hunkyfunky3 Posted April 19 Report Posted April 19 I realized why ... Movie is 80% fictional...yes, he fought against ourangajeb but there's too much cinematic liberties taken Quote
Popular Post dasari4kntr Posted April 19 Popular Post Report Posted April 19 he fought again mogul…thats its…he is great king… there is no other kings in india like ashoka…chola or mourya…etc ….our jombies recognizes only who fought against moghals or muslims…other hindu kings fought with hindu kings…so it doesn’t fit their heroic narrative brainwashing… ఇంకా ఎక్కువ మాట్లాడితే …అశోకుడే లేడు చరిత్రలో అందాం…అంతేనా జాంబీస్.. 1 3 Quote
Android_Halwa Posted April 19 Report Posted April 19 Sambhaji is more recognized within the marathi circles...almost every Marathi manoos identifies sambhaji... Just like Alluri Seetharama Raju is more popular in north coastal Andhra than else where... 2 Quote
Android_Halwa Posted April 19 Report Posted April 19 Arei bewakoof ga, cholas, guptas, or perhaps any kingdom/kings who fought before the advent of islam or foreign invasion, the then era la kings fought for their kingdom and reign... Following the foreign invasion, the struggle extended beyond a king defending their kingdom—it became a battle to preserve their culture, identity, and resist the brutality imposed upon them. 2 Quote
Teluguredu Posted April 19 Report Posted April 19 10 hours ago, Android_Halwa said: Arei bewakoof ga, cholas, guptas, or perhaps any kingdom/kings who fought before the advent of islam or foreign invasion, the then era la kings fought for their kingdom and reign... Following the foreign invasion, the struggle extended beyond a king defending their kingdom—it became a battle to preserve their culture, identity, and resist the brutality imposed upon them. not really they fought for their kingdom just like they did before. every other kingdom is a foreign kingdom. Many Kings have allied with muslims to fight against their enemies. Quote
Teluguredu Posted April 19 Report Posted April 19 Of course that's to be expected , hyping up every chota mota king just cause they fought against muslims . These kunbis or marathas support or worship shivaji or other kings cause they belong to same caste and kunbis form a huge portion of maharastra . I don't know why telugu people are tearing their chaddis for them lol .especially telangana people. 1 Quote
Teluguredu Posted April 19 Report Posted April 19 Telangana people should come out of slave mentality for indo-aryans and even some andhra people. Turkas in hyd ,north indians both come from same breed .kick them all out.they are using religion card so they can be free to do whatever they want in your homeland. Quote
HighlyRespected Posted April 19 Report Posted April 19 Read wiki on shambaji....he was bad man veedu his father shivaji aganist ga moguls tho kalisi fight chesadu... 1 Quote
Android_Halwa Posted April 19 Report Posted April 19 1 hour ago, Teluguredu said: not really they fought for their kingdom just like they did before. every other kingdom is a foreign kingdom. Many Kings have allied with muslims to fight against their enemies. Well, that has changed the course of our history and hence the significance. Quote
Teluguredu Posted April 19 Report Posted April 19 44 minutes ago, Android_Halwa said: Well, that has changed the course of our history and hence the significance. What has. Quote
Thokkalee Posted April 19 Report Posted April 19 After independence, We had an overdose of stories/movies/books on Muslim kings fighting against Britishers and love stories of Muslim kings, who married tens of women.. like Salim-anarkali (Jagangir), Jodha Akbar, Shahjahan-Mumtaj, etc etc. Tipu Sultan was glorified to a great extent.. he not only fought against the British, but also against the Marathas and Hyderabad nawabs.. now we are getting an overdose of the Hindu kings who fought against the Muslim kings.. 1 Quote
enigmatic Posted April 19 Report Posted April 19 2 hours ago, HighlyRespected said: Read wiki on shambaji....he was bad man Naaku ade anipinchindi. But cinema historical accuracy tho teesthe marathi vallu feel avutaremo Quote
Samajavaragamanaa Posted April 19 Report Posted April 19 14 hours ago, hunkyfunky3 said: I realized why ... Movie is 80% fictional...yes, he fought against ourangajeb but there's too much cinematic liberties taken Quote
Samajavaragamanaa Posted April 19 Report Posted April 19 22 minutes ago, enigmatic said: Naaku ade anipinchindi. But cinema historical accuracy tho teesthe marathi vallu feel avutaremo Where did you go ra Quote
Dhevudu2 Posted April 19 Report Posted April 19 14 hours ago, dasari4kntr said: he fought again mogul…thats its…he is great king… there is no other kings in india like ashoka…chola or mourya…etc ….our jombies recognizes only who fought against moghals or muslims…other hindu kings fought with hindu kings…so it doesn’t fit their heroic narrative brainwashing… ఇంకా ఎక్కువ మాట్లాడితే …అశోకుడే లేడు చరిత్రలో అందాం…అంతేనా జాంబీస్.. Baga frustration. Lo vunnav thatha challabadu Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.