HR1044 bill Senate lo pass avvadam impossible task

[acuman]

As said in previous post,GC raaka poyina you learn how system works here and can see closely.

[acuman]

On 7/12/2019 at 1:09 PM, Veeraveera said:

Annai neeku ardham avvatle. Dhantlo family immigration kuda 7 to 15% clause undhi. Makku and other countries ki benefit aa clause. Reps oppokoru. Only high skilled clause mathrame sesthe dems oppokoru. 

Disco leka mona house lo fass ayipoyindhi. Once it goes down for disco in Senate. Backlash will estart

This is not actual increase in family based.

 

this is like this

ippudu 100 GCs lo 7 Mexico, 7 India , 7 China famili quota lo aythe, through this bill they can take up to 15 without increasing total available 100.

[megadheera]

42 minutes ago, fasak_vachadu said:

e bill ekkadi varaku vachindi

Suryapet varaku vachindi. Driver chai taguthunnadu. Thaginaka decide chestadu . Back Hyd povala leka vijayawada povala ani

[acuman]

By the way HR1044 is not senate bill.

it’s a house bill. Senate bill is S.386. Which(S.386) Is a companion version of house bill HR1044 in senate bill.

 

so, how you think HR1044 house bill passes in senate?

[acuman]

Poddu poddune TV9 or Indian media chusi useless opinions tho vacchestharu.

[acuman]

On 7/12/2019 at 1:01 PM, Tellugodu said:

Any source on how and when they did it last time and why can’t they were able to stop it from passing the Congress few days ago ? 

See ITSERVE and lawyers talk

https://vimeo.com/261632886?fbclid=IwAR0P209w2D2oB9GHKLozq3dfpfxM3aj-Cmf_LUbtcW0wBUvFVZ1DJGpolm0

[user789]

On 7/11/2019 at 6:32 AM, samaja_vargamana said:

antunnaru attorneys..

Sankalu guddukokandi thammulu..

H1B slavery continues forever...

There is slight chance ani many are saying.

[reality]

1 hour ago, acuman said:

This is not actual increase in family based.

 

this is like this

ippudu 100 GCs lo 7 Mexico, 7 India , 7 China famili quota lo aythe, through this bill they can take up to 15 without increasing total available 100.

Yes, basic ga reservation system theesesinattu.

But, some illiterate vomericans think that, its a loss to them. No, may be IT field become more competitive and chetizens need to always run for their money by honing their skills all the time (which they don’t like).

But, its a boon to low-wage non-IT citizens, as it prevents outsiders from ROW to compete with their jobs, and gives them the much needed financial security.

[snoww]

1 hour ago, user789 said:

There is slight chance ani many are saying.

Rand Paul block theesesthe there is chance.

 

[user789]

31 minutes ago, snoww said:

Rand Paul block theesesthe there is chance.

 

yes. 

[LastManStanding]

4 hours ago, reality said:

Yes, basic ga reservation system theesesinattu.

But, some illiterate vomericans think that, its a loss to them. No, may be IT field become more competitive and chetizens need to always run for their money by honing their skills all the time (which they don’t like).

But, its a boon to low-wage non-IT citizens, as it prevents outsiders from ROW to compete with their jobs, and gives them the much needed financial security.

Family quota ki I.T ki link endi bhayya? Chala chala takkuva mandi untaru I.T lo who are through family quota? Why would any usc who works in I.T care ?

[reality]

44 minutes ago, LastManStanding said:

Family quota ki I.T ki link endi bhayya? Chala chala takkuva mandi untaru I.T lo who are through family quota? Why would any usc who works in I.T care ?

1044 lo 2 aspects unnayi kada.

1. Removal of per country cap of 7% on employment based GCs.

2. Increase family cap from 7 to 15%.

Ultimate intention of both is to clear the backlogs, by adjusting the caps (not by increasing the GCs by any means).

This means more GCs for IND and China and more people waiting in the line will get GCs, which obviously will have impact on IT field.

In the contrary, with the status-quo rule, more non-it people from ROW would take the lion’s share and give tough time to low-wage citizens of USA.

[LastManStanding]

2 hours ago, reality said:

1044 lo 2 aspects unnayi kada.

1. Removal of per country cap of 7% on employment based GCs.

2. Increase family cap from 7 to 15%.

Ultimate intention of both is to clear the backlogs, by adjusting the caps (not by increasing the GCs by any means).

This means more GCs for IND and China and more people waiting in the line will get GCs, which obviously will have impact on IT field.

In the contrary, with the status-quo rule, more non-it people from ROW would take the lion’s share and give tough time to low-wage citizens of USA.

Yup! You are right about Indians and Chinese considering the employment based GCs...paina family based gurinchi discuss chestunnaru kadha ani adiga. 

[fasak_vachadu]

house lo pass ayindi kada senate lo eppudu untadi voting

 

[nightkalalu]