Which place in world has best public transport?

[venkappa]

1 hour ago, dasari4kntr said:

nenu use chesina vaatillo…

NYC - very good

Hyd - ok

Chennai, Bangalore - worst

Johannesburg - danger 

 

 

but UK nenu visit cheyyaledhu…but family members visited…according to them london public transport is also good..

Bangalore city council too cucked to give their citizens actual public transport.

[bommali]

Germany

[trent]

sweden, norway

[Konebhar6]

11 hours ago, venkappa said:

Based on your experiences. 

Nothing comes closer to Switzerland. They built public transport so well that from your home or hotel to any place, you can go using public transport. Valla income is based on tourism, they made it tourist friendly.

[jalsa01]

Singapore

European capital cities..

[kevinUsa]

15 hours ago, Gorantlamdhav said:

Serbia bavuntadi 

Ekkada sir 

Serbia aa na ??

Airport nundi downtown buses unnaya ??

Asalu mottam taxis ee 

20€ 

[kevinUsa]

16 hours ago, venkappa said:

Based on your experiences. 

Personally Chusina vatilo 

Montreal Canada

London UK..

Chicago  ande Seattle too

 

[bharathicement]

14 hours ago, Raja_Returns said:

Ind - TG lo ma Nalgonda ni kotte place ledu

ekadaki povali anna palle velugu lekapothe auto lu

Drivers Kuda andaru friendly ga untaru

You must be trying to joke, but in reality this is 100% true.

Been there to Nalgonda, Warangal in TG and Eluru, Rajahmundry, Tuni, Tenali...you have human connectivity more than luxury of comfort.

To be brutally honest, if you have some money and good connections, nothing beats India.

Coming to main topic, Hyd, Bangalore and Chennai --> all three became hell holes of late.

[andhra_jp]

Singapore , london , many indian cities(buses, auto , ola/uber)  , Paris ... 

Infact public transport in Europe is much better than USA

 

[venkappa]

6 hours ago, andhra_jp said:

Singapore , london , many indian cities(buses, auto , ola/uber)  , Paris ... 

Infact public transport in Europe is much better than USA

 

US is too car centric to invest in public transport. Car lobbyists even prevented transport development.

[Konebhar6]

India is not bad. Most cities have bus/Train facilities. For the population we have and the concentration of population in cities, connectivity in cities is not bad. May be a little chaotic but it works.

[venkappa]

1 hour ago, Konebhar6 said:

India is not bad. Most cities have bus/Train facilities. For the population we have and the concentration of population in cities, connectivity in cities is not bad. May be a little chaotic but it works.

Mumbai is pretty impressive considering amount of people it deals with. 

Bangalore could be much better.

[Konebhar6]

6 minutes ago, venkappa said:

Mumbai is pretty impressive considering amount of people it deals with. 

Bangalore could be much better.

Completely agree.

[Raven_Rayes]

27 minutes ago, venkappa said:

Mumbai is pretty impressive considering amount of people it deals with. 

Bangalore could be much better.

the more people live in a dense area, the easier and better it is to build a public transit. India can't do even the most basic things at an acceptable level.

I don't think anyone has actually used public transport in India, outside of highly subsized metros (freebie for upper class), and the odd journey in the city bus, when you can find a seat.

it is hell for regular users. there's not enough frequency.

those who use car cannot notice how pathetic public transport is in India.

[Raven_Rayes]

switzerland does have the best public transport in the world, but there's a catch. Its not actually a decent place to live.