Fake surveys of BJP exposed !

[bhaigan]

29 minutes ago, CaptainMaverick said:

India was not a Secular country....Congress had unconstitutionally imposed emergency which is undemocratic & autocratic....She had put opposition leaders in jail & then illegally inserted secular, socialist into constitution by way of bulldozing her autocracy in the parliament!!! India doesn't need Secularism....Indians are secular by nature....all religions native to India are secular in practice...India's history tells this...!!!

It is there in the constitution 

You can cry on congress, i dont care

But when you put some pathological lies notlo nunchi boothulu ae vasthayi

There is a reason for emergency , it is constitutional there is a reason for that, it is good or bad I wont judge, it could be frustrated thats it

Indira was very democratical, took bold decisions and got executed not unlike Modi who is an autocrat

BJP/RSS want to rewrite the history of India with it's own narrative thats not gone happen for sure 

 

 

[Spartan]

Just now, bhaigan said:

It is there in the constitution 

You can cry on congress, i dont care

But when you put some pathological lies notlo nunchi boothulu ae vasthayi

There is a reason for emergency , it is constitutional there is a reason for that, it could be little bit frustrated thats it

Indira was very democratical, took bold decisions and got executed not unlike Modi is autocrat

BJP/RSS want to rewrite the history with it's own narrative thats not gone happen for sure

[CaptainMaverick]

5 minutes ago, bhaigan said:

First of all are you expert in EVM's or you have any degrees in Electronics Manufacturing then only you comment otherwise all your statements are FAKE and You are Feku that I know

Funded by Congress antav proofs unnaya ???

Supreme Court lo case undi EVM's meeda, you should acknowledge that first.

TN is completely is different , BJP/RSS matha rajakeyalu south lo panicheyavu. So it will be Dravidian parties thats gone rule TN atleast for some more years.

TG lo congress ni odiyadaniki BJP/BRS enno kutarlu chesinayi, still Congress won

Delhi also same enno kutralu BJP/RSS chesindi, mee black magic panicheyaledu kabatte you sent Kejriwal to Jail to satisfy your nikkar narayan's EGO

Same thing with Kerala, BJP/RSS matha rajakeyalu south lo panicheyavu.

Hemanth Sorean NDA lo join avvanu ante kada tisukoni velli jail vesaru, mee jaffa laga modi ki ayithe udigam cheyaledu kada

Again and Again you are just a fake propagandist , when experts are putting strong comments in supreme court you just listen to it and make your views otherwise just shut up

 

 

 

 

 

allegations chestunnadi meeru...nuvvu chupettu proof...!!! 

Nuvvu allege chesthe adi nijam.....ade inkokadu chesthe proofs kaavala proofs!!!

Again and Again you are just a fake propagandist , when Supreme Court is putting strong comments against so-called Foreign NGO funded "experts" you just listen to it and make your views otherwise just shut up!

[bhaigan]

4 minutes ago, Spartan said:

‘Don’t Have To Be Suspicious About Everything’: SC On Pleas Seeking Cross-Verification Of EVM Votes

https://www.news18.com/india/supreme-court-pleas-evm-vvpat-voter-slip-cross-verification-verdict-reserved-eci-hearing-8857277.html

 

Here are the top quotes from the hearing

• The Election Commission of India told the court that no EVM tampering was possible.
• The Centre said such petitions came right ahead of elections so that an impression can be created that there’s something wrong with the system.
• Solicitor General Tushar Mehta said it’s to harm democracy. He added that the petitioners were making the choice of voters a joke.
• An ECI official told the court that the news report regarding Kasargod was utterly false as the algorithm was faulty in 2019. “Now we have updated it and it was working fine,” he added. To this, the court asked, “In 2019, what were the faults in the application? Wrong information was being fed?”
• The official replied, saying it was not getting updated in a synchronous manner. Justice Khanna asked, “What is the gap between the vote recorded in 17A and the vote cast in the machine?”
• The official answered, “There is no gap between 17C and votes recorded in the machine.” To this, Justice Khanna said, “I agree there will be no mismatch between 17A and 17C.”
• “We have been preparing for these elections for the past three years. We have taken a lot of painstaking efforts. We are quite pained by what has been said before this court,” the ECI told the court.
• The ECI said, “It has been stated that there has been only one discrepancy so far.”
• The court said, “The voter turnout these days is around 66%. This shows the faith of the people.”

