anyone around?

[krldr871]

[quote author=MICKEY link=topic=89042.msg950462#msg950462 date=1281686922]
maku ee tade prapancham kada mama .. indulone matladukuntam, indulone evaraina unnaremo ani vethukutam :)
[/quote]
+_( +_( +_(
[quote author=Leader871 link=topic=89042.msg950459#msg950459 date=1281686888]
oka variety ques..naku ilanti thoughts endku vastayo telidu kani..vinu 
dream within a dream annanu kadha..ante dream anedhi 2 times vachindi kabatti nuvvu 2  #~` vesava..or nenu kuda anduke 2  sSc_hiding2 vesanantava..emantav..deeni meedha ne abhiprayam enti
[/quote]

[roxiczone]

[quote author=Leader871 link=topic=89042.msg950459#msg950459 date=1281686888]
oka variety ques..naku ilanti thoughts endku vastayo telidu kani..vinu 
dream within a dream annanu kadha..ante dream anedhi 2 times vachindi kabatti nuvvu 2  #~` vesava..or nenu kuda anduke 2  sSc_hiding2 vesanantava..emantav..deeni meedha ne abhiprayam enti
[/quote]
Sabaki namaskaram...Mundhu meeru adigina question gurunchi chepalante nee ideas keka sSc_hiding2,2stage annav kadha andukane 2 vesa...

[krldr871]

[quote author=roxiczone link=topic=89042.msg950465#msg950465 date=1281687061]
Sabaki namaskaram...Mundhu meeru adigina question gurunchi chepalante nee ideas keka sSc_hiding2,2stage annav kadha andukane 2 vesa...
[/quote]
ila ques adiginanduku conscious ga okate  sSc_hiding2 vesundachaa..so basic ga deenni batti neku em ardham ayyindi..deenne butterfly effect anochantava  ~"! ~"!

[chotu gadu]

koi haii??????????

[krldr871]

[quote author=chotu gadu link=topic=89042.msg950467#msg950467 date=1281687284]
koi haii??????????
[/quote]
come on join the discoo..last 3 4 posts chadivi ne opinion cheppu

[roxiczone]

[quote author=Leader871 link=topic=89042.msg950466#msg950466 date=1281687263]
ila ques adiginanduku conscious ga okate  sSc_hiding2 vesundachaa..so basic ga deenni batti neku em ardham ayyindi..deenne butterfly effect anochantava  ~"! ~"!
[/quote] j&* j&* em ardham kaledhu

[roxiczone]

[quote author=chotu gadu link=topic=89042.msg950467#msg950467 date=1281687284]
koi haii??????????
[/quote]
Dr@w@ 77 users online lo vunnaru kani okkalu kuda postlu veyatledhu[img]http://www.bewarsetalk.net/discus/movieanimated7/bemmi.frock.gif[/img]

[chotu gadu]

[quote author=Leader871 link=topic=89042.msg950468#msg950468 date=1281687315]
come on join the discoo..last 3 4 posts chadivi ne opinion cheppu
[/quote] sSc_hiding2 sSc_hiding2

[krldr871]

[quote author=roxiczone link=topic=89042.msg950469#msg950469 date=1281687405]
j&* j&* em ardham kaledhu
[/quote]
The term "butterfly effect" itself is related to the work of Edward Lorenz, and is based in chaos theory and sensitive dependence on initial conditions, already described in the literature in a particular case of the three-body problem by Henri Poincaré in 1890[1]. He even later proposed that such phenomena could be common, say in meteorology. In 1898[2] Jacques Hadamard noted general divergence of trajectories in spaces of negative curvature, and Pierre Duhem discussed the possible general significance of this in 1908[3]. The idea that one butterfly could eventually have a far-reaching ripple effect on subsequent historic events seems first to have appeared in a 1952 short story by Ray Bradbury about time travel (see Literature and print here) although Lorenz made the term popular. In 1961, Lorenz was using a numerical computer model to rerun a weather prediction, when, as a shortcut on a number in the sequence, he entered the decimal .506 instead of entering the full .506127 the computer would hold. The result was a completely different weather scenario.[4] Lorenz published his findings in a 1963 paper[5] for the New York Academy of Sciences noting[citation needed] that "One meteorologist remarked that if the theory were correct, one flap of a seagull's wings could change the course of weather forever." Later speeches and papers by Lorenz used the more poetic butterfly. According to Lorenz, upon failing to provide a title for a talk he was to present at the 139th meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in 1972, Philip Merilees concocted Does the flap of a butterfly’s wings in Brazil set off a tornado in Texas? as a title. Although a butterfly flapping its wings has remained constant in the expression of this concept, the location of the butterfly, the consequences, and the location of the consequences have varied widely.[6]
The phrase refers to the idea that a butterfly's wings might create tiny changes in the atmosphere that may ultimately alter the path of a tornado or delay, accelerate or even prevent the occurrence of a tornado in a certain location. The flapping wing represents a small change in the initial condition of the system, which causes a chain of events leading to large-scale alterations of events (compare: domino effect). Had the butterfly not flapped its wings, the trajectory of the system might have been vastly different. While the butterfly does not "cause" the tornado in the sense of providing the energy for the tornado, it does "cause" it in the sense that the flap of its wings is an essential part of the initial conditions resulting in a tornado, and without that flap that particular tornado would not have existed.

