400 acres HCU Campus

[appusri]

1 hour ago, vetrivel said:

Shameless pacha hamas 

 

Thupuk on labor Nandamuri slaves 

Fake factory

 

[appusri]

27 minutes ago, vetrivel said:

Thatki budda pervert Sr Ntr pacha hamas gang

 

Spreading fake news 

 

Licking gumpu for the sake of their master railway station pickpocketer

Intha fake entra meeru?

 

[vetrivel]

25 minutes ago, appusri said:

Nuvvu chese gabbu panini verevallaki endhuku chepthunnav ra Vetri?

Lol tharki budda Sr Ntr pacha hamas getting triggered

 

As always spreading fake news

 

Licking whoever their master licks

 

Most shameless bunch ever

 

You will find definition of self respect in pacha hamas dictionary

[appusri]

6 minutes ago, vetrivel said:

Lol tharki budda Sr Ntr pacha hamas getting triggered

 

As always spreading fake news

 

Licking whoever their master licks

 

Most shameless bunch ever

 

You will find definition of self respect in pacha hamas dictionary

 

[appusri]

7 minutes ago, vetrivel said:

Lol tharki budda Sr Ntr pacha hamas getting triggered

 

As always spreading fake news

 

Licking whoever their master licks

 

Most shameless bunch ever

 

You will find definition of self respect in pacha hamas dictionary

 

[appusri]

10 minutes ago, vetrivel said:

Lol tharki budda Sr Ntr pacha hamas getting triggered

 

As always spreading fake news

 

Licking whoever their master licks

 

Most shameless bunch ever

 

You will find definition of self respect in pacha hamas dictionary

 

[vetrivel]

14 minutes ago, vetrivel said:

Lol tharki budda Sr Ntr pacha hamas getting triggered

 

As always spreading fake news

 

Licking whoever their master licks

 

Most shameless bunch ever

 

You will find definition of self respect in pacha hamas dictionary

*will never

[vetrivel]

6 minutes ago, appusri said:

 

Most shameless lying bunch the pacha hamas

 

They will destroy everyone 

 

Now helping gumpu mestri destroy telangana 

 

Which was single handedly developed by Kcr and ktr

[appusri]

1 minute ago, vetrivel said:

Most shameless lying bunch the pacha hamas

 

They will destroy everyone 

 

Now helping gumpu mestri destroy telangana 

 

Which was single handedly developed by Kcr and ktr

 

[appusri]

1 minute ago, vetrivel said:

Most shameless lying bunch the pacha hamas

 

They will destroy everyone 

 

Now helping gumpu mestri destroy telangana 

 

Which was single handedly developed by Kcr and ktr

 

[appusri]

2 minutes ago, vetrivel said:

Most shameless lying bunch the pacha hamas

 

They will destroy everyone 

 

Now helping gumpu mestri destroy telangana 

 

Which was single handedly developed by Kcr and ktr

 

[appusri]

18 minutes ago, vetrivel said:

Most shameless lying bunch the pacha hamas

 

They will destroy everyone 

 

Now helping gumpu mestri destroy telangana 

 

Which was single handedly developed by Kcr and ktr

 

[Joker_007]

12 hours ago, CanadianMalodu said:

Forest land definition meedha supreme court multiple times judgement ichindhi. Read 1969 Maganti vs State of Andhra Pradesh. You will see Supreme Court supporting the interpretation that any land that looks like Forest land can be deemed forest land with government notifying it so ani. That's the basis for PIL in Telanagana High Court. Andhuke kadha Revantham ippudu PR cover drive mode lo digadu

 

The Supreme Court, in Maganti Subramanyan v. State of Andhra Pradesh (1969), emphasized that the determination of forest land depends on its characteristics and usage, rather than just its classification in revenue records. The key characteristics that courts generally consider when determining whether land qualifies as forest land include:

1. Vegetation and Tree Cover

• Presence of naturally grown trees, shrubs, and other vegetation.

• Whether the land is thickly wooded or has significant forest growth.

2. Ecological and Environmental Role

• Whether the land plays a role in maintaining ecological balance.

• Presence of wildlife or biodiversity typical of forest areas.

3. Historical and Traditional Use

• Whether the land has traditionally been used as a forest area.

• If the land has been under forest management or conservation programs.

4. Revenue and Legal Records

• Though not the sole criterion, the classification in revenue records as ‘forest’ or ‘reserved land’ can be an indicator.

