Hrithik Tells All to Arnab | Full Interview

[uttermost]

2 minutes ago, tennisluvr said:

Yes and went on to make it public in an interview calling him a "silly ex". 

She perhaps didn't expect the backlash knowing that Hrithik is a soft target, or perhaps wanted to have this backlash to get her share of die hard fanatics. 

So calling someone a "silly ex" is reason enough to use your friends to create a perception that the woman is mad? hehe..

I don't understand this level of touchiness by Hrithik.

[uttermost]

4 minutes ago, tennisluvr said:

Yes and went on to make it public in an interview calling him a "silly ex". 

She perhaps didn't expect the backlash knowing that Hrithik is a soft target, or perhaps wanted to have this backlash to get her share of die hard fanatics. 

According to her version, it was she who dumped him, because he couldn't chose between her and his wife. So I understand the "silly ex" comment.

[tennisluvr]

Just now, uttermost said:

So calling someone a "silly ex" is reason enough to use your friends to create a perception that the woman is mad? hehe..

I don't understand this level of touchiness by Hrithik.

If his version is correct where he says he was never her "ex" everything he had done makes total sense. 

[uttermost]

1 minute ago, tennisluvr said:

If his version is correct where he says he was never her "ex" everything he had done makes total sense. 

If and only If. 

Either way Hrithik got too desperate and shared emails she allegedly sent, two years after his complaint that she's stalking him.

He simply added another level of complexity to an already silly saga. I trust only people with something to hide will do it. 

[siru]

10 minutes ago, uttermost said:

According to her, she's moved on long back, and Hrithik lingered on for a while, hacking her email account, and sending emails from it to his own account to prepare a 1000+ long list of emails to release recently.

The complaint against Hrithik from her was simple. He hacked her emails (more like her email was hacked). There was a counter complaint that Kangana is stalking him. 

Kangana doesn't have to prove her claim, because she only named him as a possible suspect in the hack, and Hrithik seems to have made up a story of some hacker somewhere who possibly sent all those mails. But the story didn't seem to add up in police investigation. (All this from her interview)

Hrithik's complaint that Kangana is stalking him couldn't also be proved. 

So who started all this? I'd say Hrithik started it by being an asshole to Kangana  

haha..by the looks, hrithik doesnt look like the guy capable of hacking emails..unless kangana gave him password or logged in his device and forgot...

both are attractive ppl capable of getting anyone...all this is unnecessary imo

 

[uttermost]

1 minute ago, siru said:

haha..by the looks, hrithik doesnt look like the guy capable of hacking emails..unless kangana gave him password or logged in his device and forgot...

both are attractive ppl capable of getting anyone...all this is unnecessary imo

 

Yes. She said that shared her passwd. His mistake was that he used that account to implicate Kangana (according to her).

All this is absolutely silly. That's why its so much fun talking about it.

[siru]

1 minute ago, uttermost said:

If and only If. 

Either way Hrithik got too desperate and shared emails she allegedly sent, two years after his complaint that she's stalking him.

He simply added another level of complexity to an already silly saga. I trust only people with something to hide will do it. 

doesnt indian courts have enough cases to deal with..

what will either parties get out of this? do theye xpect court to decide whos at fault for breakup lol

[uttermost]

Just now, siru said:

doesnt indian courts have enough cases to deal with..

what will either parties get out of this? do theye xpect court to decide whos at fault for breakup lol

This case won't go to court. It will remain in Lok ki Adalat  

Something for us to talk about.

[pirangi]

4 hours ago, uttermost said:

4 hours ago, uttermost said:

Dear Hrithik,

So, you had an affair with a starlet. big deal. say this out aloud in all interviews. "Yes! I had an affair with Kangana, but it didn't work out and now we've gone our own ways". Matter over.

what can she do? She'll joke about you in a few movie releases, and everybody will be bored of it after a while.

but what the fcuk are you doing, giving interview to Arnab?  

The truth is often pointless.

The side that has something to hide is probably the culprit. Its after all a simple issue. 