[krldr871]

[quote author=chotu gadu link=topic=89042.msg950472#msg950472 date=1281687508]
sSc_hiding2 sSc_hiding2
[/quote]
edokati anandi ramanatham garu

[chotu gadu]

[quote author=Leader871 link=topic=89042.msg950473#msg950473 date=1281687540]
The term "butterfly effect" itself is related to the work of Edward Lorenz, and is based in chaos theory and sensitive dependence on initial conditions, already described in the literature in a particular case of the three-body problem by Henri Poincaré in 1890[1]. He even later proposed that such phenomena could be common, say in meteorology. In 1898[2] Jacques Hadamard noted general divergence of trajectories in spaces of negative curvature, and Pierre Duhem discussed the possible general significance of this in 1908[3]. The idea that one butterfly could eventually have a far-reaching ripple effect on subsequent historic events seems first to have appeared in a 1952 short story by Ray Bradbury about time travel (see Literature and print here) although Lorenz made the term popular. In 1961, Lorenz was using a numerical computer model to rerun a weather prediction, when, as a shortcut on a number in the sequence, he entered the decimal .506 instead of entering the full .506127 the computer would hold. The result was a completely different weather scenario.[4] Lorenz published his findings in a 1963 paper[5] for the New York Academy of Sciences noting[citation needed] that "One meteorologist remarked that if the theory were correct, one flap of a seagull's wings could change the course of weather forever." Later speeches and papers by Lorenz used the more poetic butterfly. According to Lorenz, upon failing to provide a title for a talk he was to present at the 139th meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in 1972, Philip Merilees concocted Does the flap of a butterfly’s wings in Brazil set off a tornado in Texas? as a title. Although a butterfly flapping its wings has remained constant in the expression of this concept, the location of the butterfly, the consequences, and the location of the consequences have varied widely.[6]
The phrase refers to the idea that a butterfly's wings might create tiny changes in the atmosphere that may ultimately alter the path of a tornado or delay, accelerate or even prevent the occurrence of a tornado in a certain location. The flapping wing represents a small change in the initial condition of the system, which causes a chain of events leading to large-scale alterations of events (compare: domino effect). Had the butterfly not flapped its wings, the trajectory of the system might have been vastly different. While the butterfly does not "cause" the tornado in the sense of providing the energy for the tornado, it does "cause" it in the sense that the flap of its wings is an essential part of the initial conditions resulting in a tornado, and without that flap that particular tornado would not have existed.
[/quote]

i don't believe...

[graham]

[quote author=chotu gadu link=topic=89042.msg950467#msg950467 date=1281687284]
koi haii??????????
[/quote]

main hoon

[chotu gadu]

[quote author=MICKEY link=topic=89042.msg950479#msg950479 date=1281687675]
main hoon
[/quote]
inka eedane padi thiruguthunnava...

[roxiczone]

[quote author=Leader871 link=topic=89042.msg950473#msg950473 date=1281687540]
The term "butterfly effect" itself is related to the work of Edward Lorenz, and is based in chaos theory and sensitive dependence on initial conditions, already described in the literature in a particular case of the three-body problem by Henri Poincaré in 1890[1]. He even later proposed that such phenomena could be common, say in meteorology. In 1898[2] Jacques Hadamard noted general divergence of trajectories in spaces of negative curvature, and Pierre Duhem discussed the possible general significance of this in 1908[3]. The idea that one butterfly could eventually have a far-reaching ripple effect on subsequent historic events seems first to have appeared in a 1952 short story by Ray Bradbury about time travel (see Literature and print here) although Lorenz made the term popular. In 1961, Lorenz was using a numerical computer model to rerun a weather prediction, when, as a shortcut on a number in the sequence, he entered the decimal .506 instead of entering the full .506127 the computer would hold. The result was a completely different weather scenario.[4] Lorenz published his findings in a 1963 paper[5] for the New York Academy of Sciences noting[citation needed] that "One meteorologist remarked that if the theory were correct, one flap of a seagull's wings could change the course of weather forever." Later speeches and papers by Lorenz used the more poetic butterfly. According to Lorenz, upon failing to provide a title for a talk he was to present at the 139th meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in 1972, Philip Merilees concocted Does the flap of a butterfly’s wings in Brazil set off a tornado in Texas? as a title. Although a butterfly flapping its wings has remained constant in the expression of this concept, the location of the butterfly, the consequences, and the location of the consequences have varied widely.[6]
The phrase refers to the idea that a butterfly's wings might create tiny changes in the atmosphere that may ultimately alter the path of a tornado or delay, accelerate or even prevent the occurrence of a tornado in a certain location. The flapping wing represents a small change in the initial condition of the system, which causes a chain of events leading to large-scale alterations of events (compare: domino effect). Had the butterfly not flapped its wings, the trajectory of the system might have been vastly different. While the butterfly does not "cause" the tornado in the sense of providing the energy for the tornado, it does "cause" it in the sense that the flap of its wings is an essential part of the initial conditions resulting in a tornado, and without that flap that particular tornado would not have existed.
[/quote] Thappu ayipoindhi naanu neenu chepu thesukoni kotukavali...eee sodhi antha endhuku chepu, 2 mukkalo chepachu ga....[img]http://pictures.picasion.com/pic16/f061925262b569e0e966ea246e6980f9.gif[/img]

[krldr871]

[quote author=chotu gadu link=topic=89042.msg950478#msg950478 date=1281687638]
i don't believe...
[/quote]
ante literal ga butterfly valla okatedo disaster ayitundi ani kakapoyina, chinna insignificant minute events kuda oka pedda event ni trigger cheyyachu ani ayithe nenu nammuthanu..ala ani daani valle jarigindi ani anukolemu kuda