Tejo Mahalaya EXPOSED The Fake History of the Taj Mahal

[rational]

 

[jpismahatma]

Good I saved lot of time. I don’t watch Hindi channels

[rational]

there are archaeological evidence of temples destroyed by Mughal kings but this taj mahal is completely Mughal construction. ASI have proven in the supreme court time and time again, but every few years this fake story keeps popping up.

[yslokesh]

8 minutes ago, rational said:

there are archaeological evidence of temples destroyed by Mughal kings but this taj mahal is completely Mughal construction. ASI have proven in the supreme court time and time again, but every few years this fake story keeps popping up.

haaa.because of this fake stories, the real vandalisms done by Aurangazeb, Babur and Akbar went into hiding.

 

[rational]

53 minutes ago, yslokesh said:

haaa.because of this fake stories, the real vandalisms done by Aurangazeb, Babur and Akbar went into hiding.

 

yupp! also hindu kings destroying hindu temples also went into hiding too..

[CanadianMalodu]

2 hours ago, rational said:

 

This is known for a long time. Repurposing the existing structures to suit the ruling party's needs (here Islamic rulers), has been a practice from a long time. 

Many temples were repurposed as such, e.g.Babri masjid, Gyan Vapi.  Desecrating the deity and using temple as a tomb was seen as a ultimate insult. That's why you see Tombs like Taj Mahal and dargahs. 

Unless the whole Taj Mahal is made public, you will never know what's being hidden from public.

[rational]

16 minutes ago, CanadianMalodu said:

This is known for a long time. Repurposing the existing structures to suit the ruling party's needs (here Islamic rulers), has been a practice from a long time. 

Many temples were repurposed as such, e.g.Babri masjid, Gyan Vapi.  Desecrating the dirty and using temple as a tomb was seen as a ultimate insult. That's why you see Tombs like Taj Mahal and dargahs. 

Unless the whole Taj Mahal is made public, you will never know what's being hidden from public.

There were few photos released by ASI in 2022 of restoration work. the reason that people were not allowed because of the deteriorating pillars and the seepage of water from the Yamuna river beside. If you read the ASI report they mentioned about the restoration works done periodically to protect the basement. That could be the main reason for not allowing public.

If you read the farman exchanges (actual archaelogical evidences that still exist) between raja jai singh and mughal court you will understand the transaction of land, how raja jai sing supplied marble for the construction etc. 

some example of restoration work released by ASI

Before

After

[Android_Halwa]

Forget about the facts, Mughal rulers built something like Taj Mahal ante I still won’t believe….their style of architecture is completely different and they are really bad at stone carvings…First time when I visited Taj, I literally spent the whole day admiring the architectural beauty of the structure…fine carvings, even quran verses which engraved in colored atones and embedded in the marble and that was such a fine piece of art and mughals were unable to create nothing even smaller or closer to Taj in their whole period.

[CanadianMalodu]

28 minutes ago, rational said:

There were few photos released by ASI in 2022 of restoration work. the reason that people were not allowed because of the deteriorating pillars and the seepage of water from the Yamuna river beside. If you read the ASI report they mentioned about the restoration works done periodically to protect the basement. That could be the main reason for not allowing public.

If you read the farman exchanges (actual archaelogical evidences that still exist) between raja jai singh and mughal court you will understand the transaction of land, how raja jai sing supplied marble for the construction etc. 

some example of restoration work released by ASI

Before

After

"Could be". These pictures show substantial modification of existing structure, both before and after. Again, unless they open it up for public, we wouldn't know. 

[kevinUsa]

3 hours ago, rational said:

there are archaeological evidence of temples destroyed by Mughal kings but this taj mahal is completely Mughal construction. ASI have proven in the supreme court time and time again, but every few years this fake story keeps popping up.

bihar elections unnayi kada 

[CanadianMalodu]

3 minutes ago, kevinUsa said:

bihar elections unnayi kada 

BJP on ground eelanti vishayallo em cheyyaru. Just election vunnapudu, pumpupah dialogues tappisthe.

