american_desi Posted September 24 Report Posted September 24 2 minutes ago, Teluguredu said: That's only after operation polo, against his wishes.I am just saying what the ruler want doesn't matter compared to what the natives want because a lot of muslims ruled hindu majority areas and refused to accede to either country but were forced by government. Even junagarh in Gujarat was occupied by government after accession to pakistan because it was a Hindu majority region and a referendum was held against the wishes of ruler. By your logic Pakistan and Bangladesh should be Hindu countries forcibly Occupied by forefathers of Turaks living there ..why you never called them as Turaka occupied Sindh, Turaka occupied Punjab etc?. Quote
Teluguredu Posted September 24 Report Posted September 24 Just now, american_desi said: By your logic Pakistan and Bangladesh should be Hindu countries forcibly Occupied by forefathers of Turaks living there Maybe back then just after the muslim invasion,but now none of them would want to join india. Also they are the natives of that region ,they just changed their religion. Quote
american_desi Posted September 24 Report Posted September 24 6 minutes ago, Teluguredu said: Maybe back then just after the muslim invasion,but now none of them would want to join india. Also they are the natives of that region ,they just changed their religion. Did you see first hand ? That's the narrative planted by Turaka to gain legitimacy of their occupation of Hindu Lands Quote
Teluguredu Posted September 24 Report Posted September 24 4 hours ago, american_desi said: Did you see first hand ? That's the narrative planted by Turaka to gain legitimacy of their occupation of Hindu Lands they have zero foreign blood even some malayalis probably have more foreign blood than kashmiris. Maybe very negligible arab ancestry like 2-3% in a few people but you can find that even in hyderabadi muslims and even some Hindus in hyderabad who has relationship with muslims rulers. Quote
american_desi Posted September 24 Report Posted September 24 Just now, Teluguredu said: they have zero foreign blood even some malayalis probably have more foreign blood than kashmiris. Maybe very negligible arab ancestry like 2-3% in a few people but you can find that even in hyderabadi muslims and even some Hindus in hyderabad You went and did DNA test on each of them? So what happened to all invaders? They all died without any children? You think we are fools to believe what you write? Quote
Teluguredu Posted September 24 Report Posted September 24 1 minute ago, american_desi said: You went and did DNA test on each of them? So what happened to all invaders? They all died without any children? You think we are fools to believe what you write? The people who came from foreign lands are very less and very long ago ,they mostly mixed with indians and their foreign blood has diluted to negligible levels after centuries of staying here . That too you can only find traces of foreign ancestry in a few people who were ruling class . kashmiri Brahmins and muslim kashmiris will have the same blood, I mean muslims are just converts from Brahmins. Quote
BulletBaskar Posted September 24 Report Posted September 24 10 hours ago, balancer said: at the end all this hindutva drama is all about brahmin baniya authoritarianism they want old age manusmrithi constitution endo mee mushti lolli nuvu sambar gadi lekka unnave Quote
Teluguredu Posted September 24 Report Posted September 24 7 minutes ago, BulletBaskar said: endo mee mushti lolli nuvu sambar gadi lekka unnave most of the people in justice party (parent org of Dravidian parties) were telugu people. Identify the sambars vs telugu people here. Tamil- natesha mudaliar. Telugu -all the president's except pt rajan were telugu ,even ev ramaswamy has telugu ancestry. Malayali - T.M nair. Quote
rachaRimbola Posted September 24 Report Posted September 24 10 hours ago, balancer said: at the end all this hindutva drama is all about brahmin baniya authoritarianism they want old age manusmrithi constitution Do you even know what Manusmrithi is? It is not God given but it is written by scholars/intellectuals covering different perspectives. For example, if you read it, there will be arguments for PRO and AGAINST class system/varnas. Most of the stuff is written to project different point of views. It is like in school, we use to get an essay question in the end, that used to ask us about opinion and expand into an essay. For example, "Do you think industrialization is good for humankind?" Then you argue for either sides. Like industrialization brings prosperity, improves lifestyle, etc. At the same time, you can also put point that it will lead to deforestation, pollution, etc. The knowledge our rishis, scholars had was mind blowing. Current generation, their minds are mostly driven by agenda and hatred. PS: I'm not endorsing this Gadkari guy. He seems good on the surface but you never know 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.