***Animal Fat - Facts and Misconceptions***

[Android_Halwa]

This NDDB test, was an informal test. Means, TTD did not officially mandate this test but this was more of an informal request made by Shyamal Rao as a TTD EO.

 

Here is the chronological order...

June 3rd 2024 : NDDB CHairman visits Tirumala, topic of dicsussion was not just about live stock but also the need to set up in house testign facilties.

Remember : Need for In House Julytesting facilities.

June 12th  2024 : A R Dairy starts Ghee supply

June 12th 2024 : Tankers start arriving

June 12th-July 2nd : Six tankers accepted, 4 were rejected.

July 7th - Sample collected

July 9th : Sample received by NDDB. 

July 13th : Analysis complete

July 16th 2024 : Report compiled.

 

[Marsmangalodu]

Are you saying that all samples tested were handed over or is it only nddb tested samples  but cbi testing was directly from rejected containers?. Other than animal fat what was the differenc between the reports

[vetri_psyconandamuri]

As usual yellow underwears will never dissappoint

[HowleFrookTeddy]

I’m writing a letter to UN and NATO on this 

[Android_Halwa]

Like I highlighted earlier, 

The samples were SENT to the NDDB but not collected by the NDDB.

https://x.com/murthyscribe/status/1836903492423966993/photo/1

The above link is the first page of the NDDB report in 2024. Under "Customer Provided Information" table, they clearly mention the details in the table.

Customer provided the sample, NOT COLLECTED by the NDDB.

[Android_Halwa]

7 minutes ago, Marsmangalodu said:

Are you saying that all samples tested were handed over or is it only nddb tested samples  but cbi testing was directly from rejected containers?. Other than animal fat what was the differenc between the reports

1. The sample tested by NDDB in 2024, is not collected by the NDDB but they only tested the sample they received. NDDB also made this clear in their report.

2. CBI collected the samples from rejected containers, sealed and tested them under their supervision.

The big question: How were the samples handled ? If they were not handled under standard conditions, there is a scope for varying results. or may be the samples were tampered with even before they were sent to the NDDB. 

In the initial arguments, NDDB already distanced itself from the report claiming they cannot vouch for the authenticity of the sample as they did not collect.

[idibezwada]

7 minutes ago, vetri_psyconandamuri said:

As usual yellow underwears will never dissappoint

vetri munjaki naa deevenalu...

[akkum_bakkum]

Nee davadalo propaganda pakkana pedithe....

Ghee adulteration is a fact. You are portraying as if using dairyless synthetic ghee is OK. Animal fat chances are less ani report vachindi. Adhi ghee ne kaadura ante animal fat ledantaav. Rejected tanks and nddb anevi nee manipulative agenda lo pawns. Aithe mari cbi fssai labs report thechinda. Endukai intha sodhi.

you have been barking animal fat like ur kula gajji for a long time and want to keep the topic alive. Report lo clear ga supettinaka kuda inka vaaguthune vuntav. The only thing CBN did in all this is hastily divulging animal fat statement basing on just the NDDB report. He shud've been more careful. But gheeless chemical vadina vaasthavanni completely ignoring. thoka langas ki pakka state politics ante entha interest ooo

Naa langa voodipodam thappu kaadu pakkinti pinnamma pakapaka navvutam thappu annadanta venakatiki nee lantidi.

[Android_Halwa]

NDDB in their report in 2024, clearly mentioned that they cannot vouch for the autnenticity of the sample.

Below is the NDDB Test report Page-3, Point-2, which clearly states NDDB is not responsible for verifying it in ALL CASES, Sample is not drawn by NDDB unless specified.

In the report, its clearly mentioned that sample was provided by the customer but not NDDB.

Also read Point-3.

[Marsmangalodu]

5 minutes ago, Android_Halwa said:

1. The sample tested by NDDB in 2024, is not collected by the NDDB but they only tested the sample they received. NDDB also made this clear in their report.

