Is chandrayaan crashed on moon ?

[MRI]

1 minute ago, Gaali_Gottam_Govinda said:

.

ee maataki aa maata.. covering kooda ichukoleka ullu gaanivi ayinavu kada bro..  

[Spartan]

Just now, MRI said:

horizontal speed ekkuva avutey maha avutey correct zone lo land avvadu kaani.. crash land enduku avuddi if it were not for vertical force? I am reading a post where NASA boasted that they selected the site for ISRO because of huge flat lands in this area. So, terrain ki kottukovadam kooda kashtam kada.. without its existence.. ofcourse those speeds are outrageous and can mean it traveled so far and hit a mountain.

nenu speed track chestunnapudu observe chesindi entante...

in attempt to get soft landing, during the brute braking phase ekkuva slow down chesaru...which effects vertical travel..but horizantal travel control cheyaledu at same rate...

2km range lo ki ragane..vertical drop was slower than the horizantal movement...

in general if that is the case..crash land avutadi any object...even if it is flat surface..

[reality]

3 minutes ago, Spartan said:

nenu speed track chestunnapudu observe chesindi entante...

in attempt to get soft landing, during the brute braking phase ekkuva slow down chesaru...which effects vertical travel..but horizantal travel control cheyaledu at same rate...

2km range lo ki ragane..vertical drop was slower than the horizantal movement...

in general if that is the case..crash land avutadi any object...even if it is flat surface..

[Spartan]

1 minute ago, reality said:

[reality]

2 minutes ago, Spartan said:

Already disturbed vaa., inka technicalities think cheyadam endhuku ani...

[Spartan]

Just now, reality said:

Already disturbed vaa., inka technicalities think cheyadam endhuku ani...

got it..same here.

[Gaali_Gottam_Govinda]

 

 

Interesting point here............ Lander may not have crashed after all........ there could be communication failure...... Hope for the best

[LazyRohit]

26 minutes ago, Spartan said:

nenu speed track chestunnapudu observe chesindi entante...

in attempt to get soft landing, during the brute braking phase ekkuva slow down chesaru...which effects vertical travel..but horizantal travel control cheyaledu at same rate...

2km range lo ki ragane..vertical drop was slower than the horizantal movement...

in general if that is the case..crash land avutadi any object...even if it is flat surface..

ayite pakka lechipoyinda uncle nakenduko 2 days lo malli back anipistundi

[SnehamKosam]

Antariksham cinemalo vadu second time poi repair chesi vastadu ga.. atla possible kaada 

[Gaali_Gottam_Govinda]

26 minutes ago, MRI said:

ee maataki aa maata.. covering kooda ichukoleka ullu gaanivi ayinavu kada bro..  

 

Bokkale Meeru ISRO NASA scientistlu........... meeru vachi nannu Interview cheyyatam.......... Antha pudingu gaalam ayyithe ila DB lo enduku dekhutham............ ee patiki NASA lobby lo discuss cheskunetollam what would have gone wrong about Chandrayaan2.

[reality]

[shaw183]

9 minutes ago, Gaali_Gottam_Govinda said:

 

 

Interesting point here............ Lander may not have crashed after all........ there could be communication failure...... Hope for the best

Really interesting point ..2km away from landing lost its communication .. @Spartan Plz elaborate on this brother.

[boeing747]

2 minutes ago, reality said:

quite a lot of failures unnai ga..anni Lunar crafts ena??

[reality]

2 minutes ago, boeing747 said:

quite a lot of failures unnai ga..anni Lunar crafts ena??

Yes

[Amrita]

8 minutes ago, SnehamKosam said:

Antariksham cinemalo vadu second time poi repair chesi vastadu ga.. atla possible kaada