Google Vs Oracle 8.8 billion legal battle

[JavaBava]

Nee yavva asalu case ento kuda telvada ... java is open source ..free to use but the runtime should never be changed as per the terms and conditions.. And all java implementations should always support the java api as soecufied by SUN at the minimum. Anyone who uses it should never change   the bytecode format which will nullify multiplatform advantage of java. Android violates by generating bytecode structure which will not run on any other jvm except dalvik.Android though is a java implementation partially implements the java standard in its own way.  Google knows from day one that this is a violation of terms. 

[Demigod]

5 minutes ago, JavaBava said:

Nee yavva asalu case ento kuda telvada ... java is open source ..free to use but the runtime should never be changed as per the terms and conditions.. And all java implementations should always support the java api as soecufied by SUN at the minimum. Anyone who uses it should never change   the bytecode format which will nullify multiplatform advantage of java. Android violates by generating bytecode structure which will not run on any other jvm except dalvik.Android though is a java implementation partially implements the java standard in its own way.  Google knows from day one that this is a violation of terms. 

vammo aithe paisalu kattalna...

[billa85]

17 minutes ago, JavaBava said:

Nee yavva asalu case ento kuda telvada ... java is open source ..free to use but the runtime should never be changed as per the terms and conditions.. And all java implementations should always support the java api as soecufied by SUN at the minimum. Anyone who uses it should never change   the bytecode format which will nullify multiplatform advantage of java. Android violates by generating bytecode structure which will not run on any other jvm except dalvik.Android though is a java implementation partially implements the java standard in its own way.  Google knows from day one that this is a violation of terms. 

[cosmopolitan]

24 minutes ago, JavaBava said:

Nee yavva asalu case ento kuda telvada ... java is open source ..free to use but the runtime should never be changed as per the terms and conditions.. And all java implementations should always support the java api as soecufied by SUN at the minimum. Anyone who uses it should never change   the bytecode format which will nullify multiplatform advantage of java. Android violates by generating bytecode structure which will not run on any other jvm except dalvik.Android though is a java implementation partially implements the java standard in its own way.  Google knows from day one that this is a violation of terms. 

 

 

tensorflow vaade companies safe aa ayithe?.. can google say that  you cannot use it at enterprise level in future.

[Staysafebro]

32 minutes ago, JavaBava said:

Nee yavva asalu case ento kuda telvada ... java is open source ..free to use but the runtime should never be changed as per the terms and conditions.. And all java implementations should always support the java api as soecufied by SUN at the minimum. Anyone who uses it should never change   the bytecode format which will nullify multiplatform advantage of java. Android violates by generating bytecode structure which will not run on any other jvm except dalvik.Android though is a java implementation partially implements the java standard in its own way.  Google knows from day one that this is a violation of terms. 

Google knows what it did man. They were testing waters. If Oracle turned a blind eye for this one, it would truly mean that google would be able to create many alternative runtimes. 

Illu kattukora ani itukalu free ga isthe, google gaadu aa itukala dimensions, weight, and material anni copy kottesi vaadi own itukalu thayaru chesukunnadu. 

[JavaBava]

39 minutes ago, cosmopolitan said:

 

 

tensorflow vaade companies safe aa ayithe?.. can google say that  you cannot use it at enterprise level in future.

Every open source comes with license terms on how and when it is  free, what can be changed, how can it be distributed. Not all opensource is free in every way. Read the license completely to know when you are subjected to fees or law suits. Ila blanket questions ki answers undavu. 

[JavaBava]

 

Exact same case for when MS was sued by Sun:

Sun Microsystems had originally licensed Java to Microsoft but later initiated litigation against Microsoft for trademark violation. Sun's trademark license for usage of the Java brand insists that all implementations be "compatible".

Some observers have remarked that this incompatibility appears to have been a deliberate aim of Microsoft's, in an attempt to at least slow the advance of Sun's Java technology.^[7][8]

The failure of the MSJVM to pass Sun's compliance tests was a large factor in the initial lawsuit. On January 24, 2001, this and all other outstanding Sun-Microsoft lawsuits were settled as part of a wide-ranging agreement between Sun and Microsoft.^[9] As provided in the settlement, Microsoft could not incorporate into J++ features that Sun introduced into Java in versions beyond the one J++ had (at that date) been mirrored from; it would be frozen at the feature set of Java version 1.1.4. This effectively killed J++, and ended further updates. Microsoft was also forced to agree to cease distribution of the MSJVM; 

45 minutes ago, cosmopolitan said:

 

 

tensorflow vaade companies safe aa ayithe?.. can google say that  you cannot use it at enterprise level in future.

Every open source comes with license terms on how and when it is  free, what can be changed, how can it be distributed. Not all opensource is free in every way. Read the license completely to know when you are subjected to fees or law suits. Ila blanket questions ki answers undavu.