babruvahana Posted March 6, 2016 Author Report Posted March 6, 2016 Nee enki anallll aa Indhakati nundi ginjukuntunna endhra adhi ani lol Back hole vayya
Enjoy99 Posted March 6, 2016 Report Posted March 6, 2016 Babu ismailu nuvvu virgin ve kadha ?? :giggle:
arshad Posted March 6, 2016 Report Posted March 6, 2016 Nee enki anallll aa Indhakati nundi ginjukuntunna endhra adhi ani lol nuvvu nee aathram
Enjoy99 Posted March 6, 2016 Report Posted March 6, 2016 Back hole vayya Anul anul ante endha anukunna le ..
babruvahana Posted March 6, 2016 Author Report Posted March 6, 2016 Aa broker gadu Inka.touch lo ne unnadu bava ki Ma idhariki time dhorakatla .. Leka pothe e paatiki :giggle: Anul chances very lessa?
Enjoy99 Posted March 6, 2016 Report Posted March 6, 2016 Anul chances very lessa? Malli adhe maata Aa pedhhayana cheppadu ga 0.25% chances ani
babruvahana Posted March 6, 2016 Author Report Posted March 6, 2016 Babu ismailu nuvvu virgin ve kadha ?? :giggle: Pakka atyundady
babruvahana Posted March 6, 2016 Author Report Posted March 6, 2016 Malli adhe maata Aa pedhhayana cheppadu ga 0.25% chances ani Bayam vayya.. Vyadhi bhayam
reggiebush Posted March 6, 2016 Report Posted March 6, 2016 Anul chances very lessa? When it comes to calculating risk of HIV transmission, some people can really get fixated on specific percentages. That's not something to condone. But it's still interesting -- and useful -- when studies use those percentages to shed new light on key topics in HIV transmission. Which is what a group of British researchers did recently for the age-old question: When it comes to HIV/AIDS, how much riskier is anal sex than vaginal sex? Researchers from Imperial College and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine did a meta-analysis of 16 studies related to HIV risk during unprotected anal sex. Most of the studies involved gay or bisexual men. (Our friends at NAM recently summarized the findings in detail.) They estimated that HIV transmission risk during a single act of unprotected, receptive anal sex may be 18 times higher than unprotected, receptive vaginal sex: 1.4 percent compared to 0.08 percent. The estimated risk for unprotected, insertive anal sex was, as expected, found to be lower (0.62 percent) than for receptive anal sex -- and lower still if the man is circumcised (0.11 percent). Still, the risk percentages are all higher for anal sex than vaginal sex, which is in line with earlier study findings.
ipaddress0 Posted March 6, 2016 Report Posted March 6, 2016 mayya okka suggestion ... Pelli chesukoni endo... Mee wife ki vere sambandam susi pelli sey.. nek HIV confirm ga osthadi... nuv appud lanja hole em karma kukka hole la bhi petti dengoch dengay madarchood badkaav :giggle: arey badkaav thread lepey mani mod ki pm sey... lekapothey neeku AIDS vachi sathav :giggle:
chandra916 Posted March 6, 2016 Report Posted March 6, 2016 Endhayya intlo wife vundi kuda entayya ee panulu...2 families suffer avuthayi kadha emina aithe
reggiebush Posted March 6, 2016 Report Posted March 6, 2016 actual ga menu posts veyyanu... only thing i am actively sending you comments is... u are not at risk... i don't want you to suffer... ma relative kuda inthe mental tension tho chachadu.. 1 yr ee pani chesevadu kadu alane padukune vadu results vachaka picha happy. mind is devil don't make it think... nee life gulla gulla ayipoyidi.. lenivi kuda unnatu anipisthadi... u are just fine... relax
arshad Posted March 6, 2016 Report Posted March 6, 2016 Babu ismailu nuvvu virgin ve kadha ?? @3$% 5 years kritam
arshad Posted March 6, 2016 Report Posted March 6, 2016 Endhayya intlo wife vundi kuda entayya ee panulu...2 families suffer avuthayi kadha emina aithe
25
Recommended Posts