Why BJP keeps winning elections

[11MohanRedddy]

58 minutes ago, Teluguredu said:

It clearly says han is based on cultural and linguistic similarities,I don't know what you are trying to prove.

Han people erased other ethnic groups, forcibly assimilated them to speak "their" language and follow "their" customs. If that is not killing other ethnicities, I don't know what else is. If you want to have the same language across India, you need to kill my language and culture. You cannot FORCE me to speak *** Tamil. 

[Teluguredu]

4 minutes ago, 11MohanRedddy said:

Han people erased other ethnic groups, forcibly assimilated them to speak "their" language and follow "their" customs. If that is not killing other ethnicities, I don't know what else is. If you want to have the same language across India, you need to kill my language and culture. You cannot FORCE me to speak *** Tamil. 

What is even han language lol that's the reason I saw you have zero knowledge of anything and just keep barking .

China as a state was united by qin state before 2000 years  ,there is no "han language" ,Han Dynasty was established by a general from chu state who had a territory along the names of han somthing after qin fell.

even before that everyone in warring states spoke the same language with different dialects because they were under zhou kingdom before 3000 years and they split into warring states and were united again by qin kingdom so they were the same race of people with minor differences.

 

[adavilo_baatasaari]

Xin Ping be like

"మన వామపక్ష సమితి Cantonese Languageన్నూ, Tibetan languageనున్నూ , Mangolian languageన్నూ,, మరిన్ని languagesన్నీ తొక్కేసి Mandarin promote చేస్తుంటే, ఎవడ్రా ఈ తెలుగు-లో-ఏడు గాడు, చరిత్ర బయటకి తీస్తున్నాడు."

 

మీరూ మీరూ కొట్టుకోండి, మమ్ములని involve చెయ్యకండి..

[Teluguredu]

3 minutes ago, adavilo_baatasaari said:

Xin Ping be like

"మన వామపక్ష సమితి Cantonese Languageన్నూ, Tibetan languageనున్నూ , Mangolian languageన్నూ,, మరిన్ని languagesన్నీ తొక్కేసి Mandarin promote చేస్తుంటే, ఎవడ్రా ఈ తెలుగు-లో-ఏడు గాడు, చరిత్ర బయటకి తీస్తున్నాడు."

 

మీరూ మీరూ కొట్టుకోండి, మమ్ములని involve చెయ్యకండి..

Cantonese is a dialect of chinese and cantonese speakers belong to han group.

Rest are all just small groups and migrants on borders with less than 1 crore population.

[adavilo_baatasaari]

I heard Cantonese is just a Political Dialect but not an actual Dialect. It is just second hand info. Yes they are Han though... 

Just like in India , some of the Northern languages were made as dialects to Hindi while they are not..

eg: Maithili ( from  Bihar ) was until recently treated as a dialect of Hindi while it is a different langauge.

[akkum_bakkum]

27 minutes ago, Teluguredu said:

What is even han language lol that's the reason I saw you have zero knowledge of anything and just keep barking .

China as a state was united by qin state before 2000 years  ,there is no "han language" ,Han Dynasty was established by a general from chu state who had a territory along the names of han somthing after qin fell.

even before that everyone in warring states spoke the same language with different dialects because they were under zhou kingdom before 3000 years and they split into warring states and were united again by qin kingdom so they were the same race of people with minor differences.

 

Em brand esavendi. Gattigane ekkuthundi. Thuppas discussions that yield nothing. thupuk on ur face. India has been one country and will continue to be one going forward forever. You can kiss ur mullah masters sleeper @$$ . Ohh, and btw India is your country too...unfortunately u have to live with this fact also, lol.

[11MohanRedddy]

2 hours ago, Teluguredu said:

What is even han language lol that's the reason I saw you have zero knowledge of anything and just keep barking .

China as a state was united by qin state before 2000 years  ,there is no "han language" ,Han Dynasty was established by a general from chu state who had a territory along the names of han somthing after qin fell.

even before that everyone in warring states spoke the same language with different dialects because they were under zhou kingdom before 3000 years and they split into warring states and were united again by qin kingdom so they were the same race of people with minor differences.

 

Wrong. Mandarin has been promoted as a standard, leading to its dominance and the decline of many other Chinese languages and dialects, such as Cantonese and Hokkien, which have survived due to their large speaker bases. Mandarin's promotion has led to the decline of many languages in China, including minority languages like Tibetan and Uyghur, and Han Chinese "dialects" like Cantonese, Wu, and Shanghainese. Even Mongolian was curbed by Mandarin domination. 

