Andhra High Court Against Capital Shift?

[em_chicha]

6 minutes ago, Ryzen_renoir said:

High court 100% will rule CRDA repeal and 3 capitals is in violation of farmers agreement  , even Jagan knows this .

Andhukey modi venaka bend ayyi maree thiruguthunadu . 

Amaravathi will be decided in 2024 elections  , appatiki lot of judges, officers from TDP will retire . I don't think the big people backing amaravathi  can sustain after another loss .

Modi backing lekunda Jagan ilanti thingara chestalu  cheyadu  ani anukuntunna 

 

 

Anthe ga

[Ryzen_renoir]

11 minutes ago, em_chicha said:

Mari AP govt chesina repeal APCRDA bill waste antava

Unnecessary , amaravathi ney capital ga unchi , he can develop vizag  . 

Amaravathi ni size thaginchi , migatha areas lo basic infra development chesthey poye thakyva karchu tho .

But I can understand that the big money backers will not want anything less than the global city envisaged by TDP . 

courts lo indefinite ga delay aina Jagan will win , HC lo obvious ga against order vasthundhi , SC lo 10-20 years nadusthundhi . Appatiki TDP party power loki vadthundha ? Vachina money untadha ? 

[kidney]

Jalaga Capital shift anatledu... Capital Decentralization antunnadu... 

And as per Home Ministry... Administration is purely States Decision.. Crts or Jurisdiction can only involve on Compensation.. Assembly ikkada kattali.. Secretariat akkada vundali ani cheppe right HC ki ledhu.. 

[em_chicha]

2 minutes ago, kidney said:

Jalaga Capital shift anatledu... Capital Decentralization antunnadu... 

And as per Home Ministry... Administration is purely States Decision.. Crts or Jurisdiction can only involve on Compensation.. Assembly ikkada kattali.. Secretariat akkada vundali ani cheppe right HC ki ledhu.. 

correct aa renditi ki chala difference undi

[Ryzen_renoir]

2 minutes ago, kidney said:

Jalaga Capital shift anatledu... Capital Decentralization antunnadu... 

And as per Home Ministry... Administration is purely States Decision.. Crts or Jurisdiction can only involve on Compensation.. Assembly ikkada kattali.. Secretariat akkada vundali ani cheppe right HC ki ledhu.. 

Technically correct , the best kind of correct . 

Obviously the judges can interpret as whatever they want because Indian laws are old and vague .  There isn't any clear precedent or law for this matter .

Obvious ga center is backing state but high court lo three members panel lo two of them are named in Jagan's letter , so them ruling against the bills is a foregone conclusion

[em_chicha]

4 minutes ago, Ryzen_renoir said:

Unnecessary , amaravathi ney capital ga unchi , he can develop vizag  . 

Amaravathi ni size thaginchi , migatha areas lo basic infra development chesthey poye thakyva karchu tho .

But I can understand that the big money backers will not want anything less than the global city envisaged by TDP . 

courts lo indefinite ga delay aina Jagan will win , HC lo obvious ga against order vasthundhi , SC lo 10-20 years nadusthundhi . Appatiki TDP party power loki vadthundha ? Vachina money untadha ? 

TDP valu urukuntara Amaravati chinnadi ga unchite

already YCP Amaravati ki against ani pracharam chesaru pichi pulka lu

2024 elections lo it wont work

[Vaampire]

13 minutes ago, Ryzen_renoir said:

CRDA agreement has no safeguards for the landlord's in regards to the extent of expenditure or time limit  . So Yes , state government can keep on giving annual stipend until they develop plots and handover .

Stipends gaa ichesthadu. Pocket lo nunchi kaadhu gaa. State govt appu chesey kada.

After the agreement term(10 yrs or what ever it is), farmers will not get this monthly stipend. Appatiki area develop avuthey vallaki ichina plots ki value untadi. Lekhapothey Assam.

 

There is no proper definition for development. Agreement lo obvious gaa inni companies vasthayi. Ee infra Ani details undav.. layout vesi ive plots antey em chestharu. 

 

Migitha 3.5 yrs amaravathi money allocate cheyyakapothey aa tharuvatha everu power loki vachina amaravathi ni develop cheyyadam kastamey

[Vaampire]

9 minutes ago, Ryzen_renoir said:

Technically correct , the best kind of correct . 

Obviously the judges can interpret as whatever they want because Indian laws are old and vague .  There isn't any clear precedent or law for this matter .

Obvious ga center is backing state but high court lo three members panel lo two of them are named in Jagan's letter , so them ruling against the bills is a foregone conclusion

If u talk about ethics, those 2 judges should voluntarily move out of panel.  Not before me clause use cheyyali.  Until SC responds on jaggad letter, it's better if those named in the letter stay away from cases related to govt

[Ryzen_renoir]

6 minutes ago, em_chicha said:

TDP valu urukuntara Amaravati chinnadi ga unchite

already YCP Amaravati ki against ani pracharam chesaru pichi pulka lu

2024 elections lo it wont work

Adhey kadha , at some point there has to be some compromise  .

If a city is to thrive as a commercial center , it must have wide acceptance of people . Chandigarh would not be developed if either Punjabis or haryani's are chased out of it .   Hyderabad kooda intha stage ki vachindhi antey it had wide acceptance of Telugu people at large . 

Amaravathi lo ekkada undhi , you can't create something like that artificially . Compromise is the only way forward 

 

[Vaampire]

13 minutes ago, em_chicha said:

correct aa renditi ki chala difference undi

But HC never used the word decentralization. It always says capital shift

[Vaampire]

Just now, Ryzen_renoir said:

Adhey kadha , at some point there has to be some compromise  .

If a city is to thrive as a commercial center , it must have wide acceptance of people . Chandigarh would not be developed if either Punjabis or haryani's are chased out of it .   Hyderabad kooda intha stage ki vachindhi antey it had wide acceptance of Telugu people at large . 

Amaravathi lo ekkada undhi , you can't create something like that artificially . Compromise is the only way forward 

 

Unfortunately both the parties(govt & farmers) are not ready for it. State cm initiate cheyyali talks. Kaani cheyyadam ledhu

[Ryzen_renoir]

1 minute ago, Vaampire said:

But HC never used the word decentralization. It always says capital shift

The judge can Interpret it whatever way he wants , it's not like the entire roster is saying that 

[Ryzen_renoir]

Just now, Vaampire said:

Unfortunately both the parties(govt & farmers) are not ready for it. State cm initiate cheyyali talks. Kaani cheyyadam ledhu

Try chesaru kadha , they even had talks with outer villages . Vaallaki land return isthmu + Guntur - Hyderabad alternative road ani promise chesadu 

[em_chicha]

16 minutes ago, Vaampire said:

But HC never used the word decentralization. It always says capital shift

HC is also politicizing this issue

how come these idiots will protect law

[em_chicha]

18 minutes ago, Ryzen_renoir said:

Adhey kadha , at some point there has to be some compromise  .

If a city is to thrive as a commercial center , it must have wide acceptance of people . Chandigarh would not be developed if either Punjabis or haryani's are chased out of it .   Hyderabad kooda intha stage ki vachindhi antey it had wide acceptance of Telugu people at large . 

Amaravathi lo ekkada undhi , you can't create something like that artificially . Compromise is the only way forward 

 

what type of comprise you expect ?

TDP valu picha lafoot gallu, same with YCP too