Are desis treated like porkis and negros by foreigners?

[Saloly]

 

 

 

[Saloly]

In the above Indians appeared a couple of times

[veerigadu]

Unfortunately it’s game over for thellas in general. They didn’t breed enough. They do lag in that aspect. They will perish in next 200 years 

[Tryad]

pathetic the kind of idiots that keep posting in this forum with supreme confidence. disgusting, in fact.

white nationalist chethha antha siggey lekunda vomiting here.

fcuking slaves.

[Tryad]

Indian site ki vachina, white nationalist ki bj ichhey post lu. em kharma ra babu.

do they consider us same as africans anta.. white people are done because they didn't breed enough anta.

entha saduvukuni enti laabham. brain edhagaley beyond making money, that even well trained AI can do in the future. dumb people are just disgusting.

[veerigadu]

3 minutes ago, Tryad said:

Indian site ki vachina, white nationalist ki bj ichhey post lu. em kharma ra babu.

do they consider us same as africans anta.. white people are done because they didn't breed enough anta.

entha saduvukuni enti laabham. brain edhagaley beyond making money, that even well trained AI can do in the future. dumb people are just disgusting.

Global ga white population growth ni Africans, thuraks, Indians, Chinese and Hispanics to compare cheyyi. They do lag by a mile. I’m not taking about superiority of race or anything here. I’m talking about numbers. Yes, white people are like an endangered species. 

[Telugodura456]

2 minutes ago, veerigadu said:

Global ga white population growth ni Africans, thuraks, Indians, Chinese and Hispanics to compare cheyyi. They do lag by a mile. I’m not taking about superiority of race or anything here. I’m talking about numbers. Yes, white people are like an endangered species. 

There are about 800 million thellas in world - 400 million in europe and another 400 in americas and some minor in australia etc. They control more than 50% land of earth (russia alone is huge) and are the wealthiest and dominate media/culture.

I think they are fine and not endangered in anyway.

[Tryad]

6 minutes ago, veerigadu said:

Global ga white population growth ni Africans, thuraks, Indians, Chinese and Hispanics to compare cheyyi. They do lag by a mile. I’m not taking about superiority of race or anything here. I’m talking about numbers. Yes, white people are like an endangered species. 

stupid a$$.. just stfu. pick up an actual book and read. race is not a biological category. whiteness is a cultural construct.

irish, italian were not white 50yrs ago, now they are. russians are not considered white in europe, depending on convenience.

reddies, kammas who come into a lot of wealth start aping brahmins and try to become brahmins culturally.

white people will always exist, just like brahmins will always exist, as long as people like you believe and want to uphold social hierarchies that give your life some meaning.
 

[Tryad]

13 minutes ago, veerigadu said:

Global ga white population growth ni Africans, thuraks, Indians, Chinese and Hispanics to compare cheyyi. They do lag by a mile. I’m not taking about superiority of race or anything here. I’m talking about numbers. Yes, white people are like an endangered species. 

anyone who matches the whites in wealth and power, will be absorbed into the white population. that's how it works.

Indians themselves will be considered to be white in a couple generations. there will always be an upperclass. the name for that is 'white' in the US.. 'brahmins' in India.

 

[Tryad]

aren't you the one who's claiming that he married a white person?

is your kid considered white or not?

[Telugodura456]

7 minutes ago, Tryad said:

stupid a$$.. just stfu. pick up an actual book and read. race is not a biological category. whiteness is a cultural construct.

irish, italian were not white 50yrs ago, now they are. russians are not considered white in europe, depending on convenience.

reddies, kammas who come into a lot of wealth start aping brahmins and try to become brahmins culturally.

white people will always exist, just like brahmins will always exist, as long as people like you believe and want to uphold social hierarchies that give your life some meaning.
 

Aapara baabu. @veerigadu is talking about commonly understood meaning of whites - esp from an american point of view - its any person from european origin with christian or jewish background. Ee theories endhi ?

[Tryad]

Just now, Telugodura456 said:

Aapara baabu. @veerigadu is talking about commonly understood meaning of whites - esp from an american point of view - its any person from european origin with christian or jewish background. Ee theories endhi ?

commonly understood meaning of whites has to do with wealth and power of a community.

he's talking about white nationalist understanding of whiteness. the inconsistent low iq understanding of what whiteness means.. because it is going to include russians, kazhakhs, turks everyone into the mix, which again they disagree with.

[Tryad]

indian power structure depends not just on brahmins btw, it includes banias and kshatriyas too.

every other caste wants to become them.. even wealthy ones like kamma, reddies.

 

[Telugodura456]

3 minutes ago, Tryad said:

commonly understood meaning of whites has to do with wealth and power of a community.

he's talking about white nationalist understanding of whiteness. the inconsistent low iq understanding of what whiteness means.. because it is going to include russians, kazhakhs, turks everyone into the mix, which again they disagree with.

I understand where you are coming from. Whiteness as set of social/legal privileges . But that is not what is being discussed here. He is talking about white as derived from european origin no matter whether they are poor or rich.

There maybe some confusion around margins like kazhaks  but the common  definition works well for  well over 90 percent of people.

 

[Tryad]

Just now, Telugodura456 said:

I understand where you are coming from. Whiteness as set of social/legal privileges . But that is not what is being discussed here. He is talking about white as derived from european origin no matter whether they are poor or rich.

There maybe some confusion around margins like kazhaks  but the common  definition works well for  well over 90 percent of people.

 

you should tell that to the Ukrainian nationalists that are campaigning online about the 'Asian'ness of Russians, and how Europe should help them defend their territory against non-white invaders.

white nationalist definition of whiteness is neither consistent nor useful except for racists and ethnonationalists, who want to keep other people out.

its pathetic that Indians living in the west parrot that language without understanding what it means at the most basic level.