Jump to content

'Hindus Leave Canada Or...': Khalistan Terrorist Pannun's Open Threat; Will Trudeau Arrest Him?


Recommended Posts

Posted
10 minutes ago, kevinUsa said:

Em undi bro em ledu Edo 4 days lolli

4 days taravatha usual ga Milton become Multan post lu esko bro.

manam chesthe samsaram.. etc..

Posted
8 minutes ago, Telugodura456 said:

Pannun is there and giving threats. And no action from india. "calculated risk" etc is lot of words to justify no action here.

USA and canada have similiar sikh population and demographics are roughly the same.

 

No action will be taken against him by Trudeau's government.

The sikh population in Canada has a different origin that lies in the annals of the British colonial history unlike those that migrated to US. Also the population of Sikhs is disproportionately higher in Canada compared to the US. Further, they already carried out a terrorist attack by blasting an Air India planes loaded with almost Indo Canadians in 1985. The Canadian government's response then was 'meh', and don't expect a different response now 

Posted
Just now, CanadianMalodu said:

No action will be taken against him by Trudeau's government.

The sikh population in Canada has a different origin that lies in the annals of the British colonial history unlike those that migrated to US. Also the population of Sikhs is disproportionately higher in Canada compared to the US. Further, they already carried out a terrorist attack by blasting an Air India planes loaded with almost Indo Canadians in 1985. The Canadian government's response then was 'meh', and don't expect a different response now 

It is same origin. USA also mostly farmers moved in. what you are doing is sophistry and not analysis. Aina even different origins aithe ? they cannot sympathize or empthize with each other ?

  • Upvote 1
Posted
1 minute ago, CanadianMalodu said:

No action will be taken against him by Trudeau's government.

The sikh population in Canada has a different origin that lies in the annals of the British colonial history unlike those that migrated to US. Also the population of Sikhs is disproportionately higher in Canada compared to the US. Further, they already carried out a terrorist attack by blasting an Air India planes loaded with almost Indo Canadians in 1985. The Canadian government's response then was 'meh', and don't expect a different response now 

Pannun is in usa. I am asking where is india action against usa - since you said Modi is "serious" about national security issue.

  • Haha 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Telugodura456 said:

It is same origin. USA also mostly farmers moved in. what you are doing is sophistry and not analysis. Aina even different origins aithe ? they cannot sympathize or empthize with each other ?

No sophisticatation. Plain truth. Sikhs were part of British armed forces for a long time. They settled in Canada way before, and started to pull in their kin and kith. The idea of Khalistan statehood dates back to aftermath of second Anglo-Sikh war which disintegrated the sikh empire and the idea took a political turn in 1930, and 40s when British divided India on religious lines.  Those with the idea of separate statehood moved Canada, Post Indian partition but the inherent idea was always there in some of these stock Sikhs. The same thing happened during Khalistan movement and post Indira Gandhi's assassination. It's was this time when the most extreme version of Khalistani ideology was exported to Canada. They sympathize with each other, that's obvious. But Sikhs are traditionally not the demography that generated a lot of political weight in US unlike in Canada where their numbers are enough to pull strings in politics. Also, Sikhs were victims of the hate crimes post 9/11 which probably mellowed them along with the omnipresent pressure of assimilation 'melting pot' . The result is you get to see the likes of Nikki Haley, unlike the Mosaic nature of sticking to your own culture of Anglo Canada. Ultimately, their Canadian counterparts are political heavy weights and are capable of pooling money and execute actions.