The judge who made this decision has historical connection with janata party

Kasargod incident happened yesterday only, they were not talking about 2019

[bhaigan]

9 minutes ago, CaptainMaverick said:

allegations chestunnadi meeru...nuvvu chupettu proof...!!! 

Nuvvu allege chesthe adi nijam.....ade inkokadu chesthe proofs kaavala proofs!!!

Again and Again you are just a fake propagandist , when Supreme Court is putting strong comments against so-called Foreign NGO funded "experts" you just listen to it and make your views otherwise just shut up!

There is on going case in supreme court, just acknowledge it

The judge who gave the judgement has history with janata party

Foreign funded NGO's , Prashanth Bushan Foreign funded NGO na ??? Do you have proofs ???

[Spartan]

2 minutes ago, bhaigan said:

The judge who made this decision has historical connection with janata party

Kasargod incident happened yesterday only, they were not talking about 2019

endanna nuvvu...itla aite kashtam.

[CaptainMaverick]

2 minutes ago, bhaigan said:

 

Indira was very democratical, took bold decisions and got executed not unlike Modi is autocrat

 

 

 

The order bestowed upon the prime minister the authority to rule by decree, allowing elections to be cancelled and civil liberties to be suspended. For much of the Emergency, most of Gandhi's political opponents were imprisoned and the press were censored. Several other human rights violations were reported from the time. The Emergency is one of the most controversial periods of Indian history since its independence. The final decision to impose an emergency was proposed by Indira Gandhi, agreed upon by the President of India, and ratified by the Cabinet and the Parliament from July to August 1975. It was based on the rationale that there were imminent internal and external threats to the Indian state.^[

 

Between 1967 and 1971, Prime Minister Indira Gandhi came to obtain near-absolute control over the government and the Indian National Congress party, as well as a huge majority in Parliament. The first was achieved by concentrating the central government's power within the Prime Minister's Secretariat, rather than the Cabinet, whose elected members she saw as a threat and distrusted. For this, she relied on her principal secretary, P. N. Haksar, a central figure in Indira's inner circle of advisors. Further, Haksar promoted the idea of a "committed bureaucracy" that required hitherto-impartial government officials to be "committed" to the ideology of the Congress.

Within the Congress, Indira outmaneuvered her rivals, forcing the party to split in 1969—into the Congress (O) (comprising the old-guard known as the "Syndicate") and her Congress (R). A majority of the All-India Congress Committee and Congress MPs sided with the prime minister. Indira's party was of a different breed from the Congress of old, which had been a robust institution with traditions of internal democracy. In the Congress (R), on the other hand, members quickly realised that their progress within the ranks depended solely on their loyalty to Indira Gandhi and her family, and ostentatious displays of sycophancy became routine. In the coming years, Indira's influence was such that she could install hand-picked loyalists as chief ministers of states, rather than their being elected by the Congress legislative party.

 

Invoking articles 352 and 356 of the Indian Constitution, Indira Gandhi granted herself extraordinary powers and launched a massive crackdown on civil rights and political opposition. The Government used police forces across the country to place thousands of protestors and strike leaders under preventive detention. Vijayaraje Scindia, Jayaprakash Narayan, Mulayam Singh Yadav, Raj Narain, Morarji Desai, Charan Singh, Jivatram Kripalani, George Fernandes, Atal Bihari Vajpayee, Lal Krishna Advani, Arun Jaitley, Jai Kishan Gupta ^[23] Satyendra Narayan Sinha, Gayatri Devi, the dowager queen of Jaipur,^[24] and other protest leaders were immediately arrested. Organisations like the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and Jamaat-e-Islami, along with some political parties, were banned. CPI(M) leaders V.S. Achuthanandan and Jyotirmoy Basu were arrested along with many others involved with their party. Congress leaders who dissented against the Emergency declaration and amendment to the constitution, such as Mohan Dharia and Chandra Shekhar, resigned their government and party positions and were thereafter arrested and placed under detention.^[25][26] Members of regional opposition parties such as DMK also found themselves arrested.

