Jump to content

Canada allowed Hardeep Singh Nijjar citizenship when India demanded his arrest


Recommended Posts

Posted

The long-pending citizenship application of Hardeep Singh Nijjar was okayed by Canada within months after a Red-Corner Notice (RCN) was issued against him.

 

Acting on an RCN, which is issued through Interpol, a country has to arrest the accused and deport him or her. However, Canada did the exact opposite, said an official.

 

Red-corner notice issued 9 years ago

 

1st Red-Corner Notice against Nijjar in 2014, second in 2016

Got citizenship in 2015, said a Canadian minister on Tuesday

On Wednesday, he said Nijjar got it in 2007, a claim doubted by Indian agencies

During talks with Canada, the Indian Government had mentioned how the citizenship application of Nijjar was approved by Canada months after the first RCN was issued on November 14, 2014.

 

The first RCN was issued after a case (FIR No. 159) was registered against Nijjar at the Kotwali police station, Patiala, by the Punjab Police. The second RCN was issued in FIR No. 19 lodged at the Nurpur police station, Ropar, in 2016.

 

In a post on ‘X’ on Tuesday night, Canada’s Immigration Minister Marc Miller said: “I can confirm that Nijjar became a Canadian citizen on March 3, 2015. I hope this dispels the baseless rumours that he was not a Canadian.” On Wednesday, however, Miller posted, “Nijjar became a Canadian citizen on May 25, 2007, earlier than I stated. The error in dates is my responsibility to assume.” Indian agencies have doubted Miller’s latest claim. The issue of citizenship had already been flagged to Canada and also to the Interpol.

 

The Indian side had also asked Ottawa how Nijjar kept on living in Canada from 1997 to 2015. Nijjar arrived at Toronto aboard a flight on February 10, 1997, using a fraudulent passport issued in the name of ‘Ravi Sharma’. Nijjar had shorn his hair after a raid in 1996 at his uncle’s house in UP where he was hiding after the Punjab Police had detained him in 1995.

 

Nijjar gave an affidavit, along with a medical record of alleged torture in India, in June 1998 to Canada seeking refuge. His plea was rejected by the Canadian authorities.

 

On November 21, 1998, less than two weeks after Nijjar’s claim was rejected, he married a woman who sponsored him. Immigration officials noted his wife had arrived in Canada in 1997, “sponsored by a different husband”.

  • Haha 1
Posted

Eppudu final conclusion amiti brother ? Champadam lo.desama hand undha ? 

Tinaki Canadian  citizenship iyaledhu Ani undi , but how he MLmanaged to travel to UN Geneva & USA ? 

 

 

Posted
6 minutes ago, pizzaaddict said:

Eppudu final conclusion amiti brother ? Champadam lo.desama hand undha ? 

Tinaki Canadian  citizenship iyaledhu Ani undi , but how he MLmanaged to travel to UN Geneva & USA ? 

 

 

Identity theft perhaps. 

Posted
6 minutes ago, pizzaaddict said:

Eppudu final conclusion amiti brother ? Champadam lo.desama hand undha ? 

Tinaki Canadian  citizenship iyaledhu Ani undi , but how he MLmanaged to travel to UN Geneva & USA ? 

 

 

Simple bro velli baga lolli pettaru so govt ki kalindi champinchindi with help of Chinese Desi and Jamaican gangs 

Jt  and Melanie Joly wanted to keep quiet, but modi and jaishanker put big modda in jt mouth on his recent India trip so he spoke about it I. Parliament with provocation of this LGBT   called jagmit Singh said India did it...

So he is just face of the issue and little outspoken just to prove that India has steel balls they have taken out..not only this guy but also few heads in Australia and UK too.....

 

 

 

  • Upvote 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, kevinUsa said:

Simple bro velli baga lolli pettaru so govt ki kalindi champinchindi with help of Chinese Desi and Jamaican gangs 

Jt  and Melanie Joly wanted to keep quiet, but modi and jaishanker put big modda in jt mouth on his recent India trip so he spoke about it I. Parliament with provocation of this LGBT   called jagmit Singh said India did it...

So he is just face of the issue and little outspoken just to prove that India has steel balls they have taken out..not only this guy but also few heads in Australia and UK too.....

 

 

 

NATO perspective lo kooda provoke chestunaru ga 

https://www.vox.com/world-politics/2023/9/20/23880514/canada-india-sikh-killing-trudeau-hardeep-singh-nijjar

But the killing of a NATO country’s citizen inside their borders would represent a massive and worrying escalation. In the 21st century, fellow democracies almost never assassinate each other's citizens on each other’s territory, even if they are suspected of serious crimes. “Transnational repression,” the political science term for going after dissidents and critics abroad, is typically practiced by the world’s most brutal regimes — places like China, Russia, Iran, and Saudi Arabia.

