Sinthakai Posted July 1 Report Posted July 1 14 minutes ago, Android_Halwa said: And by the way, I donโt quote proofs. Not my style. I claim facts, burden is on your to check for the facts. And halwai is never wrong, esp with yellow matter. Lol ๐๐๐Super bhayya๐๐๐I hope you find peace. Quote
Android_Halwa Posted July 1 Report Posted July 1 47 minutes ago, Sinthakai said: ๐๐๐Super bhayya๐๐๐I hope you find peace. Sarekani, June 2024 la Ashok Leyalans plant construction start pedithe March 2025 ki complete ayi production start ayindi antavโฆ Anthe kada ? Like 10 months..!! Quote
idibezwada Posted July 1 Report Posted July 1 1 hour ago, Android_Halwa said: Banakacherlaโฆ Nallamalla nundi almost 100 kmsโฆwith planned under ground tunnels, going through dense tiger core area.. Asalu etla vastadi anukunaru vaa permission ? Evadra a burra leni bajji na koduku ie project tayarchesindi ?ย Core la bitumen topped road eyanike permissions vundaduโฆmeeru ekanga sorangalu tovvvutara ?ย ย Ediki poinaru pulka batchโฆokkadu kanipistaledu. new one which andriod anna predicted... Quote
Sinthakai Posted July 1 Report Posted July 1 49 minutes ago, Android_Halwa said: Sarekani, June 2024 la Ashok Leyalans plant construction start pedithe March 2025 ki complete ayi production start ayindi antavโฆ Anthe kada ? Like 10 months..!! Bhayya, it was started during first Chemba rule, hit a snag because if covid and was completed during the second time. ย Quote
Android_Halwa Posted July 1 Report Posted July 1 51 minutes ago, idibezwada said: new one which andriod anna predicted... Intaki, tenders pilustunaru anta kadaโฆ AI tho designed anta kadaโฆ Quote
akkum_bakkum Posted July 1 Report Posted July 1 2 hours ago, Android_Halwa said: Oh my banakacherlaโฆ.arey source itself is from Polavaramโฆ.behind the dam, there is an entire area which is about to be submerged. Ikadinunde ra ayya meeru polavaran canal nundi water divert chesukunediโฆ FYI, godavari depth is very low so much so that its just not possible to divertโฆ.you need to store upto a level and then only divert. without dam, divert chesede vunte polavaram enduku kaka inka ? Common sense use cheyโฆtry to understand the terms MSL, Height, Storage etc. gravity etc. I know your yellow compulsions but some things are just facts and by denying such facts, you really need to work over time without pay just to convince your agenda. Polavaram is a dam, not a barrage....Dams create reservoirs...I know these facts. aa godava aipoyindi. Ilanti lolli chestharani telise mumpu mandalalanni AP lo kalipesaru overnight. Lekunte aa project ni munduki ponichetolla dora and co? Original estimate lo 45.5m vunna height ni mee jaggadu dora tho compromise ayyi 41m ki tagginiki oppukunnadu...that leaves room for more storeage if needed, after govt change the dam height is secured back to 45.5m. Besides the topic, the water for supply is never intended for storage in polavaram dam....Plan is to let the water flow towards banakacherla while filling the povaram reservoir based on inflow and upstream flood conditions. Project is ambitious....120km forest range vundi...adi major hurdle and multiple locations lo water lift cheyyali. TG never objected on the fact that it could submerge Telangana land...Its main dispute and worry is the 200 TMC water allocation to banakacherla. Nuvvemo land munigipothundani addagoluga chepthav. Center objection pettindi main ga TG tho resolve cheskondi and environmental clearance thechukondi ani.... Quote
Android_Halwa Posted July 1 Report Posted July 1 13 minutes ago, akkum_bakkum said: Polavaram is a dam, not a barrage....Dams create reservoirs...I know these facts. aa godava aipoyindi. Ilanti lolli chestharani telise mumpu mandalalanni AP lo kalipesaru overnight. Lekunte aa project ni munduki ponichetolla dora and co? Original estimate lo 45.5m vunna height ni mee jaggadu dora tho compromise ayyi 41m ki tagginiki oppukunnadu...that leaves room for more storeage if needed, after govt change the dam height is secured back to 45.5m. Besides the topic, the water for supply is never intended for storage in polavaram dam....Plan is to let the water flow towards banakacherla while filling the