Jump to content

TRS MP’s too worst vaay


Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, Kool_SRG said:

Adaggodhu ani evvadu aneledu, bill pass ayina daanni unconstitutional anadaaniki ledu...Put your demands evaru kaadannaru, akkada TRS vaallu object chesindi bill unconstituional annanduke...

bill lo provision chesthe anni cheyyalsina baadyatha central govt pai undi...

Straight question to you 

Closing doors cutting of telecast is constitutional??

Posted
5 minutes ago, Satakarni_bali said:

Idi matram answer iyyadu, edo overnight bill draft chesi pass chesaru annattu

emana ante unconstitutional anta...doors close chesi anta....

doors close chesi pass chesindi 'bill' which was drafter well before, mari a bill draft chesinapudu nidra poinara TDP and Congress MP's ante next day varaku address lekunda poi malli vachi, state division sarigga jaragaledu antadu....

tannulu pade rojulu deggarapaddayi....andhrollu itle neelgithe inko round vuntadi...

Posted
1 minute ago, futureofandhra said:

Straight question to you 

Closing doors cutting of telecast is constitutional??

Yes. It is absolutely constitutional. 

by the order of the speaker of the house, it is absolutely constitutional. 

Posted
Just now, Android_Halwa said:

Yes. It is absolutely constitutional. 

by the order of the speaker of the house, it is absolutely constitutional. 

Lol did anyone in India seen it except  loksabha members??

Posted
2 minutes ago, futureofandhra said:

Straight question to you 

Closing doors cutting of telecast is constitutional??

may be you should understand first, what is constitutional and what is unconstitutional....

savakodtunnav....unconstitutional ga aithe INdia lo ipativaraku ae okka bill kuda pass avaledu, atla aithe supreme court la case esi bill ni nullify cheyochu...

niku unconstitutional aithe, supremem court ki velli case file chey.....nee lanti half baked gallu chala mandi vunnaru...vallandarini teesukellu...

Posted
Just now, Android_Halwa said:

Yes. It is absolutely constitutional. 

by the order of the speaker of the house, it is absolutely constitutional. 

rei nee G ra nee G..

Nizam olla daggara constiutional ga padukonna langa gallaki consitution anukonnatu ,idhi kooda constitution anukotiva ITEM Ga..

Posted
1 minute ago, futureofandhra said:

Lol did anyone in India seen it except  loksabha members??

why do anyone has to see it ? 

when the house first started functioning in 1947 and as republic later, did anyone has access to TV and is it a mandatory for anyone to watch the proceedings ? 

emi matladutunnav vaya nuv asalu....

Posted
Just now, jagadambachowdary said:

rei nee G ra nee G..

Nizam olla daggara constiutional ga padukonna langa gallaki consitution anukonnatu ,idhi kooda constitution anukotiva ITEM Ga..

nakindi saripokapothey poi cheeku....

Posted
1 minute ago, Android_Halwa said:

nakindi saripokapothey poi cheeku....

nuvvu chese aa rendu panulu bagane oppukonav ga ra ITEM ga..

Posted
16 minutes ago, futureofandhra said:

Straight question to you 

Closing doors cutting of telecast is constitutional??

Process lo tappulu jarigaayi kaadani anatla ayipoyina daani gurinchi(division) maatladi proyojanam ledu...

Em kaavalo adagatam, cheppinavi emi cheyyaeledo daani meeda focus cheyyali...

Posted
12 minutes ago, Kool_SRG said:

Process lo tappulu jarigaayi kaadani anatla ayipoyina daani gurinchi(division) maatladi proyojanam ledu...

Em kaavalo adagatam, cheppinavi emi cheyyaeledo daani meeda focus cheyyali...

Tomorrow another will be victim if autocracy is not questioned

Posted
37 minutes ago, Kool_SRG said:

@3$%  inka bill endi....

 

Bill lo amendments cheyyali tappulu unnayi ani venki taatha first year lo 2014-15 chepparu daani meeda working ani chepparu emi chesaaro teliyadu , taatha matuku VP ayipoyaadu... Nannemi adagakandi antaadu emaina ante...

he is game lo banana know now 

Posted
59 minutes ago, Android_Halwa said:

why do anyone has to see it ? 

when the house first started functioning in 1947 and as republic later, did anyone has access to TV and is it a mandatory for anyone to watch the proceedings ? 

emi matladutunnav vaya nuv asalu....

idi assalu logic less ga undi Halwa... doesnt make any sense at all at least to me..

Posted
1 hour ago, Android_Halwa said:

why do anyone has to see it ? 

when the house first started functioning in 1947 and as republic later, did anyone has access to TV and is it a mandatory for anyone to watch the proceedings ? 

emi matladutunnav vaya nuv asalu....

Current rules ela unnayo telisthe correct o wrong o telsudhhi.. 

 cops body cams off chesi edhaina kathal padi adigithe aa rojullo undena endhuku on cheyali always ani kochhening esthe correct ye Na? Untill there’s a rule to have cam always on

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...