Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 hours ago, dasari4kntr said:

FoWvWmhaYAAHvzd.jpg

 

Why not 18

3 + 4 square = 19

5 + 6 square = 41

2 + 4 square = 18

  • Upvote 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Funkops said:

Why not 18

3 + 4 square = 19

5 + 6 square = 41

2 + 4 square = 18

yes..that is also correct…as per the given sample…

Posted
9 minutes ago, Funkops said:

Why not 18

3 + 4 square = 19

5 + 6 square = 41

2 + 4 square = 18

 

4 minutes ago, dasari4kntr said:

yes..that is also correct…as per the given sample…

No , please use multiplication operator not plus 

Posted
Just now, ramudu said:

 

No , please use multiplication operator not plus 

ohh yes…lol its X not +…

Posted
23 minutes ago, ramudu said:

 

No , please use multiplication operator not plus 

Lol. All the previous answers used + as well

Posted
35 minutes ago, Funkops said:

Why not 18

3 + 4 square = 19

5 + 6 square = 41

2 + 4 square = 18

naku ide answer vacchindi

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...