[Junior_]

58 minutes ago, Android_Halwa said:

Forget about the facts, Mughal rulers built something like Taj Mahal ante I still won’t believe….their style of architecture is completely different and they are really bad at stone carvings…First time when I visited Taj, I literally spent the whole day admiring the architectural beauty of the structure…fine carvings, even quran verses which engraved in colored atones and embedded in the marble and that was such a fine piece of art and mughals were unable to create nothing even smaller or closer to Taj in their whole period.

Workers manolle, kattinchindhi vallu anukuntunna. I don’t know.

[rational]

1 hour ago, CanadianMalodu said:

"Could be". These pictures show substantial modification of existing structure, both before and after. Again, unless they open it up for public, we wouldn't know. 

 

Read the ASI report, of how the arched foundation is constructed to stabilize the upper structure, and similar foundational architecture is used in other tombs as well there is detailed report on mughal architecture of construction.  

it took more than a two decades for the construction, there is French traveler Jean Baptiste who wrote about this massive construction in detail in his accounts.

Also the  badhshanama (20 years of work) and financial records  are the archaeological evidences which give details about the yearly construction work. (how the land acquired, the payments received by craftsmen are also mentioned in the financial records) go through them first you will get an idea. 

Royal archives of Raj jai singh of  kachwaha dynasty (jaipur archives) the records are still available in the rajasthan state archives contain land transaction between him and Shajahan, supply of marble etc. 

Also study about the  deterioration happening to the foundations and courts orders about the restoration.

I agree there were lot temples that are destroyed and used for construction ( example you can find pre mughal indian architecture in Qutub minar) and ASI has reported about them too. But the same ASI reported that there werent any previous constructions below Taj mahal to court in 2017, 2022,2023 and these claims were false? 

there is an IIT rookie survey in 1993 on the structure and recent survey in 2021-22 and periodical inspections.

This is the data overs the Years from ASI if they found anything at least one member of the team would have likely reported or documented it.

[anna_gari_maata]

Can't comment on Taj Mahal but Qutub Minar is a clear remodelled structure based on hindu kingdom towers and there are clear temple pillars destroyed and revamed by muslims

[CanadianMalodu]

5 hours ago, rational said:

 

Read the ASI report, of how the arched foundation is constructed to stabilize the upper structure, and similar foundational architecture is used in other tombs as well there is detailed report on mughal architecture of construction.  

it took more than a two decades for the construction, there is French traveler Jean Baptiste who wrote about this massive construction in detail in his accounts.

Also the  badhshanama (20 years of work) and financial records  are the archaeological evidences which give details about the yearly construction work. (how the land acquired, the payments received by craftsmen are also mentioned in the financial records) go through them first you will get an idea. 

Royal archives of Raj jai singh of  kachwaha dynasty (jaipur archives) the records are still available in the rajasthan state archives contain land transaction between him and Shajahan, supply of marble etc. 

Also study about the  deterioration happening to the foundations and courts orders about the restoration.

I agree there were lot temples that are destroyed and used for construction ( example you can find pre mughal indian architecture in Qutub minar) and ASI has reported about them too. But the same ASI reported that there werent any previous constructions below Taj mahal to court in 2017, 2022,2023 and these claims were false? 

there is an IIT rookie survey in 1993 on the structure and recent survey in 2021-22 and periodical inspections.

This is the data overs the Years from ASI if they found anything at least one member of the team would have likely reported or documented it.

IIT survey is "NOT" archeological, so you don't need expect any evidence for that. I doubt if they ever had access to the restricted portions. 

Government agencies have tendency to coverup many things, that doesn't suit political interests. Again, whatever  photographs ASI released even the "before" rework ones show signs of substantial modification. Truth shall be uncovered only if public access is given to the restricted area.