Jump to content

Ee Yakub Memen Story Enti?


Tadika

Recommended Posts

kanee ee loafer gadu involved ani andariki telusu. Veedini irikinchadaniki motives emi levu G.O.I. ki.

Government ki emi ledhu but court lo judges ki mind lo impression padipoyuntadhi ga ba veedu blast case lo involved bhaytaki rakudadhu ani
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Tadika

    26

  • SUBBARAVU

    9

  • dotnetrockz

    8

  • KillChillPandey

    6

Top Posters In This Topic

Person wrong aa right aa kadhu ba point person adhe point

adhe baa..paina post chesaru chudu news article "pleaded guilty " ani.....vadini balavanthnga nettaru antava baa....asalu proofs lekunda?adhi baa nenu adigedhi nuvvu avvi consider cheyyatle...just vadu muslim or vadu vadi tammudi kadha vadiki em sambandham ani antunnavu........law prakaram konni cases lo conspiracy to commit murder ki ekkuva siksha paduthundhi telusa baa neeku.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

adhe baa..paina post chesaru chudu news article "pleaded guilty " ani.....vadini balavanthnga nettaru antava baa....asalu proofs lekunda?adhi baa nenu adigedhi nuvvu avvi consider cheyyatle...just vadu muslim or vadu vadi tammudi kadha vadiki em sambandham ani antunnavu........law prakaram konni cases lo conspiracy to commit murder ki ekkuva siksha paduthundhi telusa baa neeku.......

Theleedhu ba
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Government ki emi ledhu but court lo judges ki mind lo impression padipoyuntadhi ga ba veedu blast case lo involved bhaytaki rakudadhu ani

 

I agree with this point but his case was heard numerous times. Usually judges think objectively based on evidence presented by both accusers lawyer and prosecutor,  instead of emotional decisions. The convict can appeal make that argument that there was prejudice in the judgement and transfer to another court (like in Jayalalitha's case). In this case he appealed many times from starting of the trail to now. So we have to assume that whole system is against the person. 

 

The opposition to death penalty is mainly to avoid executing an innocent person hastily (like one case happened in Texas). If there is a chance that there will be more DNA evidence or other material likely to be discovered in future. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with this point but his case was heard numerous times. Usually judges think objectively based on evidence presented by both accusers lawyer and prosecutor, instead of emotional decisions. The convict can appeal make that argument that there was prejudice in the judgement and transfer to another court (like in Jayalalitha's case). In this case he appealed many times from starting of the trail to now. So we have to assume that whole system is against the person.

The opposition to death penalty is mainly to avoid executing an innocent person hastily (like one case happened in Texas). If there is a chance that there will be more DNA evidence or other material likely to be discovered in future.

Sagame arhamayndhi ba Telugu lo cheppu konchem
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sagame arhamayndhi ba Telugu lo cheppu konchem

em ledhu... judges maamulu manushulaga emotional kadhu ani.. sakshalu chustharu.. athanu appeal chesukunnadu...judges meedha nammakam leka pothe court marchukovacchu.. 20 years undi appeal meedha appeal chesadu.. so mottham system kummakayithe thappa siksha correct anukovali..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

em ledhu... judges maamulu manushulaga emotional kadhu ani.. sakshalu chustharu.. athanu appeal chesukunnadu...judges meedha nammakam leka pothe court marchukovacchu.. 20 years undi appeal meedha appeal chesadu.. so mottham system kummakayithe thappa siksha correct anukovali..

Hmm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ippude ma colleague okaru chepparu
Veedidhi direct involvement lekunna indirect ga unna chala teevramaina desha droham case idhi anti nation case idhi ilantollani inthakalam unchatame ekkuva ani

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ippude ma colleague okaru chepparu
Veedidhi direct involvement lekunna indirect ga unna chala teevramaina desha droham case idhi anti nation case idhi ilantollani inthakalam unchatame ekkuva ani

 

simple logic man oka ammai ni rape chesthuna oka ammai defend cheyanikunda kalu chethulu katadaniki shayam chessi vellipoyadu so he deserve same as rapist...

so he is only indirect involvement he must have less punsihment

tell me what he deserves?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

simple logic man oka ammai ni rape chesthuna oka ammai defend cheyanikunda kalu chethulu katadaniki shayam chessi vellipoyadu so he deserve same as rapist...
so he is only indirect involvement he must have less punsihment
tell me what he deserves?

Anthe Anthe mukkalu mukkaluga narakali ilantollani
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ippude ma colleague okaru chepparu
Veedidhi direct involvement lekunna indirect ga unna chala teevramaina desha droham case idhi anti nation case idhi ilantollani inthakalam unchatame ekkuva ani

 

true that..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

he is a crook and deserves punishment.

But the way Indian government got him and promised to lessen his punishment if he cooperated is questionable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...