Most of these arrests happened under laws such as MISA, DISIR, and COFEPOSA. During the emergency 34,988 people were arrested under MISA, and 75,818 people were arrested under DISIR. This included both political prisoners and ordinary criminals.^[27] Most states classified those arrested under MISA into multiple categories. For instance in Andhra Pradesh they were classified into three categories- Class A, Class B, and Class C. Class A prisoners included prominent political leaders, members of parliament, and members of the legislative assembly. Class B prisoners included less prominent political prisoners. Class C included those detained for "economic offences" and other offences. Class A and B prisoners were treated better and received better amenities in prison than other categories of prisoners. Those arrested under COFEPOSA and DISR, depending on the state, found themselves detained with ordinary criminals, as Class C prisoners, or their own separate category.^[28]

Cases like the Baroda dynamite case and the Rajan case became exceptional examples of atrocities committed against civilians in independent India.

Laws, human rights and elections[edit]

Elections for the Parliament and state governments were postponed. Gandhi and her parliamentary majorities could rewrite the nation's laws since her Congress party had the required mandate to do so – a two-thirds majority in the Parliament. And when she felt the existing laws were 'too slow', she got the President to issue 'Ordinances' – a law-making power in times of urgency, invoked sparingly – completely bypassing the Parliament, allowing her to rule by decree. Also, she had little trouble amending the Constitution that exonerated her from any culpability in her election-fraud case, imposing President's Rule in Gujarat and Tamil Nadu, where anti-Indira parties ruled (state legislatures were thereby dissolved and suspended indefinitely), and jailing thousands of opponents. The 42nd Amendment, which brought about extensive changes to the letter and spirit of the Constitution, is one of the lasting legacies of the Emergency. In the conclusion of his Making of India's Constitution, Justice Khanna writes:

If the Indian constitution is our heritage bequeathed to us by our founding fathers, no less are we, the people of India, the trustees, and custodians of the values which pulsate within its provisions! A constitution is not a parchment of paper, it is a way of life and has to be lived up to. Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty and in the final analysis, its only keepers are the people. The imbecility of men, history teaches us, always invites the impudence of power.^[29]

A fallout of the Emergency era was the Supreme Court laid down that, although the Constitution is amenable to amendments (as abused by Indira Gandhi), changes that tinker with its basic structure^[30] cannot be made by the Parliament. (see Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala)^[31]

In the Rajan case, P. Rajan of the Regional Engineering College, Calicut, was arrested by the police in Kerala on 1 March 1976,^[32] tortured in custody until he died and then his body was disposed of and was never recovered. The facts of this incident came out owing to a habeas corpus suit filed in the Kerala High Court.^[33][34]

Many cases where teens were arrested and imprisoned have come to light, one such example is of Dilip Sharma who aged 16 was arrested and imprisoned for over 11 months. He was released based on Patna High Court's judgment on 29 July 1976.^[35]

[CaptainMaverick]

4 minutes ago, bhaigan said:

There is on going case is there supreme court, just acknowledge it

The judge who gave the judgement has history with janata party

Foriegn funded NGO's , first of all you shut the mouth, after all you are just a bot

[bhaigan]

5 minutes ago, CaptainMaverick said:

The order bestowed upon the prime minister the authority to rule by decree, allowing elections to be cancelled and civil liberties to be suspended. For much of the Emergency, most of Gandhi's political opponents were imprisoned and the press were censored. Several other human rights violations were reported from the time. The Emergency is one of the most controversial periods of Indian history since its independence. The final decision to impose an emergency was proposed by Indira Gandhi, agreed upon by the President of India, and ratified by the Cabinet and the Parliament from July to August 1975. It was based on the rationale that there were imminent internal and external threats to the Indian state.^[

 

Between 1967 and 1971, Prime Minister Indira Gandhi came to obtain near-absolute control over the government and the Indian National Congress party, as well as a huge majority in Parliament. The first was achieved by concentrating the central government's power within the Prime Minister's Secretariat, rather than the Cabinet, whose elected members she saw as a threat and distrusted. For this, she relied on her principal secretary, P. N. Haksar, a central figure in Indira's inner circle of advisors. Further, Haksar promoted the idea of a "committed bureaucracy" that required hitherto-impartial government officials to be "committed" to the ideology of the Congress.

