CAA petitions in Supreme Court: All you need to know

[Sachin200]

New Delhi: A bench of three Supreme Court judges will today hear as many as 143-old petitions that have been filed regarding the contentious Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) which has irked nationwide protests including the national capital. A bench, headed by Chief Justice S A Bobde, which had issued notice to the Centre on December 18 on various pleas is likely to hear a batch of 143 petitions, including those filed by the Indian Union Muslim League (IUML) and Congress leader Jairam Ramesh.

According to reports, while most of the petitions filed in the apex court challenge the constitutional validity of the newly passed legislation, some of them seek a declaration that the act is constitutional. Some of the petitions filed later have also sought a stay on the operation of the legislation which came into force on January 10.

[Sachin200]

Any guess what will be the judgement ?

@Gnan_anna @Android__Halwa @Chinna84 @DummyVariable

 

[Android_Halwa]

Judgement uh ? Emuntadi...persecuted minorities in neighbkuring countries ani vundi Bill la Anthe kani ekada kuda religion word petaledu..

oka 1 year time pass chesi, problem enti ani adigutar anthe...

Supreme Court cannot involve in once itself in Law making...

[Android_Halwa]

Parliament has every right to make laws adhering to constitution and All that judiciary can do is to see if the law is being implanted properly ..Anthe kani Judiciary cannot have a day as to why such a le is made..

[lovemystate]

12 minutes ago, Android_Halwa said:

Parliament has every right to make laws adhering to constitution and All that judiciary can do is to see if the law is being implanted properly ..Anthe kani Judiciary cannot have a day as to why such a le is made..

if parliament makes a law requiring halwa to strip his parents in front of shah for security. Halwa will comply with great enthusiasm.

[Android_Halwa]

1 minute ago, lovemystate said:

if parliament makes a law requiring halwa to strip his parents in front of shah for security. Halwa will comply with great enthusiasm.

As long as you don’t cross the line my dear friend, you are welcome to criticize as much as you can. 
 

It does not take much for me to hurl an abuse at you, but I don’t believe in personal abusing. 
 

I hope you continue to criticize going further at every opportunity as long as you don’t cross the line...

[lovemystate]

3 minutes ago, Android_Halwa said:

As long as you don’t cross the line my dear friend, you are welcome to criticize as much as you can. 
 

It does not take much for me to hurl an abuse at you, but I don’t believe in personal abusing. 
 

I hope you continue to criticize going further at every opportunity as long as you don’t cross the line...

There is nothing personal there. So many parents, grand parents, children were kept in detention camps like animals by Mosha under the pretext they dont have papers. You dont feel for them at all - instead you throw the rule book "parliament has every right to make laws" to their face. I just did the same to you. Take this as an oppurtunity to offload the $hit you carry in your brain.

[Android_Halwa]

4 minutes ago, lovemystate said:

There is nothing personal there. So many parents, grand parents, children were kept in detention camps like animals by Mosha under the pretext they dont have papers. You dont feel for them at all - instead you throw the rule book "parliament has every right to make laws" to their face. I just did the same to you. Take this as an oppurtunity to offload the $hit you carry in your brain.

Did I not tell you not to take things personal rather stick to the topic ..and o welcome criticism. 
 

what part of it you didn’t understand ? 

[lovemystate]

Just now, Android_Halwa said:

Did I not tell you not to take things personal rather stick to the topic ..and o welcome criticism. 
 

what part of it you didn’t understand ? 

I understand you are caught pants down by your own arguments and dont really know how to dig yourself out.

[Android_Halwa]

22 minutes ago, lovemystate said:

I understand you are caught pants down by your own arguments and dont really know how to dig yourself out.

Stick to the issue..

[lovemystate]

2 minutes ago, Android_Halwa said:

Stick to the issue..

10gey ra maddi ga. you dont get to tell me how i post here. Respond if you have guts - hiding like a coward "personal comment. despite the fact it is not personal. 

And morover not only did i stick to the issue. By exposing your hypocrisy I sticked the issue in to your hole where it is really burning you.

[Android_Halwa]

17 minutes ago, lovemystate said:

10gey ra maddi ga. you dont get to tell me how i post here. Respond if you have guts - hiding like a coward "personal comment. despite the fact it is not personal. 

And morover not only did i stick to the issue. By exposing your hypocrisy I sticked the issue in to your hole where it is really burning you.

Respond to the topic, if you think you still have guts. 

[Chinna84]

1 hour ago, Sachin200 said:

Any guess what will be the judgement ?

@Gnan_anna @Android__Halwa @Chinna84 @DummyVariable

 

Doubt emundhi peaceful_brothers ki #BurnolShot guarantee .. 

[Android_Halwa]

1 hour ago, Sachin200 said:

Any guess what will be the judgement ?

@Gnan_anna @Android__Halwa @Chinna84 @DummyVariable

 

As expected, no stay order on CAA. 
 

Its a law made in parliament and I still don’t understand why judiciary will even give a stay order on a bill that has been passed in Parliament. 

[Sachin200]

6 hours ago, Android_Halwa said:

Parliament has every right to make laws adhering to constitution and All that judiciary can do is to see if the law is being implanted properly ..Anthe kani Judiciary cannot have a day as to why such a le is made..

Sometimes SC judgement kooda ultimate ga?