povaram reservoir based on inflow and upstream flood conditions. Project is ambitious....120km forest range vundi...adi major hurdle and multiple locations lo water lift cheyyali. TG never objected on the fact that it could submerge Telangana land...Its main dispute and worry is the 200 TMC water allocation to banakacherla. Nuvvemo land munigipothundani addagoluga chepthav. Center objection pettindi main ga TG tho resolve cheskondi and environmental clearance thechukondi ani.... Oh my banakacherla againโฆ Polavaram was planned to be a dam, but is a glorified barrage now. Jaggadi mida concentration tho development antha marichipoinatu vunnav, actually miss ayinav.ย ย Malli okasari Eputha, clear ga vinu. Telangana la bhadrachalam submerge avanidi polavaram tho etuvanti upayigam ledu. Seven mandals tho saha Telangana bhadrachalam few villages are marked submerged. Irrepevtive of banka banakacherla, it is submerged. ย Meeru canal through lift chetstavo, gravity through teesukapotavo, leka kothaga quantum valley la AI use chesi design chestavo, mumpu lekunda okka drop kusa rayalaseema ki teesukellalev Nuv aw cheptunav sumberge ani, ipudemo telangana la emi munagaledu antavโฆnuv emi matladutunavo niku aina clarity vunda ? I understand the compulsion hereโฆ Simple ga septha vinuโฆPolavaram canal and water is sourced from a height, not at river level. When this happen, certain areas are unindated, maa segara dobbesina seven mandals tho paatu bhadrachalam lo kuda few villages gets submerged. Irrswpvtive if banka, this is fact. Banka ki teesukivelle canal kuda ikadinundeโฆ Munagaledu antavโฆvokay. Munagaledu. Environmental clearance bhool jao..mundu chepina, ipudu cheptunnaโฆupper riparian states agrrement kakunda nuv ae project build cheyalevโฆnallamalla tiger ilaka la natakalu saagavu, leader ae vundani, adi vision ae vundaniโฆAI Quantum ani kathalu sepithe nadavadu.. Plusโฆexpecting cebter to grant 60k out of 90k, etla kanipistunaru ? Polavaram ki iyaki, banka ki iyaliโฆinkemaina ichedi vunda ? Asalu feasibility study chesinara ? Expert commitee ? CE recommendation ?ย Quote
akkum_bakkum Posted July 1 Report Posted July 1 57 minutes ago, Android_Halwa said: Oh my banakacherla againโฆ Polavaram was planned to be a dam, but is a glorified barrage now. Jaggadi mida concentration tho development antha marichipoinatu vunnav, actually miss ayinav.ย ย Malli okasari Eputha, clear ga vinu. Telangana la bhadrachalam submerge avanidi polavaram tho etuvanti upayigam ledu. Seven mandals tho saha Telangana bhadrachalam few villages are marked submerged. Irrepevtive of banka banakacherla, it is submerged. ย Meeru canal through lift chetstavo, gravity through teesukapotavo, leka kothaga quantum valley la AI use chesi design chestavo, mumpu lekunda okka drop kusa rayalaseema ki teesukellalev Nuv aw cheptunav sumberge ani, ipudemo telangana la emi munagaledu antavโฆnuv emi matladutunavo niku aina clarity vunda ? I understand the compulsion hereโฆ Simple ga septha vinuโฆPolavaram canal and water is sourced from a height, not at river level. When this happen, certain areas are unindated, maa segara dobbesina seven mandals tho paatu bhadrachalam lo kuda few villages gets submerged. Irrswpvtive if banka, this is fact. Banka ki teesukivelle canal kuda ikadinundeโฆ Munagaledu antavโฆvokay. Munagaledu. Environmental clearance bhool jao..mundu chepina, ipudu cheptunnaโฆupper riparian states agrrement kakunda nuv ae project build cheyalevโฆnallamalla tiger ilaka la natakalu saagavu, leader ae vundani, adi vision ae vundaniโฆAI Quantum ani kathalu sepithe nadavadu.. Plusโฆexpecting cebter to grant 60k out of 90k, etla kanipistunaru ? Polavaram ki iyaki, banka ki iyaliโฆinkemaina ichedi vunda ? Asalu feasibility study chesinara ? Expert commitee ? CE recommendation ?ย Ideppatnunchi....mee mahametha gadu cm ga vunna timelone Maharashtra baabli project kattindi...velli protests chesaru antha kante emanna peekagaligirra? Whether banakacherla is realized or not, mumpu jaruguthadi...I'm saying anything beyond that level is not required for this new project. Already vunna mumpu land kante ekkuva land munagadu ee project valla...adi chepthunte neekardam kaaaka naa meeda paduthunnavanthe...typical hater mindset. DPR submit chesthene ga cheppindi center...Get EIA and clearance from NGT ani cheppi venakki pampindi. Its not a denial, but stakeholder consultations required ani cheppindi. Mee professor kuda ide cheppindu chudu kinda. Bhadrachalam munagakunda polavaram kattalemanta...ippudu already kaduthunnaru, and AP em dobbeila...TG ne bhadrachalam revenue division dobbesindi AP nunchi. Charithra telusuko. Mullah galla M antha baa nachinda. If not for mullah intervention kakathiya and sathavahana times nunchi okate vundedi. thats a different unrelated subject le. ย ย ย Quote