“Most of us still believe that we’re the good guys and our government doesn’t do this kind of thing,” the Indian economist Mihir Sharma writes in Bloomberg. “If India actually did conduct an assassination on Western soil — which its foreign ministry strongly denies — it would represent a pretty major escalation of the country’s covert struggle against both non-violent dissidents and active supporters of militant separatism abroad.”

India has been moving in a distinctly autocratic direction for some years. Prime Minister Narendra Modi, in power since 2014, has led an escalating war against India’s democratic institutions — attacking press freedoms, weaponizing security services against his political opponents, and demonizing the Muslim minority. Viewed in this light, killing a Sikh dissident abroad would be yet another sign that the world’s largest country is traveling down a dangerous road.

 

Posted
18 minutes ago, CanadianMalodu said:

Identity theft perhaps. 

Canada immigration , it's confidential Ani dramas adutuanru regarding his citizenship 

Posted
7 minutes ago, pizzaaddict said:

Canada immigration , it's confidential Ani dramas adutuanru regarding his citizenship 

Avi routine ee. Using intelligence assets on foreign soil, is basically to deny official responsibility. CIA, Mossad, RAW, ISI all dot he same job. If the ground asset is not captured, there won't be trial. Heck, Jamal Kashoggi was a US citizen assassinated in Turkey. What happened? Nothing. All this  are pressure tactics to scare the leadership into submission. Ain't happening with Modi though.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, CanadianMalodu said:

Avi routine ee. Using intelligence assets on foreign soil, is basically to deny official responsibility. CIA, Mossad, RAW, ISI all dot he same job. If the ground asset is not captured, there won't be trial. Heck, Jamal Kashoggi was a US citizen assassinated in Turkey. What happened? Nothing. All this  are pressure tactics to scare the leadership into submission. Ain't happening with Modi though.

I thought he was Saudi citizen . All this drama is considering the sikhs support to current ruling government and they want to show that they offer support to them . Like imran did drama for article 370 and  drama is to appease their voters

Posted
50 minutes ago, kevinUsa said:

Simple bro velli baga lolli pettaru so govt ki kalindi champinchindi with help of Chinese Desi and Jamaican gangs 

Jt  and Melanie Joly wanted to keep quiet, but modi and jaishanker put big modda in jt mouth on his recent India trip so he spoke about it I. Parliament with provocation of this LGBT   called jagmit Singh said India did it...

So he is just face of the issue and little outspoken just to prove that India has steel balls they have taken out..not only this guy but also few heads in Australia and UK too.....

 

 

 

Oppukuntav Anna maata. Nice.

 

Posted
4 minutes ago, pizzaaddict said:

I thought he was Saudi citizen . All this drama is considering the sikhs support to current ruling government and they want to show that they offer support to them . Like imran did drama for article 370 and  drama is to appease their voters

Finally emantav bro? Politics kosam religion ni vadukovadam tappantava? 

Posted
6 minutes ago, JavaBava said:

Finally emantav bro? Politics kosam religion ni vadukovadam tappantava? 

Situational politics r fine , as long as it does not impact huge population 

Posted
12 minutes ago, pizzaaddict said:

Situational politics r fine , as long as it does not impact huge population 

Religion impacts large population. So we should not use it as leverage for votes antava? 

Posted
23 minutes ago, JavaBava said:

Religion impacts large population. So we should not use it as leverage for votes antava? 

Using religion is ok as long as it does not impact  others . Like Bjp using hindutva for votes  polarization & Hindus are relatively supporting the party in comparison to the past . But the overall negative impact on minorities is minimum with exception of some instances ( but liberal media voice is completely opposite on bjp when it comes to minorities) 

Posted
7 minutes ago, pizzaaddict said:

Using religion is ok as long as it does not impact  others . Like Bjp using hindutva for votes  polarization & Hindus are relatively supporting the party in comparison to the past . But the overall negative impact on minorities is minimum with exception of some instances ( but liberal media voice is completely opposite on bjp when it comes to minorities) 

So what trudeau did has much bigger global impact? 

Posted
1 minute ago, JavaBava said:

So what trudeau did has much bigger global impact? 

Canada lo sikh votes kosam vadichina statement tappu antava? Dani valla konni vela mandiki harm jarugutunda? 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...