[Teluguredu]

13 hours ago, akkum_bakkum said:

Em brand esavendi. Gattigane ekkuthundi. Thuppas discussions that yield nothing. thupuk on ur face. India has been one country and will continue to be one going forward forever. You can kiss ur mullah masters sleeper @$$ . Ohh, and btw India is your country too...unfortunately u have to live with this fact also, lol.

India has never been a country before 1948.

[Teluguredu]

11 hours ago, 11MohanRedddy said:

Wrong. Mandarin has been promoted as a standard, leading to its dominance and the decline of many other Chinese languages and dialects, such as Cantonese and Hokkien, which have survived due to their large speaker bases. Mandarin's promotion has led to the decline of many languages in China, including minority languages like Tibetan and Uyghur, and Han Chinese "dialects" like Cantonese, Wu, and Shanghainese. Even Mongolian was curbed by Mandarin domination. 

What are you even talking lol there is no han language mandarin isn't "han" language ,mandarin is a sinitic langauge so is cantonese they are all dialects of chinese.

The idea of China itself is based on sinitic tribes ,rest are all considered as fringe groups and immigrants on border.

[11MohanRedddy]

5 minutes ago, Teluguredu said:

What are you even talking lol there is no han language mandarin isn't "han" language ,mandarin is a sinitic langauge so is cantonese they are all dialects of chinese.

The idea of China itself is based on sinitic tribes ,rest are all considered as fringe groups and immigrants on border.

https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20131215-how-china-portrays-its-minorities

Yeah right

[american_desi]

25 minutes ago, Teluguredu said:

India has never been a country before 1948.

Then what was Christopher Columbus looking for ? Pakistan?

 

The problem with you Turaka people is that there was never a country called Palestine in the history and you all become agitated when something happens there.

You chant Free Palestine when Arabs are the occupiers of Jewish lands. Even Quran doesn't mention Palestine (On the otherhand Quran mentioned Israel more than 20 times.) but it doesn't stop you .

Here in India you guys are upset that the Hindu people are united again .

The other official name of India is Bharat . guess where that name came from.?

India predates your 7th century religion 

Your attitude is no different from those educated Jihadist doctors in the Delhi Bomb Blast case 

[anna_gari_maata]

21 hours ago, Teluguredu said:

Some other idiot have asked the same thing to me before and I have replied multiple times.

U.s is a homogenous colonial country found by Britishers, rest of the ethnicities are just guests in the anglo country.although even the germans and dutch that have migrated to u.s are genetically close to Britishers still they have integrated into british culture.kind of like telugu people integrating with tamil culture.its more of white colonial country than anything.

Different religions ? U.s is 90% Christian ,rest of the people are just guests who are expected to keep their religion to their homes.

Although now it will slowly start failing after they keep getting away from their origins and act like everyone's culture is the same in that country ,this multiculturaliasm in Europe and u.s was pioneered by jews first cause or else they would always be seen as outsiders ,that's the reason many christians don't like them.

You can blabber whatever you want about religions infact christians themselves are not homogenous... the point is none of them are failed countries and far from becoming one. 

You conviniently ignored blacks and latinos claiming religion to cover up race ideology

[Teluguredu]

9 hours ago, 11MohanRedddy said:

https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20131215-how-china-portrays-its-minorities

Yeah right

Bbc lol do you want me to show you what bbc has said about chaiwala pm

[Teluguredu]

3 hours ago, anna_gari_maata said:

You can blabber whatever you want about religions infact christians themselves are not homogenous... the point is none of them are failed countries and far from becoming one. 

You conviniently ignored blacks and latinos claiming religion to cover up race ideology

There is something called gradient ,European christians are closer to one another than middle eastern or hindu people.

Blacks or any other race are guests in british established country ,all of the founding father's were British ,even if british people become a minority tomorrow it doesn't change the fact that America is a continuation of British colony found on their ideals and will continue speaking English ,once the people don't respect the founding father's and anglo origins of the country ,the country will become a shithole,it's not a shithole all fruit juice like brasil/southam countries,india,pakistan.

Latino is not a race.

 

[11MohanRedddy]

17 minutes ago, Teluguredu said:

Bbc lol do you want me to show you what bbc has said about chaiwala pm

How is that relevant