reforms is an ongoing process. lol. Not a dictat fom above.

this bullshit BJP assholes, and their chamchas are sickening.

sure agri procurement needs reforms, but who should bear the brunt of those reforms is the question.

veellu evarini adigi pass chesaru bill? one fine day I read about this on twitter, and then called my cousin to make delusional plans for starting an agri commodity trading exchange. Its still a great idea, if one can bring in new tech to help farmers improve their yeilds and find the right price.

reforms should be in that direction. how to make the market more efficient. And should involve all stakeholders. especially the farmers.

7 minutes ago, narsy said:

annaaaaaaaaa..........

 trump bhaktulu andaru underground ellipoyara mee thatha ni okkadni chesesi.. 😢

Thatha gadu maa federal employees ki jeethalu pencha annappuday aadini disown chesam...

 

1 hour ago, rightwinger91 said:

dude seems like you also got conditioned with all the propaganda videos. go by facts bihar agri growth rate is much better than punjab since they reformed in 2006

 

lol. what agri growth? 

 

The state that makes use of MSP has the most efficient agricultural system, atleast in India. haha....

 

18 minutes ago, narsy said:

fruits and veggies aa.. em maatladthunnarandi. in what way bihar growth rate is higher than punjab?

punjab, and may be tamilnadu are the only states that have come close to global yields in rice. bihar is at the bottom probably among Indian states. I don't see the destruction of apmc to have benefited bihar. 

you can say it has led to destruction of cereal production in bihar. but then I wouldn't make such claims since I don't know what bihar was producing before 2006.

conclusion: taking away apmc isn't some catch all solution to improve productivity. Punjab that uses/abuses the apmc system has better yields than the 'competitive' bihar farmers. lol.

you are wrong. shekar gupta video post chesa watch it he compared the agri growth of bihar and punjab

agri growth ante rice only kaadu

 

4 minutes ago, narsy said:

lol. what agri growth? 

 

i am saying agri growth you are saying rice yield and there lies the difference. growing rice will give least returns in agri unless ofcourse govt buys it like in punjab

Just now, rightwinger91 said:

you are wrong. shekar gupta video post chesa watch it he compared the agri growth of bihar and punjab

agri growth ante rice only kaadu

 

sare inka deni lo bihar top lo undi.. cheppu. I'll dig that data. lets see if the magic pill of removing msp has created wonders in bihar, compared to punjab.

I have no interest in watching shekhar gupta's videos.

don't say veggies and fruits. they were never under essential commodities protection act.

 

1 minute ago, narsy said:

sare inka deni lo bihar top lo undi.. cheppu. I'll dig that data. lets see if the magic pill of removing msp has created wonders in bihar, compared to punjab.

I have no interest in watching shekhar gupta's videos.

don't say veggies and fruits. they were never under essential commodities protection act.

 

if you have no interest in knowing the facts and just want to talk shyt then you are free to when did i stop you

1 minute ago, rightwinger91 said:

i am saying agri growth you are saying rice yield and there lies the difference. growing rice will give least returns in agri unless ofcourse govt buys it like in punjab

agri growth is immaterial. you bring large parts of the state under cultivation, obviously your production will improve. It has nothing to do with the efficiency of the procurement system.

comparing yields doesn't mean apmc is better, ofcourse. Just that Punjab is way better... not even close to bihar. and bihar shouldn't be  even in the discussion for beating down punjab's achievements in agriculture. No indian state should be.

7 minutes ago, rightwinger91 said:

you are wrong. shekar gupta video post chesa watch it he compared the agri growth of bihar and punjab

agri growth ante rice only kaadu

 

Agreed

Just now, rightwinger91 said:

if you have no interest in knowing the facts and just want to talk shyt then you are free to when did i stop you

all you have to do is just tell me which 'essential commodity' production is more efficient in bihar, to prove your point. ANd I'll simply check if you are right, and acknowledge your point if you are.

agri growth is useless metric.

 

10 minutes ago, narsy said:

The state that makes use of MSP has the most efficient agricultural system, atleast in India. haha....

 

haha govt buying the over produced rice wheat which nobody eats and just sit in FCI godowns as waste storage

wasteful production and wastful storage is called most efficient agri system   

4 minutes ago, rightwinger91 said:

if you have no interest in knowing the facts and just want to talk shyt then you are free to when did i stop you

see this guy's thread has govt data, and bihar comes out in top on none of them

 

1 minute ago, rightwinger91 said:

haha govt buying the over produced rice wheat which nobody eats and just sit in FCI godowns as waste storage

wasteful production and wastful storage is called most efficient agri system   

haha.. that's what I'm saying. The guys who use MSP seem more efficient in producing their stuff.

looks like the 'market' in India is inefficient. No wonder productive farmers don't want to deal with the market without sufficient protections.

are you gonna listen to the smartest most productive farmers or mediocre ones about how to go forward? lol.

2 minutes ago, narsy said:

haha.. that's what I'm saying. The guys who use MSP seem more efficient in producing their stuff.

looks like the 'market' in India is inefficient. No wonder productive farmers don't want to deal with the market without sufficient protections.

are you gonna listen to the smartest most productive farmers or mediocre ones about how to go forward? lol.

Are O dumbfcuk narsy ga, niku indian farmers gurinchi enduku ra lambdike , u hate India kadha