethics.. Virtu ethics Emotivism.. Plato forms.. Natural law... Ontological arguments.. nihilism.. skepticism.. absurdism.. ..etc each word can be worth of google search or chat gpt search... Quote
dasari4kntr Posted September 19, 2023 Author Report Posted September 19, 2023 1 minute ago, Tryad said: you still don't understand how ethics works. you are just lashing out like a dumbfcuk who's hurt. atleast you had the decency to quote me this time.. so that's an improvement. fcuk off... i wont do that mistake again... Quote
Tryad Posted September 19, 2023 Report Posted September 19, 2023 1 minute ago, dasari4kntr said: if it is not preached..how would any one know... pantheism.. problem of evil... platos allegory of the cave... determinism... Is-Ought problem.. utilitarianism... Locke's primary & secondary qualities.. cosmological arguments.. Berkley's arguemnt.. Telelogical Arguments.. Kantian ethics.. Virtu ethics Emotivism.. Plato forms.. Natural law... Ontological arguments.. nihilism.. skepticism.. absurdism.. ..etc each word can be worth of google search or chat gpt search... ivanni nijanganey nuvvu chadivaava? how come you are so poor at argumentation then? Quote
Tryad Posted September 19, 2023 Report Posted September 19, 2023 Just now, dasari4kntr said: fcuk off... i wont do that mistake again... yeah I know. you are an unethical piece of sh1t asshole pretending to be wise old man. you are not fooling me. Quote
Tryad Posted September 19, 2023 Report Posted September 19, 2023 ekkuva kasta padakunda, start with what I suggested.. otherwise you'll never be able to debate with anyone with an IQ over 90. Quote
Tryad Posted September 19, 2023 Report Posted September 19, 2023 I'm looking RGVs children. I'm laughing at them. he created a generation of dumbfcuks in telugu states. Thankfully some kids escaped his pernicious influence and are fine. Quote
dasari4kntr Posted September 19, 2023 Author Report Posted September 19, 2023 arguemnt is for loosers..who just keep barking in this db..to push their political narrative and judgements... i am fine if some one call me what ever.. i would like to spend my time...some where useful for myself... again...i say things in this db...i dont push on others and argue.. i just say my opinions and leave... Quote
Tryad Posted September 19, 2023 Report Posted September 19, 2023 4 minutes ago, dasari4kntr said: arguemnt is for loosers..who just keep barking in this db..to push their political narrative and judgements... i am fine if some one call me what ever.. i would like to spend my time...some where useful for myself... again...i say things in this db...i dont push on others and argue.. i just say my opinions and leave... you are an idiot. argument is for losers anta. you are declaring that you are not willing to change your mind unless I'm down to sucking your d1ck. that's the level of arrogance you show here. and you want respect for that kind of arrogance. dream on cutie. Quote
dasari4kntr Posted September 19, 2023 Author Report Posted September 19, 2023 right or wrong is perspective …ee fact teliyani judgmental a holes vunnatha varaku arugument is for loosers… Quote
Tryad Posted September 19, 2023 Report Posted September 19, 2023 dumbfcuk @dasari4kntr gets on a db with full of abusive assholes going at each other all day, and seeks to attain knowledge by propagating some nonsense text he half read online, and won't entertain negative comments on it.. how does this work exactly? like idiot, have you actually read everything that you claim that you read? or are you just flexing based on glancing of chatgpt summaries of them? this is why I said, pick up a logic 101 text. Quote
Tryad Posted September 19, 2023 Report Posted September 19, 2023 11 minutes ago, dasari4kntr said: right or wrong is perspective …ee fact teliyani judgmental a holes vunnatha varaku arugument is for loosers… right or wrong is a perspective only outside of ethical systems that you construct for yourselves. like for example, if you think killing an animal for food is right.. then r@ping an animal for pleasure should also be right. because both of them involve harming of animals you don't care about. you can't say within the ethical system that you chose for yourself (harming animals is okay) that r@ping animals is right/wrong as a perspective.. or even eating dogs, cats, etc is wrong. It is objectively not wrong under your ethics. Its perfectly okay to r@pe animals in your world. It may be harsh for you, but it is true. there's no perspective here. that's why I said you don't understand ethics. You shouldn't be reading bs philosophies before brushing up your grasp in basic logic. you have no ethical system. malli pose okati. Quote
Jindal Posted September 19, 2023 Report Posted September 19, 2023 4 minutes ago, Tryad said: right or wrong is a perspective only outside of ethical systems that you construct for yourselves. like for example, if you think killing an animal for food is right.. then r@ping an animal for pleasure should also be right. because both of them involve harming of animals you don't care about. you can't say within the ethical system that you chose for yourself (harming animals is okay) that r@ping animals is right/wrong as a perspective.. or even eating dogs, cats, etc is wrong. It is objectively wrong under your ethics. that's why I said you don't understand ethics. You shouldn't be reading bs philosophies before brushing up your grasp in basic logic. you have no ethical system. malli pose okati. simple thought i think killing animals for food comes from nature anedi my opinion. human evolution lo jarigina process. tarvata steps gurinchi debate chestu basics marchipotunama? 1 Quote
dasari4kntr Posted September 19, 2023 Author Report Posted September 19, 2023 i read most of the topics…i discussed the same in many of my threads…specially in. “philosophy thread “… this is what i call judgemental behavior…i dont know when you will learn…or you will never learn a hole.. all you believe is suddenly you wome up as vegan and judge everyone weong…another fine day you woke up as woke artist and judge everyone wrong..(in fact your doing more harm to the transgender real cause)…another fine day your woke up as climate activist and you judge everyone is w ing while using your mobile… i never saw a hypocrite like you… if you are true what your saying in this db …you shouldn’t be in this db first place…you should be on road for your cause… thu…fake artist..and fake leftist… Quote
Tryad Posted September 19, 2023 Report Posted September 19, 2023 saying right/wrong is a perspective is a lazy way to escape consequences of your choice. feel free to explain how A can be right, but B which follows the same logic of A is wrong? or is a perspective. Quote
.thumb.jpg.ce42bb16ec102475a78c2087ce269c7d.jpg)
.thumb.gif.343fe49c7e1c507ae0056326bd8cf77e.gif)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.