Its not like someone's claiming that he molested her or anything. She claims that he hacked her email address, and he responds with bullshit after 2yrs of the complaint, while filing his own complaint in the meanwhile.

What does Hrithik have to hide? His image? haha...

Nobody would care if he admitted that he did have an affair with Kangana. And for her part, she's playing it like a queen, forcing him to come out of his comfort zone among his friends and chamchas.

its awesome. Kangana is a brave woman.

[siru]

1 minute ago, uttermost said:

This case won't go to court. It will remain in Lok ki Adalat  

Something for us to talk about.

haha true..something to talk until the next big thing 

[uttermost]

2 minutes ago, pirangi said:

There's no contradiction. Hrithik bullied Kangana with his filmi friends, and Kangana responded publicly.

Hrithik coming to the public now is a desperate move.

[uttermost]

3 minutes ago, pirangi said:

Kangana admitted to the affair. Hrithik instead of admitting it, is trying to dodge it through an interview.

He did it inspite of the safe space that is bollywood for him. He won't be affected even a bit by this controversy professionally. So only a desperate crybaby will seek public opinion like Hrithik tried to.

A smart alpha male would have brushed aside the entire thing like its nothing.

[Android_Halwa]

2 hours ago, uttermost said:

Lol. sure.

Halwa likes to chase imaginary enemies so that he can fulfill his daily fight quota.

In reality, he probably believes in nothing. And is probably one of the most flexible candidates on this db, who'll agree with anything, as long as the majority (or whatever majority in his mind is) agrees to it.

Halwa is just a majoritarian bully. Nothing more. Don't mind him.

Ohh..! I didn't knew I was a majoritarian bully untill a moment back...

How do you exactly define a majoritarian bully ? someone who agree with anything ? I don't think I have a past like that, atleats in DB where I agreed with many you all, Is that what you call majoritarian ? Then yeah, I'm majoritarian.

I believe in nothing, yeah neither kangana nor hrithik...I don't believe in both of them...neither I take stand like you do buddy...

Anyway, coming to the point...I don't care who kangana is and what hrithik did to Kangana...

My point is, How can people here in this DB or especially so called 'feminists' support Kangana listening to one side of the story ?

Did you get my point ? Who is right or who is wrong, its not for me to decide...I don't know if even you have that capacity to do so or not but I don't even care...the only point is, how can someone judge by listening to one side of the story ? 

Let me re-run again...How can someone judge by listening to one side of the story...

You can run your judgement all day long, Its looks you just graduated from being a believer in three leg philosophy to a forensic expert as well as legal terminology expert...Good going, You just announced your entry with a bang....but I smell it the same way as it used to be..

[uttermost]

1 minute ago, Android_Halwa said:

Ohh..! I didn't knew I was a majoritarian bully untill a moment back...

How do you exactly define a majoritarian bully ? someone who agree with anything ? I don't think I have a past like that, atleats in DB where I agreed with many you all, Is that what you call majoritarian ? Then yeah, I'm majoritarian.

I believe in nothing, yeah neither kangana nor hrithik...I don't believe in both of them...neither I take stand like you do buddy...

Anyway, coming to the point...I don't care who kangana is and what hrithik did to Kangana...

My point is, How can people here in this DB or especially so called 'feminists' support Kangana listening to one side of the story ?

Did you get my point ? Who is right or who is wrong, its not for me to decide...I don't know if even you have that capacity to do so or not but I don't even care...the only point is, how can someone judge by listening to one side of the story ? 

Let me re-run again...How can someone judge by listening to one side of the story...

You can run your judgement all day long, Its looks you just graduated from being a believer in three leg philosophy to a forensic expert as well as legal terminology expert...Good going, You just announced your entry with a bang....but I smell it the same way as it used to be..

Get this into your head. THERE ARE NO FEMINISTS IN THIS DB.

 

 

[Android_Halwa]

And to support your silly claims, there is a useless life wandering around here trying to make a self goal out of a useless and brainless life..

Great team..and it will only increase your stupidity levels by two folds buddy...I have tremendous respect for you, but wandering around lifeless will make you look desperate and cheaper ...