tennisluvrredux Posted March 4, 2022 Report Posted March 4, 2022 3 minutes ago, HugoStrange said: I think u r looking at wrong, Its not about nothie balupu, its about Tagore ass licking british king. Yeah in recognition of that oka Nobel kooda visiresaaru ga Quote
anna_gari_maata Posted March 4, 2022 Report Posted March 4, 2022 1 hour ago, reality said: dantlo antha matter emundhi… straight gane undhi gaa… even without his explanation He is intending Pak and Bangladesh are part of India, even by National anthem. Now Congress can't even counteract with that one...this is gonna be the next national agenda like Article 370 Quote
reality Posted March 4, 2022 Report Posted March 4, 2022 1 hour ago, reality said: South revenue motham dengi thine kodukulu rasina paata idhi… south whole sale ga Dravid anta… tamil ledu teluhu ledu kannad ledu… the most diverse part of India li what a shame.  1 hour ago, reality said: Oka side paki gallani thiduthu… inko side punjab sindhu ni kalupukuni akhand bharath cheddam ani Bodi munda anadam… daniki manam goosepimples thechukovadam…  4 minutes ago, anna_gari_maata said: He is intending Pak and Bangladesh are part of India, even by National anthem. Now Congress can't even counteract with that one...this is gonna be the next national agenda like Article 370 We are just blindly following the pre-independence/ pre-partition ‘anthem’… that doesn’t make sense now… andhuke anedhi it needs change, for above reasons…, Quote
anna_gari_maata Posted March 4, 2022 Report Posted March 4, 2022 Just now, reality said:   We are just blindly following the pre-independence/ pre-partition ‘anthem’… that doesn’t make sense now… andhuke anedhi it needs change, for above reasons…, It won't change for simple reason If Congress wants it to change, they are denying Nehru legacy of National anthem If BJP wants it to change then they are denying Akhand Bharat Others don't care Quote
reality Posted March 4, 2022 Report Posted March 4, 2022 15 minutes ago, anna_gari_maata said: He is intending Pak and Bangladesh are part of India, even by National anthem. Now Congress can't even counteract with that one...this is gonna be the next national agenda like Article 370 What’s new in that…. Who doesn’t know that, Indian subcontinent was a group of small kingdoms around ~ 560. The Pakis wanted a separate country… and Sardar patel combined all those remaining kingdoms into a country called India. Now how does it make sense to called it a ‘national agenda’ to just add them back… lol. Quote
reality Posted March 4, 2022 Report Posted March 4, 2022 2 minutes ago, anna_gari_maata said: Akhand Bharat Deenni najanga believe chesthunnava… aadi bokkem kadhu… goosebumps propaganda anthe… Quote
Popular Post Raven_Rayes Posted March 4, 2022 Popular Post Report Posted March 4, 2022 23 minutes ago, reality said:   We are just blindly following the pre-independence/ pre-partition ‘anthem’… that doesn’t make sense now… andhuke anedhi it needs change, for above reasons…, Tagore wrote this poem not for the British, but in praise of the Indian civilization that was the driving force for people in that region. It's wrongly attributed as being in praise of the British emperor. look up the whole song - total 5 stanzas. Only first stanza was adopted as the anthem. It has nothing to do with the British. and also without the idea of continuing Indian civilization, there's no India at all. 1 2 Quote
Raven_Rayes Posted March 4, 2022 Report Posted March 4, 2022 24 minutes ago, anna_gari_maata said: It won't change for simple reason If Congress wants it to change, they are denying Nehru legacy of National anthem If BJP wants it to change then they are denying Akhand Bharat Others don't care didn't the rw scum you follow on twitter tell you what the anthem actually stands for? may be they hate Tagore, since he was vocally critical of hindu mahasabha . Quote
Gcp Posted March 4, 2022 Report Posted March 4, 2022 2 hours ago, reality said: South revenue motham dengi thine kodukulu rasina paata idhi… south whole sale ga Dravid anta… tamil ledu teluhu ledu kannad ledu… the most diverse part of India li what a shame. Buddy. This was written in 1911 when we were under British rule. Whole India was united to fight them. Divide and conquer was the British principle. Current political class uses the same. There could be some issues but please don't fall prey for the politicians Quote
ranku_mogudu Posted March 4, 2022 Report Posted March 4, 2022 1 hour ago, tennisluvrredux said: Edisinattundi ee logic, all 4 dravida sub cultures have existed since centuries including Tamil, Telugu, Kannada and Malayalam. Mari why just clubbing them all into 1 word, ante South ollu antha okate culture le ane balupu kabatti even acharya Tagore ki kooda dravida antey south of the hills ani.. ippudu banga antey kooda full bengal ani (andulo begal, assam,uttharanchal ivanni kooda unnayi).. this is the problem with we, we try to make issue of everything. those were the existing provinces in 1911. Same question Vidhya Province was also large one in which then capital Delhi also came. Census of India 1911 ani book untundhi saduvu kaka   1 Quote