2. CBI collected the samples from rejected containers, sealed and tested them under their supervision.

The big question: How were the samples handled ? If they were not handled under standard conditions, there is a scope for varying results. or may be the samples were tampered with even before they were sent to the NDDB. 

In the initial arguments, NDDB already distanced itself from the report claiming they cannot vouch for the authenticity of the sample as they did not collect.

Lets assume nddb samples were tampered..cbi samples were collected from rejected containers..what was the result from that were they adultrated or not 

[Android_Halwa]

6 minutes ago, Marsmangalodu said:

Lets assume nddb samples were tampered..cbi samples were collected from rejected containers..what was the result from that were they adultrated or not 

Of course, they were adulterated. This is the whole reason why the tankers were  rejected by the TTD in the first place.

You take a sample from a tanker that was rejected for low quality, you get it tested, you get it tested again, and again and again, and the result will be the same.

NDDB never confirmed the presence of animal fat but only suspected, and CBI reiterated the same that no presence of animal fat but other adulterants like vegetable oil and palmolive oils.

[Android_Halwa]

14 minutes ago, akkum_bakkum said:

Nee davadalo propaganda pakkana pedithe....

Ghee adulteration is a fact. You are portraying as if using dairyless synthetic ghee is OK. Animal fat chances are less ani report vachindi. Adhi ghee ne kaadura ante animal fat ledantaav. Rejected tanks and nddb anevi nee manipulative agenda lo pawns. Aithe mari cbi fssai labs report thechinda. Endukai intha sodhi.

you have been barking animal fat like ur kula gajji for a long time and want to keep the topic alive. Report lo clear ga supettinaka kuda inka vaaguthune vuntav. The only thing CBN did in all this is hastily divulging animal fat statement basing on just the NDDB report. He shud've been more careful. But gheeless chemical vadina vaasthavanni completely ignoring. thoka langas ki pakka state politics ante entha interest ooo

Naa langa voodipodam thappu kaadu pakkinti pinnamma pakapaka navvutam thappu annadanta venakatiki nee lantidi.

Niku kuda mee leader laage tondarekkuva...

No report said anything or confirmed. Nee ooha prapancham gurinchi naak telvadu.

I  told you this is beyond political spectrum.

[Android_Halwa]

18 minutes ago, akkum_bakkum said:

Ghee adulteration is a fact.

Ghee adulteration is a known fact.

Malli okasari seputha vinu, Ghee adulteration is a KNOWN and RECORDED fact.

14 tankers were rejected between 2014-2019

18 tankers were rejected between 2019-2024

4 tankers were already rejected post 2024-till now.

What are you trying to claim here? We already know GHEE Is ADULTERATED. 

 

 

[akkum_bakkum]

25 minutes ago, Android_Halwa said:

Ghee adulteration is a known fact.

Malli okasari seputha vinu, Ghee adulteration is a KNOWN and RECORDED fact.

14 tankers were rejected between 2014-2019

18 tankers were rejected between 2019-2024

4 tankers were already rejected post 2024-till now.

What are you trying to claim here? We already know GHEE Is ADULTERATED. 

 

 

nee yenkamma....68 lakh liters of gheeless ghee supplied between 19-24 ante antha volume 18 tankers lo padthada. An average mid sized tanker can carry 4-6k liters, not lakhs of liters.

[Marsmangalodu]

12 minutes ago, Android_Halwa said:

Of course, they were adulterated. This is the whole reason why the tankers were  rejected by the TTD in the first place.

You take a sample from a tanker that was rejected for low quality, you get it tested, you get it tested again, and again and again, and the result will be the same.

NDDB never confirmed the presence of animal fat but only suspected, and CBI reiterated the same that no presence of animal fat but other adulterants like vegetable oil and palmolive oils.

Just adultration is enough for any hindu to take this seriously whether there is animal fat or not is secondary this combined with parakamani scam shows what jaggai did with ttd with christians like bhumana and subba reddy