Piscop Posted August 13, 2015 Report Posted August 13, 2015 nu gattiga anamaku..all H1 vuncles will come and bash u like anything.. But nu cheppina daniki nen aithe support chestha ..LOL na situation lo unte ardam avthadi baa. monna college ki poi vostha unte flight lo same school papa okathi tagilindi.. matallo naadi 3rd masters ani ante.. avuna.. naku already h1 vochesindi .. inko 2 sems migili unnai anta
dollar vora Posted August 13, 2015 Report Posted August 13, 2015 nu gattiga anamaku..all H1 vuncles will come and bash u like anything.. But nu cheppina daniki nen aithe support chestha ..LOL Yes mein bhi support kartha hoon
Roger_that Posted August 13, 2015 Report Posted August 13, 2015 Jai mavni or canada deeni kanna cpt continuing best emo
gandhi Posted August 13, 2015 Report Posted August 13, 2015 Asalu 1st 6 yrs annaru kada..endo ee vidhi vaiparithyam adhe kada..if this news is thru then F1 ollaki jatare.... inka h1 emo 500k applications vastayi emooo next yr
dollar vora Posted August 13, 2015 Report Posted August 13, 2015 na situation lo unte ardam avthadi baa. monna college ki poi vostha unte flight lo same school papa okathi tagilindi.. matallo naadi 3rd masters ani ante.. avuna.. naku already h1 vochesindi .. inko 2 sems migili unnai anta Chi dabemma
LungiLingaraju Posted August 13, 2015 Report Posted August 13, 2015 seems not a reliable source http://immigration-law.com Indulo link esadu court di chudu
dollar vora Posted August 13, 2015 Report Posted August 13, 2015 deeni kanna cpt continuing best emo Job pothe addukku thinali
sqladdict Posted August 13, 2015 Report Posted August 13, 2015 before packing need 1 last plate bajji mixture urgentair india return flight loo hostess serve chestadi..
Piscop Posted August 13, 2015 Report Posted August 13, 2015 adhe kada..if this news is thru then F1 ollaki jatare.... inka h1 emo 500k applications vastayi emooo next yr adi mootha mossi nada?
ronitreddy Posted August 13, 2015 Report Posted August 13, 2015 seems not a reliable source Is it not from the USCIS website?
gandhi Posted August 13, 2015 Report Posted August 13, 2015 adi mootha mossi nada? prepare for the worst nai chandra babu eppudo chepindu kada mayya.. anduke telling ......
gandhi Posted August 13, 2015 Report Posted August 13, 2015 http://immigration-law.com Indulo link esadu court di chudu this is very reliable website
ronitreddy Posted August 13, 2015 Report Posted August 13, 2015 na situation lo unte ardam avthadi baa. monna college ki poi vostha unte flight lo same school papa okathi tagilindi.. matallo naadi 3rd masters ani ante.. avuna.. naku already h1 vochesindi .. inko 2 sems migili unnai anta LMAO..ela H4 aa
dappusubhani Posted August 13, 2015 Report Posted August 13, 2015 ippudu maa sister usa ki vasthe enti parisithi :3D_Smiles_38: :3D_Smiles_38: annayya lu undedi deniki vaay @3$%
Silver_mani Posted August 13, 2015 Report Posted August 13, 2015 STEM OPT Extension Regulation Needs Notice, Comment: WashTech v. DHS - Law360 Law360, Apr. 12, 2015 - "A D.C. federal judge on Wednesday said a 2008 Department of Homeland Security rule that allows certain F-1 visa students with math and science-related degrees to have an additional 17 months of training in the U.S. is deficient because it wasn't subjected to public notice and comment, but she allowed it to stay in place temporarily.U.S. District Judge Ellen Segal Huvelle rejected the DHS' argument that The Washington Alliance of Technology Workers, which challenged the rule, lacks “zone of interest” standing, and she found that the agency had failed to carry its burden to show it faced an emergency situation that exempted it from subjecting the 2008 rule to notice and comment, saying failure to provide it was a serious procedural deficiency that weighed in favor of vacating the rule on remand.The judge did, however, note that an immediate vacatur of the rule would be “seriously disruptive” and stayed the vacatur until Feb. 12, 2016, during which time DHS can submit the rule for proper notice and comment, she said.The DHS estimated in 2008 that there were about 70,000 F-1 visa students on optional practical training, or OPT, and that one-third had earned degrees in a science, technology, engineering and math, or STEM, field, according to Judge Huvelle. And while the agency had not disclosed the current number of immigrants taking advantage of the extension, she had no doubt that vacating the rule would force “thousands of foreign students with work authorizations to scramble” to leave the country, she added, citing DHS’ opposition brief.“The court sees no way of immediately restoring the pre-2008 status quo without causing substantial hardship for foreign students and a major labor disruption for the technology sector,” the judge said. “As such, the court will order that the 2008 Rule — and its subsequent amendments — be vacated, but it will order that the vacatur be stayed.”Judge Huvelle did, however, disagree with the union’s argument there was not enough evidence to show that Congress was aware of DHS’ interpretation of F-1, saying in light of Congress’ broad delegation of authority to the agency to regulate the duration of a nonimmigrant’s stay and Congress’ acquiescence in DHS’ long-standing reading of F-1, the DHS’ interpretation was not unreasonable.WashTech's complaint claims that the 2008 OPT rule exceeded the DHS’ statutory authority and that the rule was implemented arbitrarily and capriciously. The union, which sought to void the 2008 rule, claims the OPT regulations were created to go around the caps on H-1B visas by allowing foreign STEM workers who might be denied an H-1B to work through an F-1 visa instead.In November, Judge Huvelle threw out WashTech’s challenge against the 12-month OPT program as it existed before 2008, but she kept alive the union's challenge to the 17-month extension for STEM students.Both sides had moved for judgment on various claims, with WashTech seeking to ax the 2008 OPT rule, arguing that the department's OPT rule-making is “an administrative process run amok.” The judge granted in part and denied in part on Wednesday the summary judgment bids of both parties. The DHS, however, has argued that it had good cause to publish the regulation as an emergency rule because of an urgent situation wherein thousands of highly skilled individuals educated at U.S. colleges and universities would otherwise have been forced to leave this country.Further, the 2008 rule reasonably interpreted the “broad statutory terms” undergirding the foreign student program, the DHS said.The plaintiff is represented by John M. Miano, Dale L. Wilcox and Michael M. Hethmon of the Immigration Reform Law Institute.The government is represented by Benjamin C. Mizer, Leon Fresco and Geoffrey Forney of the U.S. Department of Justice.The case is Washington Alliance of Technology Workers v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, case number 1:14-cv-00529, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia." - See more at: http://www.lexisnexis.com/legalnewsroom/immigration/b/newsheadlines/archive/2015/08/13/stem-opt-extension-regulation-needs-notice-comment-washtech-v-dhs-law360.aspx#sthash.mykijiWB.dpuf What does that mean ?
Recommended Posts