• If the land was ever declared as protected under any forest law.

5. Actual Utilization

• Whether the land was ever used for agriculture or other non-forest purposes.

• Whether the land has been left undisturbed and preserved over time.

6. Proximity to Existing Forest Areas

• If the land is adjacent to a protected forest, reserve forest, or wildlife sanctuary, it is more likely to be considered forest land.

7. Government Notifications & Policies

• If any government notification or policy designates the land as forest.

Court's Key Takeaway

The Supreme Court held that forest land is determined based on its actual physical characteristics and historical use rather than just its official classification. Even if a land parcel is not formally notified as a forest, it can still be considered forest land based on its natural characteristics.

 

Again Each case depends on expert opinions, satellite imagery, and historical records, i do not think this would fall into the forest category... lets see how SC defines it...  

[tollywood_hater]

3 minutes ago, Joker_007 said:

The Supreme Court, in Maganti Subramanyan v. State of Andhra Pradesh (1969), emphasized that the determination of forest land depends on its characteristics and usage, rather than just its classification in revenue records. The key characteristics that courts generally consider when determining whether land qualifies as forest land include:

1. Vegetation and Tree Cover

• Presence of naturally grown trees, shrubs, and other vegetation.

• Whether the land is thickly wooded or has significant forest growth.

2. Ecological and Environmental Role

• Whether the land plays a role in maintaining ecological balance.

• Presence of wildlife or biodiversity typical of forest areas.

3. Historical and Traditional Use

• Whether the land has traditionally been used as a forest area.

• If the land has been under forest management or conservation programs.

4. Revenue and Legal Records

• Though not the sole criterion, the classification in revenue records as ‘forest’ or ‘reserved land’ can be an indicator.

• If the land was ever declared as protected under any forest law.

5. Actual Utilization

• Whether the land was ever used for agriculture or other non-forest purposes.

• Whether the land has been left undisturbed and preserved over time.

6. Proximity to Existing Forest Areas

• If the land is adjacent to a protected forest, reserve forest, or wildlife sanctuary, it is more likely to be considered forest land.

7. Government Notifications & Policies

• If any government notification or policy designates the land as forest.

Court's Key Takeaway

The Supreme Court held that forest land is determined based on its actual physical characteristics and historical use rather than just its official classification. Even if a land parcel is not formally notified as a forest, it can still be considered forest land based on its natural characteristics.

 

Again Each case depends on expert opinions, satellite imagery, and historical records, i do not think this would fall into the forest category... lets see how SC defines it...  

@afdb_bot summary in 2 lines please 

[CanadianMalodu]

20 minutes ago, Joker_007 said:

The Supreme Court, in Maganti Subramanyan v. State of Andhra Pradesh (1969), emphasized that the determination of forest land depends on its characteristics and usage, rather than just its classification in revenue records. The key characteristics that courts generally consider when determining whether land qualifies as forest land include:

1. Vegetation and Tree Cover

• Presence of naturally grown trees, shrubs, and other vegetation.

• Whether the land is thickly wooded or has significant forest growth.

2. Ecological and Environmental Role

• Whether the land plays a role in maintaining ecological balance.

• Presence of wildlife or biodiversity typical of forest areas.

3. Historical and Traditional Use

• Whether the land has traditionally been used as a forest area.

• If the land has been under forest management or conservation programs.

4. Revenue and Legal Records

• Though not the sole criterion, the classification in revenue records as ‘forest’ or ‘reserved land’ can be an indicator.

• If the land was ever declared as protected under any forest law.

5. Actual Utilization

• Whether the land was ever used for agriculture or other non-forest purposes.

• Whether the land has been left undisturbed and preserved over time.

6. Proximity to Existing Forest Areas

• If the land is adjacent to a protected forest, reserve forest, or wildlife sanctuary, it is more likely to be considered forest land.

7. Government Notifications & Policies

• If any government notification or policy designates the land as forest.

Court's Key Takeaway

The Supreme Court held that forest land is determined based on its actual physical characteristics and historical use rather than just its official classification. Even if a land parcel is not formally notified as a forest, it can still be considered forest land based on its natural characteristics.

 

Again Each case depends on expert opinions, satellite imagery, and historical records, i do not think this would fall into the forest category... lets see how SC defines it...  

Yep, That's what I said. 

*Without ani type cheyyalsina chota, with ani padindhi.