saturn return in sagittarius

[Heroin]

14 minutes ago, Beardman said:

krschannel videos on a basic character or ascendants and nakshatras are accurate and it helped me to grow. He says some old souls are reborn to clear the mistakes of past lives which i think is wrong as astrology is only statistical information about lives, career. I may suspect if there are parallel universe exists where we download the information but not sure. what do you say

Interesting

[Amy99]

Scorpions unnara evaraina  

manchi time start annaru ... inka start avvaleda ..  

epudu avthadi ?! 

[Heroin]

Hehe im Capricorn

[Beardman]

25 minutes ago, Amrita said:

There could be parallel universes too. If you also follow Dharmesh Mehta channel or videos recently he said manam earth lo base chesukoni e charts create chestam using rising sun and seeing position of planets from earth  ala mars lo life unte astrological charts and software needs to updated and it would be more interesting and challenging for astrologers ani oka conference lo told. I think there is possibility of parallel universe and our vedic astrology can still be applied if that exists. Reference point change avutundi ante. 

I believe in past life karmas.  D30 (Trimsamsa Chart) indicates punishments and hardships due to past life karma. D40(Khvesamsa chart) indicates auspicious and inauspicious events related to mother and forefathers on her side.. D45 (Akshavedamsa chart) indicates auspicious and inauspicious events related to father and forefathers on his side. D60 (Shashtyamsa chart) The destiny events related to past karma can be interpreted.  We basically analyze all 20 charts at least at min to predict a horoscope if done thoroughly. Varga charts anni hold same importance IMO. Birth and navamsa nammite anni nammali. Just my opinion. 

 

mathematics was there before astrology spread. We  should go with math,numbers,physics theories to solve the answers but not to look at the astrological charts. Nothing beats scientific temper and rational thinking.

[Amrita]

4 minutes ago, Beardman said:

mathematics was there before astrology spread. We  should go with math,numbers,physics theories to solve the answers but not to look at the astrological charts. Nothing beats scientific temper and rational thinking.

I am at work and will watch that video after work but do u think there are no mathematic calculations in vedic astrology? Beeja sputa, punya saham, kshetra sputa, vivaha saham avanni mathematical calculations based on angles and formulas aey ga? Miracle degrees etc are also based on angles aey kada? Vedic astrology is based on math and numbers aey. 

 

[Beardman]

28 minutes ago, Amrita said:

I am at work and will watch that video after work but do u think there are no mathematic calculations in vedic astrology? Beeja sputa, punya saham, kshetra sputa, vivaha saham avanni mathematical calculations based on angles and formulas aey ga? Miracle degrees etc are also based on angles aey kada? Vedic astrology is based on math and numbers aey. 

 

Astrology is a pseudo-science which claims that the positions of the heavenly bodies have an effect on the lives of human beings and events on Earth.

A long time ago, astronomy and astrology were the same. People studied the motions of the planets and hoped to used them to predict not only the behavior of the heavens, but also wars, natural disasters, the rise and fall of kings, and other earthly matters. However, around the time of Johannes Kepler, Galileo Galilei and Isaac Newton, astronomers came to realize that astrology was basically bunk. From that time on, the primary job of an astronomer was to use physics to understand what was going on in the sky.

Some people stuck to astrology, though. Astrologers use computer programs that tell them the positions of the planets (using the work of real scientists, incidentally), and they do not look through telescopes or learn about stars and planets and galaxies and so forth like astronomers do--except perhaps for fun.

Astrology has many of the trappings of real science, like math and complicated diagrams and a specialized vocabulary, but astrologers do not follow the scientific method. Real scientists make careful measurements in well-controlled studies. Astrologers don't do experiments to prove their theories. Instead, they like to provide anecdotal evidence--stories people tell about how accurate they think astrology is. Anecdotal evidence is not acceptable in a real science because it's too easy to leave out all the negative experiences people have, and people not very good at recalling and accurately reporting experiences.

http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/about-us/145-people-in-astronomy/careers-in-astronomy/general-questions/899-what-s-the-difference-between-astronomy-and-astrology-beginner

[Amrita]

8 minutes ago, Beardman said:

Astrology is a pseudo-science which claims that the positions of the heavenly bodies have an effect on the lives of human beings and events on Earth.