Android_Halwa Posted July 1 Report Posted July 1 30 minutes ago, akkum_bakkum said: mumpu jaruguthadi Aham Brahmasmi..!! By the way, Babli kadtunapudu cinema susukuntu kurchunadu mee visionaryโฆ.teera CM padavi poinaka babli ani lolli chesindiโฆ Emi cinema susinda ? Idena vision ?ย Quote
Himanshuu Posted July 1 Report Posted July 1 52 minutes ago, Android_Halwa said: Aham Brahmasmi..!! By the way, Babli kadtunapudu cinema susukuntu kurchunadu mee visionaryโฆ.teera CM padavi poinaka babli ani lolli chesindiโฆ Emi cinema susinda ? Idena vision ?ย bosedk halwa harish gadi balls notlo pettukoraย Quote
akkum_bakkum Posted July 1 Report Posted July 1 54 minutes ago, Android_Halwa said: Aham Brahmasmi..!! By the way, Babli kadtunapudu cinema susukuntu kurchunadu mee visionaryโฆ.teera CM padavi poinaka babli ani lolli chesindiโฆ Emi cinema susinda ? Idena vision ?ย Question was never about mumpu jaruguthunda leda.....u said extra mumpu only coz of banakacherla...this case does not exist. Anyway, inkenni cheppina nee hatred flower vinnivvadu le...nee flow lo continue chastising, adega mana pani. Quote
Android_Halwa Posted July 1 Report Posted July 1 9 minutes ago, akkum_bakkum said: Question was never about mumpu jaruguthunda leda.....u said extra mumpu only coz of banakacherla...this case does not exist. Anyway, inkenni cheppina nee hatred flower vinnivvadu le...nee flow lo continue chastising, adega mana pani. Question was always about Mumpu. It was never about extra munpu. Inkentha munchutar ra ayya, munchindi salada ? Hatred antaโฆlol, Naku vunnadi hatred aithe mari neeku vunnadi endi ? Pyar mihabbat insaniyaat antava ? Podduna lesthe chesedi pacha batch bhajana, leni project ki mee leader usko ante pani kattukuni kasko antunav, ninnu emanali mari ? Bankacherla ledu banakacherla leduโฆ.90k crores anta,60k crs center iyalnanta, permissions anni ochesinayi anta, repo mapo tender pilustadu antaโฆ Eyyi na rajaโฆpagalakotturri chevulu.. Quote
andhra_jp Posted July 3 Report Posted July 3 Andhraโs Polavaram Banakacherla Project: Another Kaleshwaram in theย making? The Andhra Pradeshโs proposed Polavaram Banakacherla Link Project (PBLP) to transfer Godavari flood waters to Rayalseema region through massively power consuming multi stage lift irrigation projects has all the signs like the ill-fated and controversial Kaleshwaram project of neighbouring Telangana. Like Kaleshwaram, it is also hugely expensive. Like Kaleshwaram, it is also based on using Godavari waters. And like in case of Kaleshwaram, the ruling party of AP is in tearing hurry to push the project even before basic studies are done. In case of Kaleshwaram, Central Water Commission engineers were singing praise for the project before the projectโs central piece, the Medigadda barrage collapsed on Oct 21, 2023. Is there surplus water at Polavaram?ย Strangely, in case of PBLP, centre seems to have promised to fund 50% of the cost of the project even before projectโs prefeasibility report is approved and before the project gets any of its statutory approvals. Will PBLP face the same fate as that of Kaleshwaram? Theย Central Water Commissionโs 2018 report, stating no surplus water at Polavaram at 75% dependability, contradicted Andhra Pradeshโs floodwater diversion claims. MoEFโs EAC-RVP rejects TORC to PBLPย Union Governmentโs MoEFโs Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) meeting on River Valley Projects (RVP) held on June 17 2025 rejected the application of PBLP for clearance of Terms of Reference for doing Environment Impact Assessment. The