ranku_mogudu Posted March 4, 2022 Report Posted March 4, 2022 2 hours ago, HugoStrange said: I think u r looking at wrong, Its not about nothie balupu, its about Tagore ass licking british king. He was not licking anything, he wrote for anyone who will be ruling.. he gave clarity that united India is by these provinces unity. He gave a clarity in 1937  Fact that this song was picked as National song First by Netaji Tagore was a True Patriot in every sense..please dont taint this saint with meager knowledge and wrong politcal propaganda  A letter from 1939: "I should only insult myself if I cared to answer those who consider me capable of such unbounded stupidity."  Another letter from Tagore to Pulin Behari Sen: "A certain high official in His Majesty's service, who was also my friend, had requested that I write a song of felicitation towards the Emperor. The request simply amazed me. It caused a great stir in my heart. In response to that great mental turmoil, I pronounced the victory in Jana Gana Mana of that Bhagya Vidhata (ed. God of Destiny) of India who has from age after age held steadfast the reins of India's chariot through rise and fall, through the straight path and the curved. That Lord of Destiny, that Reader of the Collective Mind of India, that Perennial Guide, could never be George V, George VI, or any other George. Even my official friend understood this about the song. After all, even if his admiration for the crown was excessive, he was not lacking in simple common sense."  Tagore said his official friend didn’t lack common sense, which suggests that others who believe in this controversy lacks common sense.   Quote
ranku_mogudu Posted March 4, 2022 Report Posted March 4, 2022 1 hour ago, reality said:   We are just blindly following the pre-independence/ pre-partition ‘anthem’… that doesn’t make sense now… andhuke anedhi it needs change, for above reasons…, The Provinces then were the true Spirit, This implies Indian Civilization, not India as a country Independent or under British rule.  Simple Logic tho Alochisthey.. He Spoke more About Civilizations that Flourished Since times and made what it is as Bharat  Sind(Sind River or Indus River) is a civilization, dravidian,( Land of Godavari,Kaveri,Krishna) and Sea coast all around Kalinga( then Utkala..utkala river later called Mahanadi) and sea coast, Bangla, Vindhya Civilization flourished on the Ganga and Jamuna rivers.  Punjab(Land of 5 Rivers) Gujarat,Marata( civilizations flourishing with sea coast)  he calls Jaladha thiranga (covered three sides by Water)  antha beautiful poem and unity ni ..meeru ilaaga vimarsinchadam entha varaku bhavyamo mee vignatha ki vodilesthuna  The Poet beautifully expressed that this is a land of civilizations that sprung and grew over abundant resources.  Since he was asked by a british officer and was sung in Congress meet on the occasion of coronation of George V as Emperor of India doesnt mean it was written to Praise him  Quote
perugu_vada Posted March 4, 2022 Report Posted March 4, 2022 Babar Azam beautiful 100 ni comment chese haters laga unnay ga comments antademo @Sucker uncle kani e thread chusthe .. ani antunna @r2d2 uncle 2 Quote
HugoStrange Posted March 4, 2022 Report Posted March 4, 2022 25 minutes ago, ranku_mogudu said: He was not licking anything, he wrote for anyone who will be ruling.. he gave clarity that united India is by these provinces unity. He gave a clarity in 1937  Fact that this song was picked as National song First by Netaji Tagore was a True Patriot in every sense..please dont taint this saint with meager knowledge and wrong politcal propaganda  A letter from 1939: "I should only insult myself if I cared to answer those who consider me capable of such unbounded stupidity."  Another letter from Tagore to Pulin Behari Sen: "A certain high official in His Majesty's service, who was also my friend, had requested that I write a song of felicitation towards the Emperor. The request simply amazed me. It caused a great stir in my heart. In response to that great mental turmoil, I pronounced the victory in Jana Gana Mana of that Bhagya Vidhata (ed. God of Destiny) of India who has from age after age held steadfast the reins of India's chariot through rise and fall, through the straight path and the curved. That Lord of Destiny, that Reader of the Collective Mind of India, that Perennial Guide, could never be George V, George VI, or any other George. Even my official friend understood this about the song. After all, even if his admiration for the crown was excessive, he was not lacking in simple common sense."  Tagore said his official friend didn’t lack common sense, which suggests that others who believe in this controversy lacks common sense.   yeru dataka teppa thageleyyadam ante telusa bro. He wrote it for the visit of George. He sang for him. Akanda bharth ante only provinces under british rule mention chesadu enduku bro. Not sure how Netaji selected it as national anthem as he died in 1945, national anthem was adopted in 1950. Sare jaha se acha was rejected as it has hindostan in it. Secular country ki kudaradu ani thesesaru. ee explanations anni wrong ee anukundam, then who is bagya vidhatha? Dont say its god. God ni bagya vidhatha ani peddaga anaru and what is god doing in Indian national anthem as we have multiple religions. Secular country as per constitution. Do u mean who ever is the president or prime minister? both are elected directly or indirectly by people and they work for the people. Quote
Spartan Posted March 5, 2022 Author Report Posted March 5, 2022 1 hour ago, Raven_Rayes said: Tagore wrote this poem not for the British, but in praise of the Indian civilization that was the driving force for people in that region. It's wrongly attributed as being in praise of the British emperor. look up the whole song - total 5 stanzas. Only first stanza was adopted as the anthem. It has nothing to do with the British. and also without the idea of continuing Indian civilization, there's no India at all.  @Raven_Rayes +1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.