Posted
2 minutes ago, CanadianMalodu said:

No sophisticatation. Plain truth. Sikhs were part of British armed forces for a long time. They settled in Canada way before, and started to pull in their kin and kith. The idea of Khalistan statehood dates back to aftermath of second Anglo-Sikh war which disintegrated the sikh empire and the idea took a political turn in 1930, and 40s when British divided India on religious lines.  Those with the idea of separate statehood moved Canada, Post Indian partition but the inherent idea was always there in some of these stock Sikhs. The same thing happened during Khalistan movement and post Indira Gandhi's assassination. It's was this time when the most extreme version of Khalistani ideology was exported to Canada. They sympathize with each other, that's obvious. But Sikhs are traditionally not the demography that generated a lot of political weight in US unlike in Canada where their numbers are enough to pull strings in politics. Also, Sikhs were victims of the hate crimes post 9/11 which probably mellowed them along with the omnipresent pressure of assimilation 'melting pot' . The result is you get to see the likes of Nikki Haley, unlike the Mosaic nature of sticking to your own culture of Anglo Canada. Ultimately, their Canadian counterparts are political heavy weights and are capable of pooling money and execute actions.

fine. your description of khalistani origins in Canada are more or less true. but the question remains.

why did Indian govt revive the khalistani movement that was in its final embers even in Canada until GoI played up the khalistani angle to snuff the anti farm law agitation.

now khalistanis are coming out of the wood works to make a$$es of themselves in public over a demand that can never materialize.

the answer is simple. Its not Canada that is playing vote bank politics with khalistanis.. It is India. And it will be the Hindus living in Canada that'll bear the brunt of this misadventure.

 

Posted
25 minutes ago, Telugodura456 said:

Pannun is in usa. I am asking where is india action against usa - since you said Modi is "serious" about national security issue.

Blimey, I thought he was in Canada. May be they will. If the threat perception is high, there probably  will be another threat neutralization. We will never know in advance. He will certainly not be allowed to come to India or probably be detained if tries to come in. There may some correspondence initiated in diplomatic cables, and why shall that be public always?

 

Posted
4 minutes ago, CanadianMalodu said:

Blimey, I thought he was in Canada. May be they will. If the threat perception is high, there probably  will be another threat neutralization. We will never know in advance. He will certainly not be allowed to come to India or probably be detained if tries to come in. There may some correspondence initiated in diplomatic cables, and why shall that be public always?

 

all this hoopla, for a movement that literally has no support among majority canadian sikhs until GoI raked it up last year.

good job Modi turning more gorrey Hindus into votebanks.

Posted
13 minutes ago, CanadianMalodu said:

threat perception is high, there probably  will be another threat neutralization.

reminds of a scene while I was in middle school.

when the princi wandered out of her room, a restless dad accosted her and demanded that she see him next coz he has important stuff from work that he needs to attend.

and she asked him what it is that you do. and guess what he said

RAW officer. The princi laughed hard on that.. and asked him to wait for his turn and left. :giggle:

Posted
4 hours ago, kevinUsa said:

Endi ra edi Indian media asale Canada ante pillanu ivvadam ledu ante ee news vinte Inka no girls 

Asale India lo pilla parents psycho na M **** gallu endi ee racha

Neeku and @trent anna ki kasta kalam ... we are with @kevinUsa protest start chestamu dallas lo next week 😂

Posted
2 minutes ago, ForEverJava said:

Neeku and @trent anna ki kasta kalam ... we are with @kevinUsa protest start chestamu dallas lo next week 😂

Ala antav endi 

Posted
53 minutes ago, CanadianMalodu said:

No action will be taken against him by Trudeau's government.

The sikh population in Canada has a different origin that lies in the annals of the British colonial history unlike those that migrated to US. Also the population of Sikhs is disproportionately higher in Canada compared to the US. Further, they already carried out a terrorist attack by blasting an Air India planes loaded with almost Indo Canadians in 1985. The Canadian government's response then was 'meh', and don't expect a different response now 

Ironically then PM was Senior Trudeau.

Posted
1 hour ago, Tryad said:

roju verey ethnicities religions meedha chethha post lu vesey ee db lo vaalley cheppaali neethulu migatha vaallaki.

:giggle:

mooskondi ra inka..

let them know uncle

let them face the heat

  • Haha 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...