dkc Posted May 16, 2014 Author Report Posted May 16, 2014 caste based reservation ki ela support chestaru... So you are saying "high income" vache "Lower caste" reservations ki eligible... and "low income" vache "upper caste" reservations ki not eligible? Na poorthi maddatu "income based" reservation ki.. Andariki equal opportunities vachedi ilane... daniki caste ki relation undakoodadu... lYou mistake the entire idea of reservation. high income earning lower caste ki reservation undaala ledha ane decision should be left to that caste/caste group which is availing the reservation. let them decide. Its funny when upper castes who have no reservation try to poke their nose into who should get reservation in a particular caste. inka, low income earning upper caste antaava, they should never get reservation.
donganaaK Posted May 16, 2014 Report Posted May 16, 2014 They have the resources to run away from the country. lower castes would kill for that kind of privilege. Lets educate the lower castes, and enrich them so they can also run away from the country. then upper castes can come back and serve their country with patriotism. dude every post of yours shows how insecure you are in your real life , being short and dark is not your fault , just get over with it in some other way , if you think being a keyboard warrior helps you in anyway then go on , i'll help u lolol
paampachak Posted May 16, 2014 Report Posted May 16, 2014 dude dont discuss with this moron he don't know anything about present India, he read book about India 10 yrs back and thinking like that. He is older than congress, just ignore
dkc Posted May 16, 2014 Author Report Posted May 16, 2014 They are not running away for enjoying life FYI evadiki antha doola ledu.. If the Rich runs away because they got resources, US citizens would have been the world's largest immigrating community ... how dumb you are ? where would this rich US citizen immigrate to? enlighten me, pls. do you even read what you type?
donganaaK Posted May 16, 2014 Report Posted May 16, 2014 dude dont discuss with this moron he don't know anything about present India, he read book about India 10 yrs back and thinking like that. He is older than congress, just ignore he's just an insecure little prick , he thinks he can go arnd bullying ppl with that bigoted vocabulary of his lol
dkc Posted May 16, 2014 Author Report Posted May 16, 2014 lets suppose i cant , i guess the'd be still be way better than yours lol I'm not the one who calls others incompetent fools, because they stole my cake.
donganaaK Posted May 16, 2014 Report Posted May 16, 2014 where would this rich US citizen immigrate to? enlighten me, pls. do you even read what you type? lol you are a living proof that foolishness has no bounds
donganaaK Posted May 16, 2014 Report Posted May 16, 2014 I'm not the one who calls others incompetent fools, because they stole my cake. yeah but you are still an insecure little prick ,, let me guess , 5feet4inches tall at the max ? am i right ? lol
dkc Posted May 16, 2014 Author Report Posted May 16, 2014 TS ki oka chinna question baa. nee thread lo clarity missing bhayya, ippudu unna india does not need development ana nee udesham? development kante, law and order, policy consistency, labour issues, ivi resolve chesthe better growth untundhi ani uddesam. Its better to build infra based on demand, than build stuff in anticipation of future use. plus, India has decent basic infra. This is not the 90s. development of infra can be second priority antunna.
krisomania2043 Posted May 16, 2014 Report Posted May 16, 2014 I'm not the one who calls others incompetent fools, because they stole my cake. bhayya i asked you question, do you think that india is 1. Developed country - so we do need anymore development 2. developing country - so we need some dvelopment 3. Underdeveloped country- we need more development
donganaaK Posted May 16, 2014 Report Posted May 16, 2014 development kante, law and order, policy consistency, labour issues, ivi resolve chesthe better growth untundhi ani uddesam. Its better to build infra based on demand, than build stuff in anticipation of future use. plus, India has decent basic infra. This is not the 90s. development of infra can be second priority antunna. take a look at gujarat and talk , ppl are expecting the same on a larger scale ..... enough with your stupid arguments nw
dkc Posted May 16, 2014 Author Report Posted May 16, 2014 dude every post of yours shows how insecure you are in your real life , being short and dark is not your fault , just get over with in some other way , if you think being a keyboard warrior helps you in anyway then go on , i'll help u lolol I'm not dark. your security and stupidity shines through all your posts, sure man.
krisomania2043 Posted May 16, 2014 Report Posted May 16, 2014 development kante, law and order, policy consistency, labour issues, ivi resolve chesthe better growth untundhi ani uddesam. Its better to build infra based on demand, than build stuff in anticipation of future use. plus, India has decent basic infra. This is not the 90s. development of infra can be second priority antunna. Ivannai better ga jaragali ante we need economy brother, and economy can only be genarted when there is infrastructure and inverstment. PS: You cant pluck money out from trees.
porsche911 Posted May 16, 2014 Report Posted May 16, 2014 infra is easy to overcome compared to the other bigger issues like, corruption, high unemployment rate, large income gap between poor and rich.... industrialization, using e-governance to achieve transparency in governance, effective laws regarding corruption are the solutions i could think of.....
Recommended Posts