Within the Congress, Indira outmaneuvered her rivals, forcing the party to split in 1969—into the Congress (O) (comprising the old-guard known as the "Syndicate") and her Congress (R). A majority of the All-India Congress Committee and Congress MPs sided with the prime minister. Indira's party was of a different breed from the Congress of old, which had been a robust institution with traditions of internal democracy. In the Congress (R), on the other hand, members quickly realised that their progress within the ranks depended solely on their loyalty to Indira Gandhi and her family, and ostentatious displays of sycophancy became routine. In the coming years, Indira's influence was such that she could install hand-picked loyalists as chief ministers of states, rather than their being elected by the Congress legislative party.

 

Invoking articles 352 and 356 of the Indian Constitution, Indira Gandhi granted herself extraordinary powers and launched a massive crackdown on civil rights and political opposition. The Government used police forces across the country to place thousands of protestors and strike leaders under preventive detention. Vijayaraje Scindia, Jayaprakash Narayan, Mulayam Singh Yadav, Raj Narain, Morarji Desai, Charan Singh, Jivatram Kripalani, George Fernandes, Atal Bihari Vajpayee, Lal Krishna Advani, Arun Jaitley, Jai Kishan Gupta ^[23] Satyendra Narayan Sinha, Gayatri Devi, the dowager queen of Jaipur,^[24] and other protest leaders were immediately arrested. Organisations like the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and Jamaat-e-Islami, along with some political parties, were banned. CPI(M) leaders V.S. Achuthanandan and Jyotirmoy Basu were arrested along with many others involved with their party. Congress leaders who dissented against the Emergency declaration and amendment to the constitution, such as Mohan Dharia and Chandra Shekhar, resigned their government and party positions and were thereafter arrested and placed under detention.^[25][26] Members of regional opposition parties such as DMK also found themselves arrested.

Most of these arrests happened under laws such as MISA, DISIR, and COFEPOSA. During the emergency 34,988 people were arrested under MISA, and 75,818 people were arrested under DISIR. This included both political prisoners and ordinary criminals.^[27] Most states classified those arrested under MISA into multiple categories. For instance in Andhra Pradesh they were classified into three categories- Class A, Class B, and Class C. Class A prisoners included prominent political leaders, members of parliament, and members of the legislative assembly. Class B prisoners included less prominent political prisoners. Class C included those detained for "economic offences" and other offences. Class A and B prisoners were treated better and received better amenities in prison than other categories of prisoners. Those arrested under COFEPOSA and DISR, depending on the state, found themselves detained with ordinary criminals, as Class C prisoners, or their own separate category.^[28]

Cases like the Baroda dynamite case and the Rajan case became exceptional examples of atrocities committed against civilians in independent India.

Laws, human rights and elections[edit]

Elections for the Parliament and state governments were postponed. Gandhi and her parliamentary majorities could rewrite the nation's laws since her Congress party had the required mandate to do so – a two-thirds majority in the Parliament. And when she felt the existing laws were 'too slow', she got the President to issue 'Ordinances' – a law-making power in times of urgency, invoked sparingly – completely bypassing the Parliament, allowing her to rule by decree. Also, she had little trouble amending the Constitution that exonerated her from any culpability in her election-fraud case, imposing President's Rule in Gujarat and Tamil Nadu, where anti-Indira parties ruled (state legislatures were thereby dissolved and suspended indefinitely), and jailing thousands of opponents. The 42nd Amendment, which brought about extensive changes to the letter and spirit of the Constitution, is one of the lasting legacies of the Emergency. In the conclusion of his Making of India's Constitution, Justice Khanna writes:

If the Indian constitution is our heritage bequeathed to us by our founding fathers, no less are we, the people of India, the trustees, and custodians of the values which pulsate within its provisions! A constitution is not a parchment of paper, it is a way of life and has to be lived up to. Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty and in the final analysis, its only keepers are the people. The imbecility of men, history teaches us, always invites the impudence of power.^[29]

A fallout of the Emergency era was the Supreme Court laid down that, although the Constitution is amenable to amendments (as abused by Indira Gandhi), changes that tinker with its basic structure^[30] cannot be made by the Parliament. (see Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala)^[31]

In the Rajan case, P. Rajan of the Regional Engineering College, Calicut, was arrested by the police in Kerala on 1 March 1976,^[32] tortured in custody until he died and then his body was disposed of and was never recovered. The facts of this incident came out owing to a habeas corpus suit filed in the Kerala High Court.^[33][34]

Many cases where teens were arrested and imprisoned have come to light, one such example is of Dilip Sharma who aged 16 was arrested and imprisoned for over 11 months. He was released based on Patna High Court's judgment on 29 July 1976.^[35]

Indira was Iron lady , she carved out Bangladesh from Pakistan, because of her bold decisions punjab is still there in India. You hate or like Indira she was very very bold Iron lady which is true.

[bhaigan]

12 minutes ago, Spartan said:

endanna nuvvu...itla aite kashtam.

Justice Sanjiv Khanna's father Hans Raj Khanna was also former SC Judge & had resigned to work with erstwhile Janata Party Govt, also losing Presidential post to Congress supported Giani Zail Singh.

[bhaigan]

1 hour ago, Spartan said:

‘Don’t Have To Be Suspicious About Everything’: SC On Pleas Seeking Cross-Verification Of EVM Votes

https://www.news18.com/india/supreme-court-pleas-evm-vvpat-voter-slip-cross-verification-verdict-reserved-eci-hearing-8857277.html

 

Here are the top quotes from the hearing

• The Election Commission of India told the court that no EVM tampering was possible.
• The Centre said such petitions came right ahead of elections so that an impression can be created that there’s something wrong with the system.
• Solicitor General Tushar Mehta said it’s to harm democracy. He added that the petitioners were making the choice of voters a joke.
• An ECI official told the court that the news report regarding Kasargod was utterly false as the algorithm was faulty in 2019. “Now we have updated it and it was working fine,” he added. To this, the court asked, “In 2019, what were the faults in the application? Wrong information was being fed?”
• The official replied, saying it was not getting updated in a synchronous manner. Justice Khanna asked, “What is the gap between the vote recorded in 17A and the vote cast in the machine?”
• The official answered, “There is no gap between 17C and votes recorded in the machine.” To this, Justice Khanna said, “I agree there will be no mismatch between 17A and 17C.”
• “We have been preparing for these elections for the past three years. We have taken a lot of painstaking efforts. We are quite pained by what has been said before this court,” the ECI told the court.
• The ECI said, “It has been stated that there has been only one discrepancy so far.”
• The court said, “The voter turnout these days is around 66%. This shows the faith of the people.”

Brief analysis on supreme court trail today

[bhaigan]

 

 Sanghi's and fake propagandist who cry on EVM's allegations

[Raisins_72]

1 hour ago, bhaigan said:

Sanghi badcow like you please stay away

But when you put some pathological lies notlo nunchi boothulu ae vasthayi

[Raisins_72]

1 hour ago, bhaigan said:

It is there in the constitution 

You can cry on congress, i dont care

But when you put some pathological lies notlo nunchi boothulu ae vasthayi

There is a reason for emergency , it is constitutional there is a reason for that, it is good or bad I wont judge, it could be frustrated thats it

Indira was very democratical, took bold decisions and got executed not unlike Modi who is an autocrat

BJP/RSS want to rewrite the history of India with it's own narrative thats not gone happen for sure 

 

 

But when you put some pathological lies notlo nunchi boothulu ae vasthayi

[bhaigan]

50 minutes ago, Raisins_72 said:

But when you put some pathological lies notlo nunchi boothulu ae vasthayi

Nenu proofs ae peduthunna 

Sanghi's like you please stay away