Tadika Posted July 30, 2015 Author Report Posted July 30, 2015 kanee ee loafer gadu involved ani andariki telusu. Veedini irikinchadaniki motives emi levu G.O.I. ki. Government ki emi ledhu but court lo judges ki mind lo impression padipoyuntadhi ga ba veedu blast case lo involved bhaytaki rakudadhu ani
dotnetrockz Posted July 30, 2015 Report Posted July 30, 2015 Person wrong aa right aa kadhu ba point person adhe point adhe baa..paina post chesaru chudu news article "pleaded guilty " ani.....vadini balavanthnga nettaru antava baa....asalu proofs lekunda?adhi baa nenu adigedhi nuvvu avvi consider cheyyatle...just vadu muslim or vadu vadi tammudi kadha vadiki em sambandham ani antunnavu........law prakaram konni cases lo conspiracy to commit murder ki ekkuva siksha paduthundhi telusa baa neeku.......
Tadika Posted July 30, 2015 Author Report Posted July 30, 2015 adhe baa..paina post chesaru chudu news article "pleaded guilty " ani.....vadini balavanthnga nettaru antava baa....asalu proofs lekunda?adhi baa nenu adigedhi nuvvu avvi consider cheyyatle...just vadu muslim or vadu vadi tammudi kadha vadiki em sambandham ani antunnavu........law prakaram konni cases lo conspiracy to commit murder ki ekkuva siksha paduthundhi telusa baa neeku....... Theleedhu ba
SUBBARAVU Posted July 30, 2015 Report Posted July 30, 2015 Government ki emi ledhu but court lo judges ki mind lo impression padipoyuntadhi ga ba veedu blast case lo involved bhaytaki rakudadhu ani I agree with this point but his case was heard numerous times. Usually judges think objectively based on evidence presented by both accusers lawyer and prosecutor, instead of emotional decisions. The convict can appeal make that argument that there was prejudice in the judgement and transfer to another court (like in Jayalalitha's case). In this case he appealed many times from starting of the trail to now. So we have to assume that whole system is against the person. The opposition to death penalty is mainly to avoid executing an innocent person hastily (like one case happened in Texas). If there is a chance that there will be more DNA evidence or other material likely to be discovered in future.
Tadika Posted July 30, 2015 Author Report Posted July 30, 2015 I agree with this point but his case was heard numerous times. Usually judges think objectively based on evidence presented by both accusers lawyer and prosecutor, instead of emotional decisions. The convict can appeal make that argument that there was prejudice in the judgement and transfer to another court (like in Jayalalitha's case). In this case he appealed many times from starting of the trail to now. So we have to assume that whole system is against the person. The opposition to death penalty is mainly to avoid executing an innocent person hastily (like one case happened in Texas). If there is a chance that there will be more DNA evidence or other material likely to be discovered in future. Sagame arhamayndhi ba Telugu lo cheppu konchem
SUBBARAVU Posted July 30, 2015 Report Posted July 30, 2015 Sagame arhamayndhi ba Telugu lo cheppu konchem em ledhu... judges maamulu manushulaga emotional kadhu ani.. sakshalu chustharu.. athanu appeal chesukunnadu...judges meedha nammakam leka pothe court marchukovacchu.. 20 years undi appeal meedha appeal chesadu.. so mottham system kummakayithe thappa siksha correct anukovali..
Tadika Posted July 30, 2015 Author Report Posted July 30, 2015 em ledhu... judges maamulu manushulaga emotional kadhu ani.. sakshalu chustharu.. athanu appeal chesukunnadu...judges meedha nammakam leka pothe court marchukovacchu.. 20 years undi appeal meedha appeal chesadu.. so mottham system kummakayithe thappa siksha correct anukovali.. Hmm
Tadika Posted July 30, 2015 Author Report Posted July 30, 2015 Ippude ma colleague okaru chepparu Veedidhi direct involvement lekunna indirect ga unna chala teevramaina desha droham case idhi anti nation case idhi ilantollani inthakalam unchatame ekkuva ani
alpachinao Posted July 30, 2015 Report Posted July 30, 2015 Ippude ma colleague okaru chepparu Veedidhi direct involvement lekunna indirect ga unna chala teevramaina desha droham case idhi anti nation case idhi ilantollani inthakalam unchatame ekkuva ani simple logic man oka ammai ni rape chesthuna oka ammai defend cheyanikunda kalu chethulu katadaniki shayam chessi vellipoyadu so he deserve same as rapist... so he is only indirect involvement he must have less punsihment tell me what he deserves?
Tadika Posted July 30, 2015 Author Report Posted July 30, 2015 simple logic man oka ammai ni rape chesthuna oka ammai defend cheyanikunda kalu chethulu katadaniki shayam chessi vellipoyadu so he deserve same as rapist... so he is only indirect involvement he must have less punsihment tell me what he deserves? Anthe Anthe mukkalu mukkaluga narakali ilantollani
KillChillPandey Posted July 30, 2015 Report Posted July 30, 2015 Ippude ma colleague okaru chepparu Veedidhi direct involvement lekunna indirect ga unna chala teevramaina desha droham case idhi anti nation case idhi ilantollani inthakalam unchatame ekkuva ani true that..
athletics Posted July 30, 2015 Report Posted July 30, 2015 he is a crook and deserves punishment. But the way Indian government got him and promised to lessen his punishment if he cooperated is questionable.
Tadika Posted July 30, 2015 Author Report Posted July 30, 2015 true that.. Law chadhivadu ma colleague
Recommended Posts