committee has asked AP to first get clearance from the Central Water Commission (CWC) including from inter-state aspects. The minutes note: โAccordingly, the Committee recommended that the PP should comprehensively assess the availability of floodwaters in consultation with the Central Water Commission (CWC). Furthermore, the EAC noted that several representations have been received via email, alleging that the proposed scheme may be in violation of the Godavari Water Disputes Tribunal Award, 1980. In view of this, it is imperative that the PP should approach Central Water Commission (CWC) for examining the inter-state issues and granting necessary clearance/permission before submitting the proposal for framing the TOR for conducting EIA study. The EAC decided to return the proposal on the above lines.โ What is PBLP?ย The Andhra government plans to partly use Godavari flood water, proposed the river link from the Polavaram dam in north central Andhra to Banakacherla inย Pennar basin in the Rayalaseema region using Srisailam and Nagarjunsagar canals. The PBLP includes building a 416 km network of open canals, pipelines and lifts to draw 200 TMC (2 TMC (Thousand Million Cubic Feet) per day for about 100 flood days) of flood water at two TMC per day during the Godavari flood season. It is estimated to cost at least Rs 82,000 crore. The project is envisaged in three segments. First, to draw the Godavari flood water to the Prakasam Barrage on River Krishna at Vijayawada. The second stage involves pumping the water up with six lifts to the proposed major Bollapalli reservoir in the Palnadu/ย Guntur district. The first stepย would be to enhance the Polavaram Right Main Canalโs capacity from 17,500 cusecs to 38,000 cusecs to allow the transfer of Godavari water to Krishna. Then, the capacity of Thatipudi Lift Irrigation Schemeโs canal will be increased from 1,400 cusecs to 10,000 cusecs. A reservoir will then be constructed at Bollapalli in Guntur district, from where water will be lifted at a rate of 28,000 cusecs for transferring to the Banakacherla reservoir. Lift stations will be established at Harischandrapuram, Lingapuram, Vyyandana, Gangireddypalem, and Nakirekallu to pump water to the Bollapalli reservoir. The water will then be diverted to the Veligonda reservoir and Banakacherla reservoir via a tunnel passing through the Nallamala forest. Bollapalli, located amid hills, serves as a natural reservoir for 173 TMC gross water storage when the necessary structures are built there. The final segment involves transferring the water from Bollapalli to Banakacherla (Kurnool district), with three lift stations pumping up the water into two tunnels passing through the thick forested Nallamala Tiger Reserve. The power consumption figures for lifting the water in the last two segments are mind boggling 2,379 MW and 1,413 MW respectively. The Detailed Project Report of GBLP is in the works. Existing already at Banakacherla is a three-way cross regulator complex, feeding the backwater of Krishna river drawn through the Pothireddypadu head regulator at the Srisailam reservoir into the Telugu Ganga canal (supplying drinking water to Chennai), the Srisailam Right Bank Canal, and the Kurnool-Cuddapah Canal. The additional water brought by GBLP will allow to bring 7.5 lakh acre under irrigation in the Rayalaseema region, while also ensuring drinking water. Agriculture economist A Bhavani Prasad has warned that the PBLP threatens Vijayawada with flooding, as the Prakasam Barrageโs capacity is inadequate for the proposed water transfer. He emphasised that floodwater diversion requires a separate mechanism, not the existing canal system, to avoid disastrous consequences. The project is important politically too for Naidu, as it could enhance the Naiduโs TDPโs image in Rayalaseema, especially Kurnool and Kadapa regions which are a stronghold of Naiduโs AP rival YSRCP. On Polavaram project, the Union governmentโs MoEF issued a โstop workโ order due to project violations but it has been kept in abeyance by several extensions, most recently till July 2, 2026. This allowed the work to continue despite objections raised not only by Telangana