A long time ago, astronomy and astrology were the same. People studied the motions of the planets and hoped to used them to predict not only the behavior of the heavens, but also wars, natural disasters, the rise and fall of kings, and other earthly matters. However, around the time of Johannes Kepler, Galileo Galilei and Isaac Newton, astronomers came to realize that astrology was basically bunk. From that time on, the primary job of an astronomer was to use physics to understand what was going on in the sky.

Some people stuck to astrology, though. Astrologers use computer programs that tell them the positions of the planets (using the work of real scientists, incidentally), and they do not look through telescopes or learn about stars and planets and galaxies and so forth like astronomers do--except perhaps for fun.

Astrology has many of the trappings of real science, like math and complicated diagrams and a specialized vocabulary, but astrologers do not follow the scientific method. Real scientists make careful measurements in well-controlled studies. Astrologers don't do experiments to prove their theories. Instead, they like to provide anecdotal evidence--stories people tell about how accurate they think astrology is. Anecdotal evidence is not acceptable in a real science because it's too easy to leave out all the negative experiences people have, and people not very good at recalling and accurately reporting experiences.

http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/about-us/145-people-in-astronomy/careers-in-astronomy/general-questions/899-what-s-the-difference-between-astronomy-and-astrology-beginner

Good and knowledgable astrologers  do follow scientific methods and do experiments. We cannot generalize based on an article. Dr. Arjun Pai pai padhati ani kanipettadu kuda he is the creator ...kapiel raj from whom you learned how to check charts is his student. I learned pai padhati too from arjun pai though i am not good at it as i missed many classes with moving for new projects etc. They have a pai team too. Enduku cheyaru experiments? We get inclined to what we believe and take what we want. Anyways agree to disagree.

[kevinUsa]

if astrology is a myth 

how come their calculations are so perfect 

[dakumangalsingh]

2 hours ago, dasara_bullodu said:

You should know your ascendent sign

Capricorn 

[Beardman]

12 minutes ago, kevinUsa said:

if astrology is a myth 

how come their calculations are so perfect 

They already study the charts of various people and implement on new person using that information. That is the reason astrologers speculate and give advices but they cant accurately tell isfsomething is going to happen. Barnum effect explains the reasons,

 

[Heroin]

2 minutes ago, dakumangalsingh said:

Capricorn 

Ok how is ur life going on 

[dakumangalsingh]

1 minute ago, Heroin said:

Ok how is ur life going on 

Naa ascendant Capricorn 

sign is scorpion 

life haa Chana gabbu gaa vundi 

aug nunchi change avtundii ani predictions. Chudam already 2013 okay vunde.

2014-2017 aithe worst years of my life professional life personal life everything was piece of  

[Heroin]

1 minute ago, dakumangalsingh said:

Naa ascendant Capricorn 

sign is scorpion 

life haa Chana gabbu gaa vundi 

aug nunchi change avtundii ani predictions. Chudam already 2013 okay vunde.

2014-2017 aithe worst years of my life professional life personal life everything was piece of  

Ok don't worry it will be good le

[Beardman]

9 minutes ago, dakumangalsingh said:

Naa ascendant Capricorn 

sign is scorpion 

life haa Chana gabbu gaa vundi 

aug nunchi change avtundii ani predictions. Chudam already 2013 okay vunde.

2014-2017 aithe worst years of my life professional life personal life everything was piece of  

Satan in scorpio !!.. Been there, done with that shyt.

If Rahul and ketan supports you, your life would be awesome 

[Beardman]

31 minutes ago, Amrita said:

Good and knowledgable astrologers  do follow scientific methods and do experiments. We cannot generalize based on an article. Dr. Arjun Pai pai padhati ani kanipettadu kuda he is the creator ...kapiel raj from whom you learned how to check charts is his student. I learned pai padhati too from arjun pai though i am not good at it as i missed many classes with moving for new projects etc. They have a pai team too. Enduku cheyaru experiments? We get inclined to what we believe and take what we want. Anyways agree to disagree.

I read pai paddhati...its a generalised concept based on nakshatras.. i am between agree(30%) disagree(70%). Hoping some day Astronomy and astrology unite and set the equation straight