but also Odisha and Chhattisgarh. Telangana opposes APโs Godavari Banakacherla Projectย The Chandrababu Naidu led Andhra government has proposed the PBLP, also called Godavari-Banakacherla link project (GBLP), but Telangana CM Revanth Reddy has said it is โagainst natural justice, interests, and water rights of people of Telanganaโ. Telangana CM has asked the Union Jal Shakti Minister CR Patil to reject the Pre-Feasibility Report (PFR) of GBLP, submitted by AP. Patil is likely to call a meeting of the two Chief Ministers. The Godavari-Banakacherla project was conceived by the earlier Telugu Desam Party (TDP) regime led by Naidu in 2018. It was called the โGodavari-Pennaโ river linking scheme at the time. After the party lost power in 2019, the new Y.S. Jaganmohan Reddy government renamed it as the Palnadu Drought Mitigation Project and even invited tenders. Telangana opposition party BRS leader T Harish Rao said the water interests of Telangana would be severely affected if Andhra Pradesh diverted 200 TMC ft from the Godavari even before the former exhausted its full share of 968 TMC ft. It is surprising that even as interstate disputes persist and the GBLP has none of the required statutory clearances, the centre has decided to consider GBLP as a national project and provide 50% funding for the project. That is a likely reason why the BJP leaders in Telangana are silent on the project even as Congress and BRS oppose the AP project. Onย June 19, Telangana CM Revanth Reddy conveyed to Union Jal Shakti Minister CR Patil that the project should not be cleared. Reddy also had demands for Telangana from Patil: Issue a no objection certificate allowing Telangana to utilise 1,500 tmc of water-1,000 tmc from the Godavari and 500 tmc from the Krishna rivers-with Union govt approval; grant clearances and allocate water for Telanganaโs priority projects, including Palamuru-Rangareddy Lift Irrigation Scheme, Sammakka-Sarakka barrage and Tummidihatti project. According to the 2014 AP Reorganisation Act, Telangana says, any new project must first be discussed and approved by the Godavari River Management Board and the Central Water Commission. Telanganaโs Irrigation Minister Uttam Kumar Reddy wrote a letter to Union Minister for Environment and Forest Bhupender Yadav, urging the government to reject the ToR sought by Andhra Pradesh. He pointed out that Andhra Pradesh planned to use the so-called flood water for the Godavari-Banakacherla project but the CWC guidelines suggested that flood water was not officially defined, measured or allocated for use by any state on an inter-state river, including the Godavari.ย Telangana raises concerns about Inchampally Nagarjunsagar Link ProjectThe proposed Inchampally Nagarjunsagar Link Project (INLP) proposes to transfer 148 TMC water from Godavari to Krishna river as part of the further transfer to Pennar and Cauvery. However, Telangana has raised concerns about the large scale submergence & displacement risks, water rights, cost sharing and environmental impacts of the project. It has proposed shifting the intake point upstream of Inchampalli to avoid conflict with the SammakkaโSarakka barrage and reduce land acquisition needs. In absence of basic details, it is not clear if Andhraโs PBLP is affecting the viability of the INLP, but that is likely to be the case. Under the circumstances, Centreโs hurry to promise funds for PBLP is surprising. In Conclusionย The Telugu states of Telangana and Andhra Pradesh seem to be fond of massively costly large scale irrigation projects. In recent decades, Polavaram to come up firs in the horizon. This expensive project that started twenty years ago is nowhere near completion and has seen several and even now ongoing disputes, violations, massive displacement, deforestation and also corruption charges. Telanganaโs Rs 1 lakh crore Kaleshwaram project was next in line, the full details of various aspects of this project are still unravelling. And now we have another massively expensive proposal. There is clearly a political economy of expensive large scale irrigation projects that is at play here. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.